Mount Hood

Opinion: Western fails with its Percent for Art money

Paul F. Davis | Managing Editor

Art: it celebrates, reflects and critiques current times, something that is important now more than ever before, yet this idea is something that’s not reflected on Western’s campus. Western has a tradition of choosing pieces for building’s Percent for Art, a state law that requires all publicly funded construction plans with budgets over $100,000 to set aside 1 percent for art, requirements that are out of line with its students and the campus.

Future Percent for Art pieces should look to accomplish a few things. First, the art should not try to blend in with its surrounds but also not ignore them completely. For example, instead of choosing a bright purple and fuchsia color scheme as the piece in front of the RWEC did, it should have gone for a less saturated red and yellow palette to match and complement the red on the brick of the building.

Pieces should also attempt to symbolize the space for which it is contained within. The art within DeVolder, one of the few good examples on how spend Percent for Art money on campus, is a wonderful connected stained glass circle which contains multiple subunits that illustrate various parts of the human body and concepts from chemistry — a perfect representation of what the students are learning about within the building. Additionally, this can be used as a marker to reiterate what the building is used for and can show a person who is not accustomed to campus what is done within the building.

Campus art should also strive to reflect its students, showing their struggle, their success and for many the loss that occurs during their time at university. For example instead of gigantic flowers to symbolize students growth, create an interactive piece of art that the students can participate in. A good idea for this would be a massive glass and wood container where students can submit something they are thankful for and then once a year, say springtime, have an opening day party where some of the submissions are read to students and faculty to celebrate the new season.

Future sculptures, paintings and other art should most importantly be completed by former or current students. If Western was to seek out and hire a former student of the Western’s College of Art, they are saying not only are our students worthy of a degree once they graduate but we also believe in their education to the point that they are equipped enough to leave an actual mark on campus. But more than anything, this says that Western not only is here to teach their students but they are here and willing to invest in their students something which is severely lacking currently.

So next time Art Committee of Western Oregon, let’s attempt to reflect your students and your campus to show that’s what’s important — not show your afterthought metal and LED marker of your misunderstanding.

 

Contact the author at pfdavis14@wou.edu

Photo courtesy of Paul F. Davis

Opinion: #WhyIDidntReport brings important conversation to light following Kavanaugh confirmation

Caity Healy | Editor-in-Chief

“‘How did you get home?’ ‘I don’t remember.’ ‘How’d you get there?’ ‘I don’t remember.’ ‘Where is the place?’ ‘I don’t remember.’ ‘How many years ago was it?’ ‘I don’t know.’”

These words were said on Oct. 2 by President Donald Trump, the supposed face of our nation, as he had the audacity to mock Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony given on Sept. 27. His remarks were met with a roaring crowd, applause and laughter.

Upon hearing his take on the situation, and the reaction of the crowd, I was disgusted — and I wasn’t alone in that. Even Brian Kilmeade of Fox News’s “Fox & Friends” stated, “Last night, he chose to blow it.”

On Oct. 6, following a rather short FBI investigation, Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed onto the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh, accused of sexual assault by Ford, was confirmed into a position that throughout history has had immense power over the laws and policies of the country. Someone who has been accused of sexual assault now has a say over what laws our country will follow.

This is a prime example of why people choose not to share their stories. An argument that several choose to use against Ford is, ‘why did you wait 36 years?’ Why she chose to wait is entirely her decision, one that she does not have to justify, and should not be used against her. But put yourself in her shoes: if your assaulter was about to confirmed into a position of high power, wouldn’t you want to speak up then too?

Why don’t people report their stories? Because when they do, they are mocked by the highest executive position in the country. Because when they do, they become hated by much of the country and even receive death threats. Because when they do, their accuser is still confirmed into the highest judicial position in the country.

In 2016, during Trump’s campaign, according to CNN, “at least 15 women accused Trump of misbehavior ranging from sexual harassment and sexual assault to lewd behavior around women.” Trump himself admitted that he has assaulted women, stating in 2005 that “…you can do anything … Grab them by the p****. You can do anything.”

Why don’t people report their stories? Because when they do, their accuser, despite their admittance to assault and despite the many who made allegations against them, still become the elected president of the United States.

