Mount Hood

The artifice of artistry

Darien’s Column:
Author: Darien Campo | Designer

Deck: Are independent musicians putting too much focus on image before talent?

Everybody wants to act like Kanye, but nobody wants to work like Kanye.

These words have been bouncing around my head for almost a month now. I encountered the phrase on a Reddit thread started by an independent artist who was dissatisfied with the amount of attention his work was getting. He ranted, saying that he had worked hard for his craft and he deserved to have a larger fanbase by now – but nobody was listening to his tracks. A couple of users, myself included, tried to engage in conversation with him and have a discussion, only to be met with more anger and sarcasm. He didn’t want excuses, he didn’t want advice, and he didn’t want strategies; he wanted results.

This attitude is so prevalent in the independent scene.

As a musician, I’ve dealt with countless bands and artists who are just starting out but never get past this hump. We see online are bands who rocket into stardom and are showered with fans from day one. What we don’t see are the years of work that go into being a musician – or any kind of artist, for that matter.

There’s an attitude of entitlement that so many independent artists develop. This idea that “I am a musician, therefore I deserve attention for my craft.” If this is your outlook, you’ll never get far as an artist. Being a musician is hard work, it’s exhausting, it’s unrelenting, and it’s unforgiving. You have to do it because you love it, even if nobody’s listening.

I produced for a band some years ago who developed their rockstar attitudes long before they ever developed their musical talent. They would say, “we need the right equipment,” “we need top-of-the-line recording software,” “we need more Facebook likes,” before they would ever worry about their actual music. Being a band was an image for them, and that was satisfactory enough. They never felt the need to delve any deeper into their musical voice.

This artifice of artistry is what holds so many independent musicians back from discovering their true potential as a creator. It’s easy to act like Kanye, so many artists do, but it’s much harder to put in the amount of time and effort that Kanye does. That’s why Kanye gets to act the way he acts; because he works harder than you could ever imagine.

Contact the author at dcampo13@wou.edu

Ashton’s Column:
Author: Ashton Newton | Entertainment Editor

Deck: The media and the entertainment industry have had a negative effect on the stereotype of the musician.

Everybody wants to act like Kanye, but nobody wants to work like Kanye.

The entertainment industry tends to idolize Kanye and other artists for their arrogance and extravagance, without noting the hard work that they put in. This affects how people view musicians in general, and it’s making negative marks on the music industry and the mindset around it.

Movies and television often show musicians as being super cool, rebellious and very arrogant. Kids shows such as “Drake and Josh” and “Big Time Rush” showed kids that looking and being cool as a musician is more important than the music you create, which has helped to create an expectation as to how musicians are supposed to act.

I’ve seen this in local musicians, in interviews and in the behavior of popular musicians. One notable example was when Green Day’s Billie Joe Armstrong freaked out at the iHeartRadio Music Festival due to wanting more time to perform. Jack White also got angry at the crowd when they weren’t cheering enough and he walked out of a sold out show after 45 minutes.

This behavior doesn’t help the stereotype, and it’s bleeding down into the local music scene, too. While talking to and interviewing artists, many people want to skip over the concept of working hard and jump straight into the idea of being the arrogant, super cool musician, even when they don’t have fans.

No one is going to want to work with an artist who is difficult to be around, much less someone who can’t get over the arrogant mindset. No one is going to act like a jerk, win a battle of the bands and then get instant stardom. That’s the plot of “School of Rock,” and it’s time to get your head out of the clouds and act like a good person first and foremost.

Ending this “rockstar” stereotype in movies and television, not romanticizing performers who are obvious arrogant jerks and working hard rather than instantly acting like a celebrity are so important for the music industry and the mindsets surrounding it.

Labeling yourself as a musician gives you nothing. Putting in the effort that someone like Kanye does is the side of the industry that so many artists are ignoring. Whether music is a passion or a hobby, acting like Kanye without working like Kanye won’t get anyone anywhere and continues to send the industry into a spiral of arrogance.

Contact the author at anewton15@wou.edu

Office of the President Guest Column

By:  Rex Fuller
President of Western Oregon University

The April 12 edition of the Western Journal included an article responding to an email I sent to faculty and staff about our next budget. I’d like to take this opportunity to provide students with some context and background.

First and most importantly, I want our objective to be clear that at Western Oregon University we aim to provide a transformative education for our students at an affordable price. As we work to achieve that goal, increasing tuition is always our last resort.

That brings me to my recent letter to Western’s faculty and staff. In it, I explained our current budget situation and the likelihood that the Legislature will not be able to provide the funding for the recommended budget all seven universities presented to the Higher Education Coordinating Committee in 2016. We are considering three areas in which to make up financial shortfalls: cutting budgets, tapping one-time reserve funds and raising tuition. In my next guest column, I will share more about these areas, this week my aim is to provide students with additional information about why we have a shortfall.

Some background, the Higher Education Coordinating Committee is responsible for distributing state funds to higher education. It is a complex funding system, so I’ll just paint a broad picture. Today, the state provides slightly over 22 percent of our budget while tuition accounts for nearly 70 percent.

