Mount Hood

A new version of “The Talented Mr. Ripley” comes to Netflix

Escrito por: Claire Phillips | Redactora de Entretenimiento

Advertencia sobre el contenido: this article contains spoilers and mentions of murder.

Film fanatics may be familiar with the title “The Talented Mr. Ripley,” a thriller that stars Matt Damon, Gwyneth Paltrow and Jude Law in an unconventional love triangle. Netflix has taken on a noir remake of the story with the leading man played by Andrew Scott, who is well known for his roles in “Sherlock,” “Fleabag” and more recently, “All of Us Strangers.” The director’s choice to make the show in black and white was due to the original book cover by Patricia Highsmith. Set in the 1960s between New York and Italy, “Ripley” is a captivating story that is hard to look away from.

In addition to Scott, the new Netflix series also stars Dakota Fanning and Johnny Flynn. Each actor delivered a unique perspective to the remake of the classic story within their individual roles. The chemistry between the trio was undeniable.

Andrew Scott’s stoic performance as Tom Ripley gave the series its unsettling tone. In contrast to Matt Damon’s portrayal of the character, Scott plays Ripley as a calculated, apathetic man with little remorse for his actions. In the 1999 film, Ripley is more frantic after his murders and genuinely seems to be upset about his wrongdoings. Both interpretations are incredible portrayals of the multi-dimensional character, but the passiveness of Scott’s performance is almost terrifying to watch.

The most uncomfortable scene in the series was the practically silent 20-minute murder sequence of Greenleaf, as Ripley tediously and clumsily carries out his plan. The blood on Ripley’s fingers looks black, but the audience can see its unmistakable deep red color as they experience the brutal death of Dickie Greenleaf. Ripley goes on to steal Greenleaf’s identity for his wealth and status. 

Every few minutes there is a shot of religious art, whether it is Greek, Roman or Catholic, a statue or a painting on a church ceiling. Tom Ripley walks in the shadows of these works of art, and at some points, he silently ponders them. This could be interpreted as a higher power looking down at him as he continues to commit acts of sin, whether he chooses to acknowledge it or not. He views himself as the puppetmaster of everything around him, but truly knows he is on the verge of spiraling out of control. Characters such as Marge Sherwood, Dickie Greenleaf’s girlfriend, can see right through Ripley’s actions but have no way to prove his wrongdoings. Something is not quite right with him, which all the people he interacts with take notice of.

The juxtaposition of Tom Ripley’s character is what made the 1955 novel and the 1999 film unique. Though he is a con-man and murderer, the character is also described as a sensitive man. The 90s movie depicts Ripley as a queer man, in his odd relationship with Dickie Greenleaf, and even gives him a lover at the end of the movie. His acute awareness of the people around him is what makes him the enticing villain he is. 

With an all-star cast, unique filming style and an incredible setting, “Ripley” is a must-watch for any fans of the original film or audiences interested in the noir genre. The eight-episode show goes into more depth than the movie was able to, and it did not disappoint.

8/10.

Póngase en contacto con el autor en howlentertainment@wou.edu

El auge de los soportes físicos

Escrito por: Lili Minato | Autónomo

En 2023, Best Buy anunció que dejaría de vender DVD en 2024. Las ventas de DVD también han disminuido en los últimos 16 años, pero con el auge de la cultura fan, especialmente en las redes sociales, los DVD y otras formas de soportes físicos tienen la oportunidad de resurgir.

Las redes sociales han permitido a personas de todo el mundo establecer conexiones entre sí, especialmente cuando se trata del amor compartido por medios como el cine y la música. Dentro de estas comunidades, hay una presencia del comercialismo. Los artistas fabrican productos para vender a sus fans y la gente publica sus compras, como el descubrimiento de artículos nuevos o antiguos relacionados con los medios de comunicación. Es una parte importante de la cultura. 

El afán por comprar productos de los artistas favoritos permite a empresas como The Criterion Collection aumentar sus ventas. Criterion es una empresa que hace ediciones especiales de películas clásicas y contemporáneas. Venden DVD con carátulas y diseños nuevos; sus DVD suelen contener comentarios exclusivos, merchandising y escenas del director, lo que supone un gran reclamo para los fans. 