Amidst the controversy surrounding the Kavanaugh allegation, many took to social media to use their voice under the hashtag, “#WhyIDidntReport.” Sharing stories that many struggle to ever make public, victims of sexual assault explained the reasons that they decided not to come forward. What that reason is differs for many, whether it be not having proof, feeling as if nobody would care or believe them, the fact that they were intoxicated when it happened, or for some, being convinced by others that it was not sexual assault. Whatever the reason, whether or not someone chooses to report is their own decision. If they decide to wait years, and then come forward, that is their decision as well. If they decide to never report it, that is their choice.

Recently, I reached out to a friend of mine who wished to remain anonymous, who has been a victim of two occurrences of sexual assault. She reported one, and chose not to report the other.

“I was confused — It was the guy I liked at the time, but it was obviously something I didn’t want. I didn’t know how to express (what happened). I blamed myself because he didn’t talk to me after that… I was more focused on if he still liked me or not,” stated anonymous source. This case happened in 2014, four years ago. Until recently, she had chosen not to tell anyone aside from close friends.

I didn’t even want to tell my counselor or therapist. I went through multiple (professionals),” the anonymous source said. “I really wanted to deny that it happened for some f****** reason. I just didn’t want to tell anybody.”

In early 2018, the anonymous source was assaulted again. This time, she decided that she wanted to report it.

“I reported him. But even then I called (to check on the case) twice a week for a whole month and I was always being redirected. I still haven’t heard from them yet. I kind of just… gave up. I felt like the sheriff department did not give a f***, they didn’t know what to do with that information. I still haven’t gotten justice,” the anonymous source commented.

This is just another example of why some choose not to report. It’s ultimately their choice. However, my anonymous source wanted to make it clear that while she didn’t feel like she received justice in her case, she wants people to know that they “shouldn’t be afraid to speak up. Whatever you’re stowing away inside or carrying, for me, telling someone really helps. I don’t feel that much trauma from the (case) that happened most recently because I talked about it several hours after it happened. But I feel like, whatever I’m carrying from the previous one, it’s full of shame and guilt and even if I (reported) I still have to carry around the four years I have not spoken about it.”

Know that for anyone who wants someone to talk to, or just wants someone to believe them, there are resources here on campus. Abby’s House, located in Room 106 of the WUC, is a center where anyone can go and share their story where they will be believed. They can also be contacted through phone at 503-838-8219.

 

Contact the author at chealy16@wou.edu

The reality of gym dress-codes

Caity Healy | Editor-in-Chief

Recently, I went back to the Health and Wellness Center for the first time since summer had ended. I was incredibly happy that it was finally open and I was excited to get back into a fitness routine, so I dressed in my favorite, most comfortable workout tank top — one that I had worn to this same location numerous times.

Mid-workout, I noticed an employee staring at me across the gym. I didn’t really think anything of it. However, at the end of my workout when I was stretching, he approached me and told me that what I was wearing was against dress-code.

At first, I was taken aback; I was wearing a tank top, leggings, and close-toed shoes, all of which seem normal for a gym. However, he then explained that my tank top specifically was against code as it means I could spread sweat more easily, and potentially spread disease.

Let me make myself clear, I am in full support of keeping students healthy and preventing the spread of disease. In this case, though, I felt as if this was something aimed more towards stopping students from dressing a certain way than towards stopping the spread of disease. Not once in my time here have I been told I’m breaking dress code while wearing a T-shirt but being sweaty. I have been to the gym multiple times with my boyfriend as he literally drips sweat from his clothing, and not one employee has even stared at him. Why me? It’s as if they only care about preventing a hypothetical spread of disease than doing something about the actual people drenched in sweat all around me.

On another note, aren’t you supposed to sweat at the gym? Isn’t that the point of the sanitizer and towels? When it comes down to it, if you sweat, at the place meant to get you sweaty, just clean it up.  

I’m not the only student who has been bothered by this new policy enforcement. Junior ASL/English Interpreting major Kaitlyn Allen was dress-coded for wearing a wide-strap tank top. In her opinion, this new code simply “is not reasonable. It will cause people to wear something they are really not comfortable working out in or it may potentially discourage people from going to the gym on campus.”