To put that shift in context, consider this: in 2007, Oregon’s seven public universities received about $692 million from the Legislature.
10 years down the road, the 2017 number as proposed is $667 million. So Oregon universities are receiving millions less in support from the state at the same time that we are serving more students and mandatory costs related to operations have increased.

Ultimately, the way in which Oregon financially supports its public universities has changed significantly in the past decade, and money is much harder to come by. In 2016, Oregon ranked 37th nationwide in terms of financial support for public higher education, up from 45th in 2015. The question remains, is this a blip or will the legislature maintain their investment?

I invite all of our students to get involved in the fight against tuition increases. If you are an Oregon resident, please contact your legislative representative to voice your concerns.

Joining our voices can make a difference for Oregon higher education because together we succeed.

Contact the author at president@wou.edu

The unspoken ramifications of being on social media

By: Zoe Strickland
Managing Editor

As a college student who’s almost constantly looking at new jobs and updating her resume, it’s become more apparent that possibly employers want you to disclose your social media handles. But what are the ramifications of social media becoming more integrated into both personal and professional culture?

It’s becoming more essential to have and update social media accounts but, for some people, time spent on social media can be damaging to mental health.

Humans always want to put their best foot forward; and it’s easy to do that from the privacy of a computer screen. Social media platforms, particularly Facebook, have become personal museums of careful curation. There’s hardly a day where I can go without someone in my family asking me if I saw what so-and-so posted on their profile.

Taking time to make sure that an online presence is a perfect and impressive representation of who someone is can be stressful for both the people posting and the people reading the posts. The curation of social media presents a false sense of positivity, while also resulting in an atmosphere where one person is more likely to compare their life to the lives of the people around them.

In the NPR “Hidden Brain” podcast episode “Schadenfacebook,” a similar idea is discussed.

“As you watch the seemingly idyllic lives of your friends on social media, you may find a voice pointing out that your vacations are dull by contrast … that your relationships seem to be painted in gray, while everyone else’s seem to be in technicolor,” said “Hidden Brain” host Shankar Vedantam.

In a 2015 study done by Ottawa Public Health, researchers found that teenagers who spent more than two hours on social media reported having decreased mental health compared to teenagers who spent less time engaged in social media.

Social media is exhausting; with a blinking light in the corner of a phone, it’s easy to get sucked into reactions and posts and comments.
Being constantly alert and ready for social interaction- even when engaging over the internet- takes a mental toll. The brain needs time to rest.

As someone who recently took major social media websites off of her phone, I can speak to the fact that life becomes significantly less stressful when disengaging with social media websites; even if that means taking an app off of a phone and only going on social media when sitting at a computer.

As I got used to not having the applications on my phone, there was less of an impulse to check-in and see what everyone was doing. Because this impulse slowly started to go away, I became less aware of what my friends were posting; and therefore less stressed about how my life measured up. My Facebook feed is full of people from high school and college who are getting engaged and having babies; comparing my life to their feed will help nobody.

People tend to either drift closer to the social media sphere or pull themselves almost completely out of it; the first demands significant amounts of brain space, while the latter is routinely looked down upon.

The world is becoming a place where people are forced to either engage with every fiber of their being or not at all – it just depends on how much of their own mental space they’re willing to give up.

Contact the author at zstrickland14@wou.edu

The importance of foreign language

By: Ashton Newton
Entertainment Editor

I first started learning French as a first-year student in high school. My initial reasons were just because I thought it was cool, but years later, I’ve grown to value the experiences and opportunities that I’ve had from studying French.

Through studying French, I’ve had the opportunity to meet a lot of new people. This summer I hosted a French student named Andrea and it was an extremely valuable experience. I was able to gain insight into another culture that I wouldn’t have been able to without studying French.

At Western, I’m on my second year of French and I’ve found the program to be very rewarding. As someone who aspires to travel in the future, having knowledge of French language and culture will be valuable.

Foreign language at Western isn’t only about the language; it’s about the culture, too. Having a better understanding of other cultures around the globe creates more well-rounded and culturally understanding students.

Western’s announcement that departments are seeing 5-10 percent budget cuts across the board puts the foreign language department at risk of seeing some serious upcoming cuts.

Western offers Spanish, American Sign Language, French and German. With French and German being the two smallest departments of the four, they’re at risk of being cut. My experiences with foreign language at Western aren’t the only positive ones.

Jill Ketcham, sophomore early childhood education major, is currently in her first year of German and it has already made positive impacts on her life.

“Considering I went to Germany, it has made me appreciate what I saw more and it’s made me want to learn more about the culture. Now that I’ve been learning it and I have a background, I’ll learn way more when I go back,” said Ketcham.

I believe that French and German are both important to Western and have made many positive impacts on students’ lives. Cutting them would result in losing a great opportunity to gain insight into other cultures. With cultural diversity being something Western prides itself on, this would be a great loss.

Foreign language experience makes potential candidates for employment much more desirable. Whether it be any of the languages Western offers, experience studying a foreign language can open many doors in the future, especially in the fields of government, business, law, medicine and technology, as those are all fields with a growing international presence.

