Mount Hood

A Time for Change

By: Megan Clark
Campus Life Editor

A new year, a new start. This attitude inspires people to create lists of resolutions, both realistic and farfetched, that they hope to accomplish within the next year.

While good-intentioned, sometimes some goals don’t get checked off of that list. The common example of this is the hoard of people who flock to the gym after Jan. 1, and the few that remain as the year progresses.

That being said, there are those that fulfill their resolutions and probably have a happier year because of it.

What about the resolutions made by WOU students? What are they, and will students be successful in accomplishing them?

Jocelyn Chavez, junior anthropology major, said she wants to “work on [her] mental health and keep a planner so [she] can go to sleep on time.” She later mentioned that she wanted to find more hobbies and go on a trip to New York later in the year.

After a period of silence during which Chavez looked at her phone, she also stated she wants to “go on one Tinder date! Just one though.”

Going to the gym is another goal set by New Year’s resolutioners. Justin Oehler, a senior education major, said, “My resolution is to work out more. Super cliché, I know.”

“I am also trying to eat healthier, I am taking a health class this term and it helped reinforce that I need to get into better shape,” Oehler continued.

Mariah Williams, a senior interdisciplinary studies major, said that she wants to get “super healthy and in shape, and to learn how to be happy being single.” She also wants to be able to let go of anger from the past and find inner peace.

Will they be successful? Only time will tell! Keep an eye out for next week’s issue, where we’ll revisit our three intrepid New Year’s resolutioners and see how they’re faring.

Fear and Loathing

By: : Jack Armstrong 
Copy Editor

In the wake of the tragic events this month that shocked our world to its core, there is one question that is being asked over and over: Is it safe for me to resume my normal life?

People in Paris are worried that they cannot go out and gather in public places safely anymore, people in Colorado are worried that their clinics are no longer places of healing, and people all over are worried that they are next.

The message we hear from our politicians is largely unchanged from the aftermath of the September 11 attacks: be alert and aware, be safe, but above all else, be normal.

Normal is what shows those people who would do us harm that we are not afraid. Normal is what terrorism seeks to disrupt, and we must respond in kind.

For many, normal is simply leaving the house to go about their day, but for some of us, normal before the attack was travel, and specifically international travel.

The U.S. State Department has issued a warning to all American international travelers. While these warnings are not uncommon, they are often for singular countries that are experiencing different issues, but a worldwide alert like this is rare.

The warning begins, “Current information suggests that ISIL (aka Da’esh), al-Qa’ida, Boko Haram, and other terrorist groups continue to plan terrorist attacks in multiple regions.”

This is scary.

But that is the point of warnings: to be scary. If you read the rest of the warning (a whopping five paragraphs), it boils down to this: terrorists exist in all parts of the world; they could be planning to strike anywhere or anytime, but all we can do is gently suggest that travelers be vigilant.

Even though the whole warning is not as scary as the intro sentence might suggest, it’s still not great.

The fact that we have to issue this warning at all is not a great sign for the trend of peace on earth, but nowhere in the warning does it say “stay home.”

Before the most recent round of attacks, my wife and I were offered the chance to travel to Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates over winter break.

When we told our families, they were excited for us to go. Both of our families travel in their own right so this was nothing out of the ordinary, but then Paris and Beirut were attacked, the State Department released their travel warning, and our families changed their tune.

The enthusiasm was replaced with nerves, and what was the mild concern of any parent sending their child abroad shifted into full-blown panic. We wrestled with the possibility of delaying or canceling.
We are still going.

Does this mean that we are brave? No, brave is the refugees floating the Mediterranean. Does this mean we are taking a stand? No, Parisians took a stand by going to the England vs. France soccer match after the Germany vs. France game was attacked only days before.

This just means that we are returning to normal.

Normal isn’t just about doing your day-to-day tasks without fear, it isn’t even really about doing the out-of-the-ordinary without fear.