Overall, I’m not enraged at the employees or the policies of the Health and Wellness Center for dress-coding me. I appreciate that they are trying to keep their facilities as clean and disease-free as possible. My only request is that if you are going to dress-code me for wearing something that exposes more skin that could potentially get sweaty, then please just dress-code the ones who are also coated in sweat. Just keep it fair. Otherwise, I end up feeling singled out and awkward when I’m approached and stopped mid-workout to get a lecture from an employee, when in reality, there are other people they probably should be focusing more heavily on.

 

Contact the author at chealy16@wou.edu

Photo courtesy of Paul F. Davis

Nike under heavy fire

Lake Larsen | Sports Editor

The athletic apparel company Nike took a bold move on Sept. 4, by making controversial athlete Colin Kaepernick the face of the 30th anniversary of their “Just Do It” campaign. Following Kaepernick’s protest of the unfair treatment of minorities by kneeling for the national anthem, many saw Nike’s move as being anti-police, or anti-America. Because of this many, people took to Twitter, posting pictures and videos burning their Nike shoes and swearing to switch to using other athletic brands. These actions displayed that they would rather destroy their belongings than continue to support a company that does not align with their political beliefs. But where do they turn now?

If you choose to protest Nike’s stance by banishing your Jordans to a bonfire, what company will you choose to switch to? If the political stance of a company is so important to you that you will destroy the belongings that bear their name, whose name will you support?

The first thought you may have is to switch to one of Nike’s largest competitors, Adidas. Let’s think about the political history of Adidas. According to “Golden Kicks: The Shoes that Changed Sports”, it was founded in Germany in 1949 by Adolf Dassler. 16 years prior to founding Adidas, Dassler joined the National Socialist Party, also known as the Nazi party. So maybe choosing a shoe company that provided shoes to Hitler Youth isn’t the best new stance to align with.

The next company one might look to is Under Armour. Looking back into their past, Kevin Plank, the CEO of Under Armour, has come out and publicly endorsed Donald Trump after his controversial Muslim travel ban. This prompted a backlash from major sponsored athletes of Under Armour. According to the washingtonpost.com, Stephen Curry, Dwayne Johnson, and Misty Copeland all came out against Plank. These actions have resulted in dips in their sales, proving that aligning yourself with a divisive president isn’t the best political move.

The last major shoe brand one might switch to is Puma. However, Puma faces a familiar issue. Adolf Dassler, founder of Adidas and a member of the Nazi party, had a brother, Rudolf Dassler. Rudolf Dassler found success in the shoe business like his brother, and just like Adolf, he joined the Nazi party (“Golden Kicks.”) Meaning, Puma was founded by a Nazi just like Adidas.

But what if I told you there was a company founded in America by not one, but two veterans of the US Army? Men that built a brand from selling shoes from the back of their car? Based on alumni.stanford.edu, that company is Nike. The same company people deem “anti-military” was founded by veterans.

If you want to take the nationalist route of whining about a company supporting a person kneeling for their flag because it doesn’t stand for them, maybe look to who you’ll be supporting next. If Nike is a burden to their choices of endorsing Kaepernick, then Puma, Adidas and Under Armour are a burden to the political beliefs of their founders and CEOs. But in the end, buying and wearing shoes doesn’t represent your beliefs. Whining about it does.

 

Contact the author at llarsen13@wou.edu

Photo courtesy of nike.com

Editor’s note

Caity Healy | Editor-in-Chief

Welcome back, Western. Let’s be real — that summer just dragged on. I, for one, am so glad to be back. It’s finally my favorite time of year. Mornings become crisp, the leaves transition from vibrant summer hues to the warm shades of autumn, and there’s a sense of optimism amongst everyone. It’s a new season, and change is in the air. How we choose to embrace that change will affect our perspective on this upcoming term.

New changes are being welcomed with a warm embrace by myself and the rest of the staff here at The Western Howl. If you haven’t noticed by now, or if that last sentence wasn’t a blaring clue, we’ve rebranded. We’re no longer called The Western Journal. This was a decision made for a list of reasons — amongst these, our previous title being associated with a different news source that we have zero relation to  — but nonetheless, we are excited to share this moment in The Western Howl/The Western Journal/The Journal/Lamron, etc. history with the students of Western.

Ultimately, we are still the same paper we’ve always been since our inception in 1923. But 95 years and over eight name changes later, we were due for another change.