“[Spanish] is more applicable in the US right now, but what I know about French is when you learn French, you learn a lot about English as well. You learn a lot of vocabulary, you learn about a different culture, you learn about different ways to think about things. What’s useful professionally isn’t always what’s useful for you personally.
People are different and they need to have different possibilities.”
said Professor Maguelonne Ival, who teaches second and third year French at Western.

According to the American Council on the teaching of foreign languages, learning a foreign language has many positive impacts on study habits and learning. Their website, actfl.org, is a great resource about all the benefits of learning a foreign language, including increased linguistic awareness, memory and reading skills and citing scientific journals and studies done over the last 50 years.

Having a wide array of foreign languages to study is great for Western students’ opportunities to gain insight into other cultures and increase their success in other classes.

Protecting French and German from being cut is important for the university’s international programs. There are many study abroad opportunities available through studying French and German, which only require a year or two of studying the language, that would be lost with a cut as well.

Studying French has been a large part of my college experience, and I’m not alone. French and German are both important departments for Western and I believe that losing them would be a big loss for the foreign language department and the school as a whole.

Contact the author at anewton15@wou.edu

So what’s this about a star war?

By: Ashton Newton
Entertainment Editor

“Star Wars” is easily one of the most important parts of my life. I’ve been watching those films since before I can remember. My Christmas tree is mostly “Star Wars” ornaments, my bookshelf is covered in the novels and my Lego collection is not the kind I’d show a girl after a first date.

I frequently get asked what I think the best “Star Wars” film is and it usually breaks into a long, passionate rant. It’s time to set these opinions in stone.

The best film in the franchise is “Episode V: Empire Strikes Back.” This film has it all: intense battle scenes, compelling characters, a huge expansion of the “Star Wars” universe and one of the most intense plot twists in movie history. “Empire Strikes Back” is dark, iconic and easily the best “Star Wars” film around.

My second favorite is an unpopular opinion. I think the second best “Star Wars” film is “Episode III: Revenge of the Sith.” The writing is atrocious, the acting is almost worse and Lucas’ vision didn’t quite translate to screen the way he wanted, but that doesn’t change the fact that “Revenge of the Sith” is a huge, beautiful film in the Universe that I love oh-so-much.

I don’t watch “Star Wars” because it’s a well written piece of art, I watch “Star Wars” because I love the politics, I love the history, I love the mystery. I believe that “Revenge of the Sith” is a beautiful bridge between the prequels and the original trilogy that expands the Universe more than any other film did.

The third best is “Episode IV: A New Hope.” One must give credit where credit is due. “A New Hope” is a simple film, but one that shaped this entire trilogy and my life. Compared to the other films, it’s very small but without it there would be no “Star Wars.”

Tied for fourth is “Episode VI: Return of the Jedi” and “Episode VII: The Force Awakens.” These are both great films with huge flaws. “Return of the Jedi” is repetitive with the second Death Star. Also, it irritates me that the Galactic Empire is taken down by a bunch of cute tree bears. The film doesn’t finish out the series as largely as I would want and that definitely brings it down.

“The Force Awakens” is also a really great movie that brings in new characters and revamps the series. My problem with it is that it is essentially a redone “New Hope.” A group of people, against all odds, work together to destroy a giant planet-killing superweapon. I really didn’t need to see that a third time.

The worst two films are “Episode I: The Phantom Menace” and “Episode II: Attack of the Clones.” Scientifically explaining the force, romantic subplots, Jar Jar Binks and overdone politics make for a pretty lackluster two movies.

There are some great parts of those films though. Seeing the Jedi in all their glory is extremely satisfying and characters like Count Dooku and Jango Fett went down as instant classics. The novelizations are also very well-written and help to fix some of the things that the films got wrong. On my movie watching list, however, they sit at the bottom.

My honorable mention is the most recent spinoff movie “Rogue One.” Overall, “Rogue One” is a mundane film that is easy to fall asleep to in the first hour, but the last act of the movie puts the “War” in “Star Wars” more than any other film does.

The stakes are high and remain feeling high, the loss feels real and tragic and the action scenes are dark and intense. Before “Rogue One,” battle scenes never felt very intense. Mostly because it’s obvious that the main characters would survive and good would win. “Rogue One” blurs those lines a bit and makes for a great battle sequence.
“Star Wars,” to me, is the most exciting fictional Universe around. The lore is rich with mystery and there are hundreds of doors that could be opened. Whether the film is good or not, all “Star Wars” movies are important and help to create one of the best series in entertainment.

Contact the author at anewton15@wou.edu

Cowboys aren’t a myth, I’ve seen them

By: Burke De Boer
Sports Editor

It has been explained to me a few different times over the past couple of years that there is no such thing as a cowboy.

It was a myth, created by wild west carnival shows who ripped off Hispanic culture. If there were any people that could be called “cowboys” or “cowgirls,” they only existed for a few decades in the 19th century. And they certainly weren’t white.

Being from a town that dubbed itself “The Cowboy Capital of Oregon,” I was a bit shocked to hear all this.