Normal is acknowledging that life is scary. Normal is the understanding that even without terrorism, simply stepping out of your house is dangerous. Normal is accepting that you cannot control much of anything, and you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

But normal is also acknowledging that life is beautiful. Normal is the understanding that even with the possibility of tragedy, stepping out of your house is always worth it. Normal is accepting that you cannot control anything, but you can control what you see and experience before your time is up.

Pets are not presents

pets as presents

By: Jenna Beresheim News Editor

I have always loved animals more than people.

There, I said it. Animals have always been a crucial part of my life, as I grew up on a farm constantly surrounded by them. My mother was also a dog trainer, and our dogs were always on their best behavior because of it.

As can be imagined, my animal rights and welfare soap box grew exponentially once I moved to WOU.

Because of animals, I volunteer at the Willamette Humane Society. Because of animals, I’m also a vegan.

I am a huge advocate for being an educated member of society, even if it’s hard to swallow. Especially when it’s hard to swallow. That’s when it matters the most.

Every time I volunteer at the Humane Society, it is a bittersweet experience. Upon stepping into the kennel, dogs either cower away, or rush at you to greet their sparse human contact with overwhelming glee.

The volunteers work every day to train these dogs up to their best potential, and find what works best for them.

When they’re gone, you miss them, but you know you have done your job well.

The worst part about volunteering at the Humane Society is the small, innocent looking paper slipped into a plastic cover on the front of the kennel. These are usually adorned with stickers and lots of exclamation points, outlined in a narrative from the pet-in-question’s perspective.

But these papers also tell you the animal’s age, their breed, and at the bottom, their reason of being in the shelter.

Far too many times I have paused to read these papers, only to discover reasons that make my head spin. I even distinctly remember a woman coming in to give her 8 week old puppy up for adoption, saying that she had “too much energy.”

Influxes happen naturally, especially around the holiday season, but not for the reason you would imagine.

There are often many animals brought to the humane society that were recently purchased as presents for the holiday season, whether for a spouse, a child, or another special person.

But these animals do not meet their expectations to some degree or another. Puppies grow up. They also cost an unholy amount of money, depending on which breed you purchase and just how much trouble they get into.

I have seen return reasons for puppies and kittens like “growing up” or “having too much energy,” for puppies “not being potty trained,” for dogs “that bark,” for people moving to a new place, and even for being too expensive.

When you welcome a new pet into your home, you are taking on a new life. Not a toy. Not something you can be bored of within the week, and certainly not something that will understand what they did wrong when you turn them over to a shelter.

Some of the most common places for animals to come from are the pet stores frequently found in malls and otherwise popular shopping places. More often than not, these puppies will boast purebred status or come from a breeder.

Here is where research comes in handy.

These high traffic stops also have a high risk of purchasing puppies from puppy mills. These mills focus on nothing more than the turnout of puppies to be sold for profit, and often play host to substandard conditions and an array of problems for the breeding parents.

Knowing this beforehand helps the potential adopter to ask crucial questions about where the dogs are from, if the breeder is reputable – the list goes on.

Again, knowledge is power. Many prospective pet owners snag the cutest thing on four legs and hightail it home with hopes of a happily ever after.

Researching the breeds beforehand and finding what is suitable for you and your household will help to find that perfect fit in the long run if you do decide to bring an animal into your home.

There is a wonderful series online that I cannot praise enough as a helpful, succinct research tool for pet parents needing insight. Animal Planet runs a mini-series called Pets 101, Dogs 101, and Cats 101.

Share the love

By: Megan Clark 
Campus Life Editor

Polyamory, a romantic relationship involving more than two people, gets a bad rap in most monogamous societies.

Due to a social climate that favors partnerships between only two people, individuals who want to practice polyamory are often stigmatized and shamed.

Like most things that branch away from the norm, polyamory is misunderstood and criticized.

Polyamory is not polygamy, an important distinction to make, as polygamy often conjures up images of fundamentalist compounds on the Canadian border thronging with sister-wives.