Incluso con nuevas empresas como Criterion, la compra de DVD nuevos sigue disminuyendo; esto puede deberse a que muchos aficionados dan una nueva vida a los DVD de segunda mano y antiguos. Cuanto más oscura es la mercancía, mejor resulta para los entusiastas devotos. También es muy rentable, teniendo en cuenta que muchos DVD sólo cuestan un par de dólares en una tienda de segunda mano.

Sin embargo, para algunos la compra de DVDs puede ser una pérdida de dinero debido a la accesibilidad de las películas a través de los servicios de streaming. Para muchos otros, sin embargo, la posibilidad de poseer su película favorita supera con creces el hecho de poder verla fácilmente a través de Netflix. 

En contraste con el descenso constante de las ventas de DVD, las de vinilos han aumentado rápidamente. En 2023, los estadounidenses compraron 49 millones de discos de vinilo, un 14% más que en años anteriores. Los vinilos también han superado en ventas a los CD de forma consecutiva en los últimos tres años. Los fans y las redes sociales han contribuido a este aumento. Los vinilos exclusivos con mercancía limitada en su interior han cautivado a los seguidores de músicos populares. 

Taylor Swift vendió la mayor cantidad de álbumes de vinilo en 2023. La base de fans de Swift es conocida por su obsesión con el merchandising, oficial o no, y con la combinación de eso y de que Swift vendió muchos CD y vinilos de edición limitada que incluían muchos tesoros en su interior -como fotos y pósters- no hay duda de por qué Swift conquistó las listas en esa categoría. 

Lo más probable es que los soportes físicos nunca recuperen su posición por encima de los servicios de streaming, pero para los aficionados a los medios populares y alternativos por igual, la propiedad personalizada siempre ganará a la comodidad y disponibilidad de las plataformas de streaming.

Póngase en contacto con el autor en lminato22@mail.wou.edu. 

El cambio de política de Netflix provoca el caos

Escrito por: Sierra Porter | Redactora

Netflix es un servicio estadounidense de streaming por suscripción creado en 1997 por sus fundadores Reed Hastings y Marc Randolph. En 2007, lanzaron su servicio de streaming para competir con Blockbuster, que implementó varios planes familiares diferentes. Últimamente, Netflix ha endurecido sus políticas de uso compartido de contraseñas y de hogar único, lo que lo convierte en una auténtica pesadilla para viajeros, familias numerosas y, especialmente, estudiantes universitarios.

El plan más barato es el plan estándar con anuncios que permite ver programas de TV y películas en dos dispositivos por $6,99. 

El plan estándar no tiene anuncios, es full HD, permite el acceso entre tres dispositivos y tiene la opción de añadir un miembro extra- por un coste adicional de 7,99 al mes. El plan premium también está libre de anuncios pero ofrece ultra HD, es accesible en cuatro dispositivos y tiene la opción de añadir dos miembros extra por $7,99 cada uno. 

La nueva posibilidad de añadir miembros con un coste adicional ha animado a Netflix a tomar medidas enérgicas contra el uso compartido de contraseñas fuera de un mismo hogar. Esto significa que si alguien intenta iniciar sesión en su cuenta de Netflix fuera del hogar designado, se desconectará a todos los demás miembros; independientemente de si todavía está dentro del límite de dispositivos. Esta política parece un intento desesperado de ganar dinero, ya que obliga a los usuarios a contratar planes más caros o a pagar costes adicionales. 

¿Por qué supone esto un cambio de juego para tantos? Para muchos estudiantes, la experiencia universitaria completa incluye vivir en las residencias, pero eso también significa que todos los fondos suelen destinarse a esos gastos. Muchos estudiantes afirman que se ven obligados a prescindir de sus planes familiares durante los meses que están en el campus, ya sea porque se ven obligados a vivir sin los servicios de streaming o porque tienen que pagar el coste adicional de ser un miembro más. 