The explanation, often given to blow the minds of the audience with revisionism, takes the history of western expansion and astonishingly oversimplifies it. The idea is that Mexicans were in the west before Americans and did all the work before the American government stole the land. Eventually, touring shows made up the idea of gunslinging western icons and it was their lie that captured the imagination of the Americans.

Of course it is true that Mexican vaqueros raised cattle on the high plains before American cowboys did, but when people say that the English word “buckaroo” is a corruption of the Spanish “vaquero” they conveniently forget that this would require English speakers to be in the west to adopt the term.

The English speakers adopted much of their vernacular and techniques from the Spanish. And they also learned a lot from the Native tribes that had developed their own horse cultures. This is important to remember when we consider the history of the west.

And it’s equally important for the contemporary culture of the west. Because history is not some closed book. I like to think of history as the genealogy of a culture – it allows you to see where a people and their customs come from.

I grew up alongside a lot of Chicano kids, many of whom went on to work ranches and farms in Central and Eastern Oregon. My father went to high school and worked on ranches on a Shoshone-Paiute reservation. Raising agricultural prosperity from the desert was a tough business and a diverse array of tough people took up the task.

Yet some say the cowboy is dead, that with the invention of barbed wire fences, which quickly spread across the west, the cowboy disappeared.

The duty of the ranch hand had been keeping the owner’s livestock on the owner’s land, a duty now fulfilled by grids of fenceline.

But that’s only true most of the time. I remember on more than one occasion as a child when the phone would ring in the middle of the night; a neighbor calling that our cows were out, or their cows were out and they would like some help.

It’s very rare that automation actually kills an industry, or even a specific job within that industry. Ranching has certainly not been hurt by automation. At the end of the day, humans are needed should fences fail. At the start of the day, humans are needed to put the fences up.

And fences aren’t even a universal rule.

I’m not sure if this happened before I was born or when I was simply too young to remember it, but my father still brings it up regularly; sometime after he came in from the range and got a job in town, Pop and his brother-in-law were hired by a coworker at the mill to cut a bull calf; so, they drove up to his little house on the mountainside to do some castrating. They found that the bull in question could barely be called a “calf” anymore, and this big old boy was penned up in a corral that was half made out of broken appliances.

The notion that the range is settled, whether by fence or any other means, hits its biggest snag when you consider the Bureau of Land Management.

Ranchers need as much range and pasture as they can get. Enter the BLM land lease system, where ranchers buy permits and leases to range rights.

The BLM office in my hometown presides over 284 leases a year, and another 122 permits.
The most of any in the state; and yet people say Pendleton’s the real cowboy capital.
They also maintain land for recreation such as offroading, and administer one of the state’s 17 wild horse management areas.

It’s a lot of ground to cover.

A calf without an ear tag or brand is open game to illicitly tag and sell. Furthermore, bears, cougars and the recently reintroduced wolves pose threats to unguarded cattle.
And most outfits birth their calves in January and February – which gives them the entire spring and summer to grow, but are also born into prime blizzard months. Mama cows will leave weak calves to freeze in the drifts.

Without men and women patrolling the livestock, any number of these misfortunes would befall them. These ranch hands will be needed as long as people eat beef.

The men and women working any industry will reflect the society they live in. It’s all a matter of demographics, and the demographics of western cattle country are fairly diverse. A diversity that includes, to some people’s evident dissatisfaction, white folks.

We do need to respect the cultures and experiences of the wide array of people who made our nation. But respecting the legacy of one does not need to come at the expense of another, especially when what’s being dubbed cultural appropriation would more accurately be called cultural exchange.

The iconic images of cowgirls and cowboys on the range and in the rodeo arena are shining examples of what voluntary economic and cultural exchange can do. In this instance, raising an industry and an identity that became a vital element of the backbone of the nation.

Contact the author at bdeboer11@mail.wou.edu

A millennial takes on marriage

By: Kristin Eck
Copy Editor

There are some definite pitfalls that are related to getting married young. The most obnoxious being what people think they have a right to say to you leading up to and after your wedding. If I’m honest, I never thought I would marry young or even marry while I was still in college.

Furthermore, I never thought my wedding would end up being more for my family than for me and my husband.

That’s the realization I had about four months into wedding planning. I can honestly say that if we hadn’t already been knee deep in the process we would have eloped.

It was my husband who kept reminding me that weddings aren’t just for the bride and groom. It’s a time for the people you love, family and friends, to come together and celebrate something that transcends the superficiality of existence.

At least, this is the approach we took. We wanted to throw a party for the special people in our lives and I’d say we were very successful. Regardless, that doesn’t mean the process wasn’t thoroughly tedious and obnoxious.

Weddings are tied up in age-old social conventions, traditions and gender roles and other people are not afraid to share their opinions on these issues. It’s no surprise that older people tend to think they know what’s best in these kinds of situations, and while I respect that, I found much of the advice to be completely irrelevant.

I think the first instance was when my grandma told me that men don’t have a mind for things like wedding planning. She encouraged me not to bother him about colors, venues and flower choice.