Polyamory simply means “many loves,” and involves entering into a relationship with more than one person. People remark on the morality, or lack thereof, of those involved in a polyamorous relationships, saying that it shows lack of commitment and desire for fidelity, which, of course, is untrue.

Possibly due to these misconceptions, polyamory is not overly common, though polyamorous relationships are increasing in popularity.

Some studies, like one done by Dr. Elisabeth Sheff, an educational consultant and the foremost academic expert on polyamory in the United States according to Psychology Today, have shown that polyamorous relationships have few negative impacts on children raised in polyamorous households.

The only harms possibly lie in growing too attached to a partner that might later leave, an issue present even in monogamous relationships, and having to face the societal stigma surrounding such an arrangement.

In addition to the normal issues encountered with monogamous relationships, polyamorous relationships feature many of the same ideals, such as consent, dedication, and, of course, love.

Since polyamory is not based on the perceived ownership of another, it alleviates feelings of jealousy; it is understood that love is shared between multiple people.

Polyamorous relationships allow for varied and greater emotional support.

There are benefits to having multi-partnered relationships that can’t be realized due to the negative attention polyamory receives.

This lifestyle is ultimately beneficial to those involved and harmless to everyone else, yet it is shamed and degraded because it doesn’t follow a certain set of values and norms.

Polyamorous relationships aren’t for everyone, but stigmas against polyamory ultimately restrict how others conduct their personal and romantic lives.

However, according to Tracy Giuliano, a psychologist at Southwestern University in Texas, “the more aware people were of polyamory, the more positive their attitudes were.”

With increased familiarity and awareness comes understanding and the acceptance of healthy lifestyle choices, such as polyamory, that go against the grain.

Happy holidays, taxpayers

By: Conner Williams 
Editor-in-Chief

It’s that time of the year again, time for everybody to get into the spirit of giving and show their appreciation for each other. So how do big businesses located in Oregon get into the holiday spirit?

By threatening to take their corporations, and the jobs that come with them, out of state if Oregon taxpayers don’t cut them a break.

Big businesses love Oregon, and we love having them here, for the most part.

They create local jobs that contribute to the growth of the state economy and provide an element of prestige to our state. I mean, how cool is it that Nike’s world headquarters are right up I-5?

But as much as we love having big businesses in Oregon, they love reminding us why they’re here: low taxes.

According to The Tax Foundation’s 2015 State Business Tax Climate Index, which is a collection of data that shows how well states structure their tax systems, Oregon ranked no. 12 on the list, and was ranked no. 4 in the sales tax rank category.

Since Oregon has relatively low property taxes for businesses and zero sales tax that businesses are partly responsible for covering, our quaint Pacific Northwest state has become a safe haven for businesses looking to turn some large profits.

So what do they do when faced with the potential for increased taxes? Threaten to leave, of course.

Our Oregon, a coalition that “fights for economic and social fairness for all Oregonians,” recently introduced a potential ballot measure that would increase state funds by an estimated $2.6 billion a year, money that is purported to be designated for schools and other services.

Many in favor of the potential measure say that the money generated could be used to pay off the majority of our crippling PERS debt, which is set to cost the taxpayers of Oregon billions come 2017.

But there is no clear indication yet of what the funds would explicitly be used for.

The tax is what is a called a gross receipts tax and would charge businesses to pay a tax rate of 2.5 percent on their Oregon sales that totaled $25 million or more.

The whole point of the proposed measure is to target larger chain businesses that also conduct sales outside of Oregon, such as large grocery stores and corporations like Nike and Intel. However, the measure claims that the tax would only be on sales that are made in Oregon.

The intent of the potential measure is a noble one; it charges large businesses that have seen huge profits in the state of Oregon from repeated tax breaks and leniency from taxpayers to begin to pay their fair share.

Corporations holding taxpayers hostage is a despicable act that has been seen before.

Think of sports franchises – billion-dollar corporations in their own right – that threaten to leave their respective cities if they do not get a new playing arena built, with the taxpayers footing the bill, of course.