Los viajeros ávidos también se enfrentan a este problema de vez en cuando, ya que pierden la posibilidad de conectarse a Netflix en los muchos lugares en los que se alojan mientras viajan. Una vez más, uno tendrá que desconectar al resto de la familia en el hogar y hacer frente a la ira de los derechos de streaming rabia, bola hasta las tasas adicionales o abandonar Netflix en general. 

Este cambio de política ha sido un dolor para muchos y hasta 62% de los prestatarios de contraseñas dijeron que preferirían dejar de utilizar el servicio de streaming en total antes que adquirir su propia cuenta. El intento de Netflix de obligar a los espectadores a comprar sus servicios, especialmente los más caros, no ha tenido hasta ahora el éxito esperado. Inmediatamente después de estos cambios, Netflix perdió casi 1,2 millones de abonados, su mayor pérdida en más de una década. 

Muchos están cancelando sus suscripciones y cambiándose a otros servicios de streaming, y no podemos culparles. 

Póngase en contacto con el autor en howlstaffwriter@wou.edu

Un cambio para el entretenimiento

Escrito por: Taylor Duff | Freelancer

Back in March of 2023, an article was released called “Writers are not keeping up” — published by the Writers Guild of America contract. This article was the start of the Writer’s Strike, expressing how writers are feeling devalued and objectified in harsh work environments, including tiny rooms and decreased pay as well as being overworked. 

The demand for writers is based on the switch to streaming from many if not most, entertainment channels. Because of the high demand, another complaint is the lack of experienced writers being hired to fill the gaps — with below or bare minimum pay giving the green light to have an excuse to pay less. 

Writers have also stated they have felt like second class to the actors and directors — being undervalued in the workplace despite doing double the amount of work and hours.

As a result of this strike taking place, the Screen Actor Guild also went on strike, and actors across all platforms made statements and interviews about the unfair treatment and harassment of their writers and staff. 

Actors such as Amanda Seyfried, Rob Lowe and Wonda Sykes all stood in solidarity with the writers during the protest. One main reason the actors joined the strike with the writers was to address the use of AI versions of themselves; using their likeness for gain in media. The SAG strike lasted until Nov. 9 of this year, meaning both WGA and SAG strikes are now over. WAG reached a tentative agreement with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers back in September, and slowly but surely, they reached an agreement with the Screen Actors Guild as well. 

As for what this means for entertainment, the agreement is effective in protecting writers and giving proper residuals for international viewing. Due to streaming becoming the new wave of entertainment, the agreement takes effect now giving proper pay toward its writers with the royalties standing in their favor. 

Many movies will be delayed due to the strike shutting down production studios, with many directors and producers walking out. TV shows may resume, but will also be pushed back for months without new episodes. As for actors, the agreement gives them more security knowing they are protected against their likeness being used. 

As for the future of entertainment, the WGA contract term will be in effect until May 2026 — keeping in effect this protection for the people behind the entertainment consumed.      



Póngase en contacto con el autor en tduff23@mail.wou.edu

La comedia romántica interactiva de Netflix cambia el juego de las comedias románticas

Escrito por: Claire Phillips | Redactora de Entretenimiento

Advertencia sobre el contenido: este artículo contiene spoilers

Three handsome, single men are fighting for a young woman’s affection… Now, the woman’s dilemma has become choosing just one — the current lawyer boyfriend who just proposed, the famous rockstar or the schoolteacher with a history? Such is the predicament of Cami Conway, the protagonist of the Netflix hit, “Choose Love.”

What separates “Choose Love” from other modern romantic comedies is that the viewers have a say in choosing the perfect man for Cami. Watch with friends and they will be fighting over the remote to pick either Paul, Rex or Jack. 

Karis D’Orazio, a sophomore at Western and a rom-com fan, said she appreciated this aspect. “You got to pick the guy you liked, instead of watching the whole movie with a guy you didn’t like,” D’Orazio said.