Grandma, I thought to myself, would you not ask your best friend for help on one of the biggest days of your life? More importantly, a day that the both of you are sharing? Of course, times are much different than they were in her day. But let’s get this straight, my husband’s critical thinking ability doesn’t vanish when confronted with the “domestic trivialities of life.”

The second question that really took a few years off my life: are you two waiting to go on a honeymoon until later, I hear a lot of people your age do that? First of all, unless you’re willing to help pay for a honeymoon, it’s not really any of your business.

Secondly, this question is just downright rude, especially when it’s directed at two young people. It implies that you can’t afford a honeymoon because you’re either too young to have savings for that or you don’t have savings because you’re marrying too quickly.

This leads me into my third grievance: my age. Countless times I heard people tell me that I’m marrying too young. There’s no way I could possibly know what I want or who I am because my brain isn’t fully developed yet, right? Wrong. Certain experiences can shape a person from a very young age.

At some point during my childhood, I got a good look at the world and figured out what I wanted from it. More importantly, when I grew up I saw what I wanted and put a ring on it.

While my age is enough for some people to share their unwanted opinions, my education was another concern. Some people would ask me if I planned to take a year or two off school. This one made me laugh. When did your relationship status begin dictating your enrollment status?

School, college and classes are all just like having a full time job. Which, if I’m correct, is something normal, adult, married people do every day in lots of places. I planned my wedding while I was enrolled in school full-time. If I can plan my wedding and go to school, I think I can be married and stay in school.

This list could go on for a lifetime, and it probably will. But I’ve come to realize that most of these issues deal with negative misconceptions towards millennials. Millennials work hard, they pay their bills, they go on honeymoons and they pay off their student loans. They marry if they want to, who they want and when they want. Most importantly, millennials are redefining marriage for the first time in decades and I’m honored to be a part of the movement.

Contact the author at keck14@wou.edu

In defense of Lego

By: Ashton Newton
Entertainment Editor

When I was little, building Lego with my dad was one of my favorite things to do. We’d dump our giant buckets of Lego onto the living room floor and, in my little mind, enter a whole different world of magic and creativity.

As I look back, the beauty of those experiences with my dad wasn’t about how I felt, it’s how I remember the proud look he gave me when I built a building, or the excitement on his face when he showed me something he built.

I grew up building Lego, both alone and with my dad. Unlike some people, I never stopped. My Lego bucket still occasionally gets dumped out on the living room floor and I can’t remember a Christmas where there wasn’t at least one set on my list. Lego may be in the toy aisle, but it’s far from a toy.

First off, Lego promotes creativity in an adult world that looks down upon it. Some people like to write, some like to make music and some like to build. Creating things out of Lego that are incredible is a lot like drawing a really nice picture. It’s therapeutic to be creative, and creativity is what Lego is all about.

Having small models of things you love is another great reason to build Lego. As a “Star Wars” fan, having an X-Wing on my shelf is really cool. Lego partners with lots of movies like “Lord of the Rings,” “Harry Potter” and “The Avengers”. Whether or not you like building them, collecting Lego is almost as exciting.

Whether it’s with kids, siblings or friends, building Lego can also be a social experience. Some of my best memories with family or childhood friends are building Lego together and comparing what we built. Watching my little brother get older and start building his own sets has been an incredible experience as well.

Lego is expensive, but you don’t need a lot of money to get creative. With places like eBay and Craigslist, finding piles of cheap Lego is totally possible. Plus, the new video game “Lego Worlds” just came out. The game lets players build anything they want virtually with endless possibilities.

With sites like Reddit, Lego fans from all over the world can come together and share their creations. Whether an adult, a college student or a kid, Lego is an incredible hobby for anyone who likes to be creative.

Contact the author at anewton15@wou.edu

Let my people go

By: Zoe Strickland
Managing Editor

I want to preface this by saying that I identify as being culturally Jewish rather than religiously Jewish. I was raised in an interfaith household; my mom is Jewish and my dad isn’t religious, though his family somewhat is.

That being said, I’ve always been closer to my Jewish roots than my Christian ones. I know the beliefs, prayers, history, holidays. Growing up I didn’t go to Hebrew school, but I went to synagogue on Fridays and celebrated the high holy days. I have Jewish family members who moved here as a way of escaping Hitler’s regime. I’m proud of my heritage and I’m proud of what we’ve survived.

So when I see that there have been over 150 bomb threats to Jewish community centers and repeated instances of vandalism to Jewish cemeteries, I get angry. I get angry that this has been happening for months, and that the president waited until Feb. 28 to address it. I get angry that the religion I was raised with, one that promoted nothing but kindness and acceptance, is now being targeted because people are somehow still stuck in the 1930s. It’s sickening.

All of this has been done before: the threats, the vandalism.

During the Nazi regime they would set up days that were fully devoted to toppling down Jewish headstones. We’ve seen this before, we have a general idea of what it leads to, but there isn’t an active effort being made to combat the threats that are being made. Having one speech that denounces acts of hate is great, but it doesn’t prevent anything.