It’s a year of new and exciting changes for the paper, and likewise, a year a of new changes for myself. As the new Editor-in-Chief of this newssource, let me just make clear that I am nervous, thrilled, scared and overall, optimistic about the upcoming year. It’s a huge change for me to go from Lifestyle Editor to Editor-in-Chief, but I am ready to take on that challenge and give it every piece of me that I have. That being said, I’m not perfect. So, prepare to adjust into this new change with me as well.

I am choosing to embrace every adjustment that this paper is making. My staff and I are embracing the changes each and every one of us is making as we become comfortable in our new roles here at The Western Howl. Being comfortable with change is what makes life so exciting — I urge every one of you to go into this upcoming year with that same mindset. Who knows where it will take you.

Good luck with whatever is to come, Western. From your new Editor and the rest of the staff, we want to thank you for embracing this year of change with us.

 

Contact the author at chealy16@wou.edu

Photo courtesy of Paul F. Davis

Editor’s note

Zoë Strickland | Editor-in-Chief

If you would’ve told me a year ago that I would be writing the 2017-18 editor’s note, I would’ve thought you were joking. But, after nearly six months of being editor of The Western Journal, here we are.

This school year, for many, has been a year of change. We kicked off the academic year with fires that devastated parts of Oregon and California, changing both the landscape of the states and the places some call home. Throughout the last nine months, numerous Western organizations have begun locational changes the food pantry is moving across campus, the Student Activities Board is moving to the upstairs of the Werner University Center and the Stonewall Center is moving to where SAB was. At the end of this academic year, we’ll also be losing numerous retiring faculty and staff. People who, whether we’re aware of it or not, have impacted our time at Western.

For some students, myself included, a bigger change is on the horizon going into the world and trying to become an adult. Also, student loans.

Through all of these changes, The Western Journal has strived to be in the pit with you, reporting on things that matter to students whether that be the $4 million surplus in the university budget, the Wolves baseball team winning the GNAC title for the second year in a row, the latest theatre productions or local eateries in the area.

The paper is facing some changes of its own. In an effort to stay ahead of some copyright issues, as well as integrate a more ‘digital first’ mindset, the paper will be rebranding itself going into the 2018-19 school year. Starting next academic year, you will be able to find The Western Journal on campus under a different name The Western Howl. This is our first major name change since the ‘90s’s Western Star, and we’re excited to show you what we’ve got. This newspaper has been on campus since 1923, and we don’t plan to stop anytime soon.

Changes can be daunting, but as we all know, Wolves are resilient. As the world throws you curveballs that seem like a lot to handle, I implore you to embrace your inner wolf.

Thank you for sticking with us this year, dear reader.

 

Contact the author at zstrickland14@wou.edu

 

Following your own path

Sam Dunaway | News Editor

Now that graduation is right around the corner, everyone that I come into contact with asks the same exact thing — what’s next? And while I used to dread this question, I am starting to come to terms with the fact that there is no right answer.

As a biology major, it sometimes feels as though not striving for a master’s or doctorate degree is a huge mistake. I have a handful of friends leaving soon after graduation and continuing their education, and it often seems like finishing my educational career with an undergraduate degree is the wrong choice.

There are a few people in my life that urge me to stay in Oregon and focus on what’s familiar — notably the place I grew up. And although I know many graduates that feel most comfortable when they’re back where they came from, I’ve always known that I’m not one of those people.

While some of my friends are walking off of the commencement stage with a full-time position with a decent salary plus benefits, I know that this won’t be me either. Internships, seasonal jobs and minimum wage are in my future for the next few years, and I try to remind myself that this doesn’t mean that I’m a failure.

It means that everyone’s path is different. While it’s easy to look around you at commencement and compare yourself to every other graduate, everyone has their own unique path that’s right for them. No, I’m not going to be getting a doctorate anytime soon, I’m not going to have a stable income for a while and I’m not going to land my dream job right away, but that’s okay, because the road that I’m going down is the right one for me.

So, the next time you’re stressed about the right answer to the question ‘what’s next?’, stop and remember — you earned a degree. And the road beyond that degree is distinctly, wonderfully, unmistakably your own.

 

Contact the author at sedunaway13@wou.edu

 

Photo by: Paul F. Davis