A fun aspect of the movie is that the viewers may go back and undo their choices to receive different endings. The movie has six different endings depending on the decisions the viewer makes on behalf of Cami, however, the many options “took away from the story a little,” said D’Orazio. “You didn’t feel that fulfillment that you feel when you usually watch a rom-com.”

Fans of “Choose Love” have utilized popular social media apps, such as TikTok, to recommend it to others. “It popped up on my For You Page enough for me to be like, okay, I’m going to go look at this movie,” D’Orazio said. Watchers have shared what they would have changed about the movie to make it more enjoyable: “I feel like it could have been a series instead of a movie. You didn’t get to know the characters very well,” said D’Orazio.

This movie is just a gateway for the other interactive content Netflix has to offer. If a rom-com doesn’t resonate, there are interactive adventure, horror and animated shows. These shows and movies can generate feelings of authority in times when everything seems out of control. 


Póngase en contacto con el autor en howlentertainment@wou.edu

Titular: Campeones contra campeones

Análisis de las actuaciones de Navarro y Trinity Valley en el College Daytona de la National Cheer Association

Jude Bokovoy | Editor de estilo de vida

 

Póngase en contacto con el autor en howllifestyle@wou.edu

 

This article contains spoilers for competition results and season two of “Cheer.”

Navarro cheer team is one of the most well known collegiate cheerleading teams in the U.S. Navarro can be easily recognized by their sparkly red and black uniforms, incredible stunting abilities and team spirit. In 2020, Netflix released a documentary about Navarro’s road to reach the National Cheerleaders Association National Championship in Daytona Beach, Florida, called “Cheer.” The show and the team’s execution of their routine was a major success. Navarro was named the 2019 National Champion in Daytona’s advanced large coed junior college division. 

Daytona is NCA’s Collegiate Dance and Cheer Competition. To be able to participate in Daytona, each team needs to qualify by either getting bid on at an NCA camp or approved by sending in a video. Cheerleading teams come from all over the country to experience and compete in the notorious Daytona.

This January, the second season of “Cheer” was released that included their rivals, Trinity Valley Community College. Throughout the season, they went back and forth showing how each team prepared for Daytona, as well as the ups and downs throughout the season. Both teams were incredibly talented and had viewers on their toes, wondering who was going to be the 2021 National Champions. TVCC ended up placing first, stealing Navarro’s national title. 

Although both of these teams are located in Texas, they couldn’t be more different. Days before Daytona, many competing teams performed a showcase of their routines for their friends, families and fans. At TVCC’s Daytona showcase, the camera crew made it clear that they were only focused on certain individuals, by exclusively filming certain cheerleaders as they were executing their skills. Their routine was extremely tumble heavy leaving viewers in awe, however it seemed they were more focused on the individual spotlight rather than working as a team. It didn’t go unnoticed that many of them did not smile during the duration of their performance. 

The Navarro routine was team-based. Everyone had a smile on their face and they were energetic while performing their fluid routine. Navarro’s baskets and transitions were jaw dropping. As always, their choreography lit up the mat. What these two teams had in common were the high magnitude of tumbling, stunts and ambition. 

This year TVCC decided to enter into the advanced small coed division, meaning that they did not end up competing against Navarro. During the weekend of April 6 – 10, NCA’s Daytona provided each team two days to perform their routine twice in hopes of taking home a trophy. 

Throughout TVCC’s day one performance, their tumbling was clean but the stunts were not. There were many shaky dismounts, two stunts needed to be saved and the center group for their main pyramid fell. TVCC made a comeback on day two; their team jump combo was level throughout the team, the baskets were very high and the center tumbler had lots of energy. Unfortunately in the same middle stunt group, the flyer slipped during the pyramid. While making their final exit on day two, each member of the team did actions towards the crowd of an “I’m the best” mentality, iconic of the individualistic mindset that is rampant in TVCC.

On the other hand, Navarro blew it out of the park for both days’ performances. On day one, their beginning tumbling sequences were intense, all of their pyramids were executed well and included elaborate transitional stunts. On day two, all of their one-man stunts were solid; they nailed their first jump combo of a toe touch to a b-twist and they performed choreography with enthusiasm. The only notable flaw from Navarro was during one of their pyramids in which well known athlete Gabbi Butler slipped but regained balance while doing the choreography. When Navarro left the mat on day one and two they all hugged each other and exited as a supportive team.