According to CNN, the bomb threats have been happening in waves “On Jan. 9, 15 Jewish centers and schools received bomb threats. Since then, the threats have occurred in waves, with a series of threats on Jan. 18, Jan. 31, Feb. 20,” reported an article from March 1. These threats are premeditated, they’re clearly being timed and put out in a specific way.

The police caught one of the people who was making the threats directed at New York community centers, and he was perpetrating the threats as a way of setting up his ex-girlfriend because he was mad at her. Bomb threats against any place, religion or organization aren’t justified. They aren’t a ploy to use to get back at someone you’re mad at. It’s a form of targeted, misplaced retaliation.

This past weekend was Purim, a Jewish holiday that’s meant to celebrate the resistance against an ancient Persian king’s plan to annihilate the Jews. During Purim, there was another wave of threats towards Jewish community centers. According to the PewResearchCenter, Jews make up 1.9 percent of the United States. The bomb threats not only target a specific group of people, but they also threaten the safety of a minority community in the United States. Regardless of the community, religious or not, we should all be concerned when any group within the country is threatened.

So far, in the United States and Canada, there has been a combined total of 154 threats to the Jewish community. We’re nearly three months into 2017 and 72 years past the end of WWII; why is this still going on?

Contact the author at zstrickland14@wou.edu

Look to the stars

By: Ashton Newton
Entertainment Editor

I don’t want to be cliche and begin this with a “Star Trek” quote, but it’s hard not to with NASA’s announcement of the discovery of TRAPPIST-1.

TRAPPIST-1 is a star 39 lightyears from Earth, and is about the
size of Jupiter. It was found when scientists noticed small, recurring blips in its light. These blips were the seven Earth-sized planets that orbit TRAPPIST-1, four of which are in the “sweet spot” in distance from the star to hold liquid water, and subsequently support life.

I’m beyond excited about this discovery. Not just about the potential for liquid water and life, but because TRAPPIST-1 seems like something out of science fiction. TRAPPIST-1 is an ultra-cool star; cool as in temperature, despite my obvious opinions. The planets are so close to each other that one could stand on the surface of one and see geographical landmarks on the next. The planets don’t rotate, so one side is stuck in an eternal day while the other is stuck in darkness. Small details like this about TRAPPIST-1 seem so exotic to us, but are actually more common than what we deal with on our own planet.

Getting to TRAPPIST-1 is completely impossible with our current technology. Even the closest star to ours, Proxima Centauri, is completely unreachable at four light-years away. We don’t have the technology to reach it, but that doesn’t mean it’s not an exciting discovery.

Focus being put onto studying TRAPPIST-1 has not only excited me, but many others have taken to the Internet to voice their excitement as well. Already, the discovery has sparked creativity. The star’s official website, www.trappist.one, is filled with poems, short stories and artwork inspired by the discovery.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson responded to the discovery by suggesting that the planets be named after the seven dwarves. Other people on Twitter have suggested naming the planets after the seven wonders of the world or even the seven dwarves featured in “The Hobbit.”

With a lot of stress in everyday life, looking to the stars and learning about breathtaking discoveries in our galaxy is a great way to take a break from the world and think about the future.

It’s exciting to think about the potential discoveries that could be made in the future as our technology gets more and more advanced. TRAPPIST-1 is not only an example of how cool our galaxy is, it’s an example of how cool our technology is getting.

Contact the author at anewton15@wou.edu

Get your head out of the clouds

By: Stephanie Blair
Editor-in-Chief

So, space is great and all, but no one is going to make it to the TRAPPIST-1 planets in our lifetime. Not only do we not have the technology, but the distance makes it physically impossible. Maybe it’s my deep-rooted pessimism or my penny-pinching upbringing, but I think that maintaining this planet is more important than trying to reach another planet, let alone another solar system.

I’m all for excitement and hope, but shouldn’t it be placed in something tangible? Get excited about humanity reaching Mars, okay. Dream about going to the moon on a SpaceX tourism trip, sure. But spending time being excited about the possibility of reaching TRAPPIST-1 is on par with panicking about the sun’s inevitable collapse that will result in the earth being engulfed in flames.

It’s just not a practical use of energy; it’s not happening in this lifetime.

So, what is a practical use of energy? Going super Al Gore on your friends.

Work to lower your personal carbon footprint: grow plants, recycle, go vegetarian. Heck, join the Green Team on campus!

There are so many ways to help slow, and eventually reverse, climate change, which would negate the necessity of moving humanity to another planet.

Well, at least until it comes time for the great sun collapse.

That’s not to say we shouldn’t work towards reaching other planets for the sake of science: I’m all for NASA checking out Mars. The keyword here is necessity; humanity shouldn’t be seeking ways to other planets because we have to, or worse, because people just didn’t want to clean up their own mess.

If a reversal remedy for cavities was found, making drilling and filling obsolete, wouldn’t you rather keep your original teeth? Think about the shift in attitude that would surround the dentist: no more dread and shame, just a nonchalant partnership to repair what’s been damaged. Why not work towards this with our planet? Especially when it’s so easy and there’s so much work to be done. Come on, y’all.

