Verifying access...
Entry #188
AES Student Submission form
Submitted: 2025-12-06 00:27:04
Form Fields
Duplicate
Admin Only
ID: 39
Faculty and/or Staff Mentor(s)
- All student submissions for presentations at AES must have the approval of a WOU faculty or staff mentor. To learn more about this requirement please visit http://wou.edu/pure/academicexcellenceshowcase/students/. The identified and approving mentor(s) will be automatically notified upon completion of this form.
- If you do not have a mentor's approval, please discuss your presentation ideas and proposal abstract with a faculty or staff member and ask them for their approval and sponsorship before completing this form.
- You must have approval BEFORE submitting or your presentation may not be included in AES.
Mentor Email
ID: 30
Mentor Name
ID: 29
First: Ethan
Last: McMahan
Do you have more than one mentor who should be listed for this submission?
ID: 32
No
Has your faculty or staff mentor reviewed your proposal and approved it for submission?
ID: 3
Yes: Yes
Presenters
ID: 4
| WOU Email | First Name | Last Name | vNumber | Major | Year (Senior, Junior, etc.) | Home Town |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kpikl24@wou.edu | Kali | Pikl | V00403101 | Psychology | Senior | Sacramento, CA |
What type of session are you participating in?
ID: 6
Presentation
Do you have a session key provided by your faculty mentor(s)?
ID: 8
No
Select the session topic(s) that best match your presentation
ID: 12
- Check-in and coffee
Title of your presentation/poster/performance
ID: 7
Seeing Is No Longer Believing: Teaching Visual Literacy in the Age of AI
Are there any accompanists or composers that should be recognized in the program?
ID: 14
No
Did your project involve Human Subjects?
ID: 15
Yes
Abstract or image files
ID: 17
I will add an abstract now
Abstract
ID: 21
With the rate at which Artificial Intelligence models are advancing, media literacy and critical analysis of multiple formats of information are vital skills. The current study sampled 87 university students and sought to measure their ability to detect AI-altered/generated images. The study involved a treatment portion with AI literacy tips and training that allowed for participant engagement with the AI-artifacts in the image. They then completed a post-treatment survey to evaluate for change in scores. The research hypothesized that there would be a significant difference between the participant’s pre-treatment and post-treatment scores. A paired-samples t-test showed that post-treatment survey scores (M = 11.66, SD = 2.25) were significantly higher than pre-treatment scores (M = 9.05, SD = 2.61), t(86) = -10.19, p < .001, 95% CI [-3.12, -2.10]. The training produced a substantial improvement in scores, isolating for individual differences such as demographic variables, demonstrating a large effect size with Cohen’s d = 1.09. These results show a strong ability to teach audiences how to recognize images that have been generated or altered by AI, though the applicability to the generalized population of the specific tips provided in this study is questionable as image-generating AI models will likely phase out many of the included AI-artifacts.
Do you give us permission to publish your work online in partnership with Hamersly Library?
ID: 16
Yes
Would you be interested in submitting your work to PURE Insights?
ID: 24
Yes
Model release statement
ID: 18
Yes
Are you willing to allow WOU to make a video recording of your session?
ID: 23
Yes, but I want to know one or more weeks before AES
I am interested in participating in a session to learn about preparing:
ID: 25
Posters: Posters
Presentations: Presentations
Notes/Comments
ID: 26
Although I currently live in Sacramento, I would make myself available to present this either in person or via recording.
Name
Hidden
ID: 33
First: Kali
Last: Pikl
vNumber
Hidden
ID: 34
V00403101
Email
Hidden
ID: 35
kpikl24@wou.edu