It is also curious that a decision like this is being put forth as a potential ballot measure instead of one that is made in the state legislature, but I suppose that legislators don’t want to upset their corporate donors that help to ensure they get reelected.

It comes down to a simple question: on whom do the voters want to place the burden of our state’s financial woes?

Should the taxpayers continue to vote themselves into a hole, or should big corporations that use our state as a profit-haven be held accountable to pay their fair share back into the state in which their businesses thrive?

Musings from a woman on the edge

By: Katrina Penaflor 
Managing Editor

Good lord above, please put an end to these “glitter beards.”

Seriously, did I ever think I would utter a sentence about glitter beards out loud? No, I never did.

For those who aren’t aware, glitter beards are a new trend — a word I’m using very loosely — where men cover their beards in glitter.

Maybe because I myself do not have a beard, I can’t fully grasp the desire to douse facial hair in the cleanup disaster that are sparkly flecks of glitter, but none the less, all over social media I keep seeing it.

I even spent five minutes of my life watching a video of how to properly apply the glitter. Spoiler alert: there really is no trick, just apply oil and then glitter.

Now, the video was actually pretty hilarious because the guys making it were funny, but the entire time I kept thinking to myself, “The cleanup, good god it’s going to get all over the carpet!”

Then I had another equally terrifying thought that I had finally turned into my mother. Something I didn’t think would happen so soon, but alas, it has.

Maybe this trend is just another way to add to the sparkly holiday spirit?

And in all honesty if this is something anyone is seriously into or is desperate to rock at their next Christmas party, I’m not knocking your taste. You do you.

I’m simply typing to help organize my erratic mind full of odd thoughts.

Also, I’m curious as to how long the glitter will last, especially if applied to a large beard. I’m sure men will be finding remnants until next Christmas.

Maybe I just won’t get it until I dip my head in a bucket of glitter. Maybe that will be my enlightened moment, and my musings full of confusion will finally come to an end.

But until then, glitter beards, you will still continue to completely baffle me.

Jessica Jones” hits hard on Netflix

By: Ashton Newton 
Staff Writer

Earlier this year, Marvel’s cinematic universe got a new hero with Netflix’s original “Daredevil,” which added to the world of the Avengers with a darker, adult tone.

On Nov. 20, the follow-up, “Jessica Jones,” was released on Netflix to add to the new street-wise line-up.

These shows are two of four planned, with “Luke Cage” and “Iron Fist” coming at a later date, that will ultimately lead to The Defenders being formed and getting their own show.

Jessica Jones (Krysten Ritter, “Breaking Bad”) is an alcoholic private investigator with super strength and the power to jump really high as she tracks down her enemy Kilgrave (David Tennant, “Doctor Who”), who has the terrifying power of mind control.

Along the way, Jessica gets help from some familiar Marvel faces including Luke Cage and her best friend, Patsy Walker.

I personally loved the show. I enjoyed seeing how the reality of the Marvel cinematic universe isn’t truly all Asgardian rainbows and Avengers towers, and how people with abilities leave devastation and pain behind.

It is definitely a dark show, aimed at adults, but I think as a comic fan, and a fan of superhero movies, it was an extremely rewarding watch.

One of the coolest factors of the show is that being on the streets of New York with this super powered character shows that the citizens in Marvel’s cinematic universe are beginning to open up and accept the fact that there are people with abilities among them.

I think this is especially important to show with characters like Spiderman, Doctor Strange, and Captain Marvel being introduced into the universe soon.

The trailer was also released last week for the next Captain America movie, “Civil War,” which will be released in May of 2016.

The movie shows how a new piece of legislation limiting the powers of the Avengers and other people with super hero abilities divides our protagonists into two opposing sides.

It will be interesting to see if the repercussions of the movie affect Marvel’s street-level heroes like Daredevil and Jessica Jones as well.

“Jessica Jones” and “Daredevil” are both streaming on Netflix now, with “Daredevil” season 2 and “Luke Cage” coming in 2016.