I’m glad that the TRAPPIST-1 discovery has provided some with a spot of excitement in these heavy, politically charged times, but it’s too little, too soon to reasonably hold as hope.

Contact the author at sblair13@wou.edu

How do you solve a problem like misrepresentation?

By: Stephanie Blair
Editor-in-Chief

Each year the Ralph J. Bunche Center publishes a “Hollywood Diversity Report” which examines the diversity of gender and race in all aspects of Hollywood, from writing to acting, directing to talent agencies. Despite minorities making up around 40 percent of America’s population, the film industry is underwhelmingly diverse. This is, in large part, due to the lack of diverse parts.

Viola Davis put it best in her 2015 Emmy speech: “You cannot win an Emmy for roles that are simply not there.”

Whitewashing in Hollywood isn’t a new problem, but the Asian community seems to receive the worst of it. There often aren’t Asian roles, and when there are, they are often still given to white people. While yellow-face seems outrageous to most now, it’s present in a classic film: the most racist acting I’ve ever seen comes from Mickey Rooney in “Breakfast at Tiffany’s.” What’s disappointing is that this is still happening over half a century after that disgusting performance, yellow-face may have disappeared but now, instead, race is simply being visually erased.

The stereotypes are not the sole focus of the characters anymore, but even when there is an Asian role, it’s often given to a white actor. Recent examples of this include Emma Stone, a freckle-covered red-head, being cast as a half-Asian character in “Aloha” and Scarlett Johansson being cast as Motoko Kusanagi in “Ghost in the Shell.”

And this goes beyond race; Deaf representation is severely lacking in Hollywood as well. In the 2016 film “Hush” Kate Siegel, a hearing actress, plays a deaf character. While her acting was convincing to a hearing audience, there are a plethora of deaf actresses who could have played the part just as easily. This film didn’t even have the excuse that they wanted a well-known actress to lead; Siegel, who co-wrote the film, decided to play the part herself rather than cast a deaf actress.

The danger of casting hearing people in Deaf roles is the misrepresentation. Last year, Ben Jarashow came to Western to give a talk titled “The Cycle of Ideology: The Image of Deaf People in Hollywood.” In the presentation, Jarashow shared some of the common misrepresentations of Deaf people in films and television from the start of film to the present because this is a very real problem still facing the Deaf community.

These decisions erase identity for people of color, the LGBTQ+ community, the Deaf community and countless other societal groups. They can also perpetuate wrong information and harmful stereotypes. The Bunche Center’s 2015 report stated that “films with relatively diverse casts enjoyed the highest median global box office receipts and the highest median return on investment.” There’s not even an economical reason not to include more diverse roles.

So, what can a lowly college student do to affect Hollywood? Boycott! This is a time honored tradition that works.

In June of 2016, a stage production of “Prince of Egypt” was in the works as a park concert that would potentially head for Broadway later on. However, in a play about Egyptians and middle-eastern Jews, the cast was entirely white. This sparked controversy and backlash online which ultimately led to the concert being cancelled.

Speaking out about representation can work, boycotting can work, but only if people take part. Don’t support films that whitewash and that don’t represent a character and help support minority communities.

Contact the author at sblair13@mail.wou.edu

Speak while everyone’s watching

By: Ashton Newton
Entertainment Editor

Celebrity activism has always been a big deal in the world of entertainment. Whether celebrities speak out by taking to social media or writing targeted speeches for award shows, the wide audiences that popular celebrities reach make for an opportunity for their voices to make a large impact. No matter the issue, or whether I’m for or against it, celebrities sparking up discussions is healthy for society and gets people thinking.

Celebrities speaking out about the election, both for and against President Trump, has been big in the news lately, but celebrity activism is far from a new thing. 

One of the most notable examples was during the 1973 Oscars, when Marlon Brando refused to attend the ceremony or accept his award for best actor in “The Godfather” to protest the treatment of Native Americans by the film industry and at Wounded Knee. Instead, an Apache trade member named Sacheen Littlefeather was sent to announce that he couldn’t accept the award.

Leonardo DiCaprio used his award platforms for “The Revenant” to discuss issues as well. During his speech for best actor at The Golden Globes, DiCaprio advocated for the Native Americans who live in the areas where the film was made.

“I want to share this award with all the First Nations peoples represented in this film and all the indigenous communities around the world. It is time we recognized your history and that we protect your indigenous lands from corporate interests,” said DiCaprio.

Award speeches are moments where fellow celebrities, the media and massive audiences of people all have eyes on someone, and I think bringing up a social cause that most people wouldn’t think of is a great thing to do while everyone is listening.

Afterwards, people take to social media voicing their opinions on what was said. While some individuals are mean and hurtful, a lot of people honestly voice their opinions on either side of the issue. The sharing of opinions, the small dinner table debates, it’s what creates a healthy, thoughtful and intelligent society.

Numerous celebrities took to the streets for the Jan. 21 Women’s March, using their voices to reach wide audiences with information and encouragement; Scarlett Johansson, Lady Gaga and Cher were all present at the Women’s March in Washington DC. Among the celebrities present, there was also actor and comedian Nick Offerman, who took to Twitter voicing his support and sharing photos of the march.