At the end of the day, both TVCC and Navarro executed their intense routines very well. Both included elaborate baskets, jump combinations, tumbling and pyramids; because of their determination and skill Navarro and TVCC went home as the 2022 National Champion for their respective divisions.

Popular movies and TV coming to streaming

The critically acclaimed media coming to Netflix, Disney+ and Hulu this October 

Camille Lenning | Editor de entretenimiento

Classes are back in session, which can mean more stress for students. For those who need a break from homework, here’s a sneak peek into some of the critically acclaimed movies and television shows coming to streaming services this October. 

Coming to Netflix:  

  • “Seinfeld” (1989) ⏤ Oct. 1. All nine seasons of the famous sitcom featuring Jerry Seinfeld, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Jason Alexander and Michael Richards. Rotten Tomatoes score: 89%. 
  • “Till Death” (2021) ⏤ Oct. 1. A romantic lake house vacation turns deadly when Emma’s husband enacts a revenge plot against her. Rotten Tomatoes score: 88%.
  • “On My Block” (2018) ⏤ Oct. 4. Two years after Monse’s departure from Freeridge, the group is back together, and this final season will explore their changed dynamic as they navigate new threats in the neighborhood. Rotten Tomatoes score: 95%. 
  • “YOU” (2018) ⏤ Oct. 15. In season three, Joe and Love are raising their newborn son in a Californian suburb. But when Joe’s attention shifts to their next door neighbor, Love must take drastic measures to protect her perfect family. Rotten Tomatoes score: 90%. 

    Coming to Disney+:

    • “Black Widow” (2021) ⏤ Oct. 6. Natasha Romanoff must confront her dark past as an assassin — and the people she left behind — when a new foe arises. Rotten Tomatoes score: 79%. 
    • “Marvel’s What If…?” (2021) ⏤ Oct. 6. Marvel’s newest addition to their growing media arsenal comes to a close in the finale episode. Rotten Tomatoes score: 93%. 

    Coming to Hulu:

    • “Crimson Tide” (1995) ⏤ Oct. 1. Set after the Cold War, a rookie lieutenant commander of the submarine USS Alabama stages a mutiny to prevent the captain from starting a nuclear war with Russian extremists. Rotten Tomatoes score: 88%. 
    • “Escape from Alcatraz” (1979) ⏤ Oct. 1. Frank Morris, a criminal with a reputation for breaking out of prison, is sent to Alcatraz and crafts a plan to escape the inescapable. Rotten Tomatoes score: 96%.
    • “Goldfinger” (1964) ⏤ Oct. 1. When gold magnate Auric Goldfinger is suspected of concocting a scheme to rob Fort Knox and cripple the world economy, 007 must foil the plot. Rotten Tomatoes score: 99%. 
    • “Grey’s Anatomy” (2005) ⏤ Oct. 1. The season 18 premiere will feature the doctors at Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital treating patients after the COVID-19 pandemic, and introduce new obstacles as they try to employ doctors. Rotten Tomatoes score: 84%. 
    • “Mad Max” (1979) ⏤ Oct. 1. In a world where oil shortages have led to famine, war and financial crisis, police officer Max goes rogue to avenge his murdered wife and son. Rotten Tomatoes score: 90%. 
    • “The Hunger Games” (2012) ⏤ Oct. 1. Every year, the Capitol picks two children from each assigned district to join a bloodthirsty competition. When Katniss Everdeen volunteers to save her sister, her life is changed forever. Rotten Tomatoes score: 84%. 
    • “Waitress” (2007) ⏤ Oct. 1. Waitress Jenna is married to an abusive husband and stuck in a small town, with plans to escape ⏤ but complications arise when she begins an affair with the town doctor. Rotten Tomatoes score: 89%. 

    Póngase en contacto con el autor en entertainmenteditor@thewesternhowl.com