Whether it’s marching for causes, speaking out on Twitter or dedicating an award speech to a cause, celebrity activism provokes thinking and is positive for society.

Contact the author at anewton15@wou.edu

Individualism in a state of togetherness

By: Kristin Norman
Copy Editor

Being in a healthy relationship can help someone learn about themselves and what they need from another person. As a young, recently married person, I have a lot of growing to do despite my personal relationship. In what many call a process of self-actualization, I will spend the rest of my life working to love and know myself more.

While it is great having someone hold me accountable for my actions, challenging me to be a better person and encouraging me in my efforts, the bottom line is that only I can decide to change.

Nobody else can do the difficult task of self-improvement for me. I’ve witnessed far too many people my age seek out self-fulfillment in others while forgetting that they are not who they date.

That being said, I don’t agree with the idea that people should only try dating as a means to understanding who they are and what they want. This way of thinking implies that singledom is something to be overcome instead of embraced.

It may sound overly cliché coming from a married person, but there are times when I miss the independence that comes with being single. Singleness provides the opportunity to explore avenues of life without the influence of another person. However, I also believe it’s possible to be with someone who doesn’t hinder your ability to explore those avenues.

With Valentine’s Day just around the corner, remember that being in college is a masterful balancing act that involves the process of self-actualization. If you’re single: be empowered and take the opportunity to know and love yourself. If you’re in a committed relationship: find time to better yourself with the help of someone you love.

Please contact the author at keck14@wou.edu.com

Loving thyself

By: Keith Mathew
Photo Editor

When do we think of ourselves as good people? Do we even think that at all? As a society that thrives on self-deprecating jokes, we start to believe the jokes we create for ourselves on a subconscious level. I see a large majority of people I know who don’t think they’re good people, or at least to the level of everyone else around them.

I am one of those people who doesn’t think highly of themselves. It has taken me a long time to get to the point of starting to improve myself. It takes an immense amount of effort to start the process and to continue it. The most common thing people say is “fake it until you make it.” It’s kind of true; having fake confidence in one’s self is a trial run of the ultimate goal. Fake confidence is the start of getting comfortable with the idea and feeling or acting confident.

I feel the reason most people have low self-esteem or a lack of confidence comes from the tendency to compare ourselves to other people: I’m not as smart as them, I’m not as cool as them, I’m not as masculine as them, I’m not as fit as them. These comparisons are harmful. They put us down because we aren’t at the level of another person. We think that because we aren’t at the same level we are lesser than, thus creating a negative self-image.

There is a common thought process for people with low self-image that they should be working on themselves before they start to date another person. It annoys me because it takes a lot to work on yourself and another person may actually help. Another person may open the mind to improving and the love of another person can help heal, repair, fix and improve.

The love of another person pushes the other to try and to become better. I bet no one was 100 percent confident in themselves when another person came along. That line of thinking just doesn’t help, having another person is not bad, it is good for loving one’s self.

With my experiences of low self-image, friends and family try to make me feel better by complimenting me however, because of the compliments I feel bad for not feeling better about myself. The problem is not whether I know I’m good or not, it’s the feeling. I know that I’m smart, I know I’m nice, I know that I’m amazing but the feeling is not there to back it up.

It is my goal this term to improve myself and to have real confidence, not just the fake kind. The best way to improve is to have a mantra, a saying to tell yourself how great and amazing you are. Sounds cheesy but it does help. Self-love is a process and it’s hard work.

Contact the author at kmathew14@wou.edu

The women’s march doesn’t stop here

By: Zoe Strickland
Managing Editor

The past 19 days have been full of marches and protests. From the National Women’s Marches across the country to the Science March that’s being planned planned for Earth Day, people are trying to make sure that their voices are heard.

The National Women’s March was one of the largest marches in history; people of all genders and nationalities came together to express their opposition to the inauguration. Among those protesters was a large volume of white, able-bodied, cisgendered women. Hell, the hats that were being knitted for the Women’s March were essentially a representation of cisgendered genitalia.

I get that people tend to feel attacked when you bring this up, but this is something that should be brought up. My problem with white cis-women showing up in droves to march comes when you compare the crowds at the Women’s March to the crowds at nearly every other protest or march around the country – crowds that get less attention because this section of the population isn’t there. The public are more likely to reflect positively about an event if white women are there; it makes no sense, but that’s institutionalized prejudice for you.

The amount of people marching across the country was massive; it was great. But where are those crowds of people during Black Lives Matter protests? Where are they during the uprise against the Dakota access pipeline? What are they doing to help the Flint water crises?

If you marched or wanted to march at the National Women’s March, remember to keep your views intersectional. Remember that there are people who may not have an identity similar to yours that still need to be supported. Transgender and gender-nonconforming people need to be supported. People with disabilities need to be supported. People of different races need to be supported. Just because a protest or march may not apply to you, doesn’t mean you can dismiss it and just not pay attention.

When you look at how many people protested in Portland after the election and then look at which of those people actually voted in the election, there’s a massive disconnect. The Oregonian reported that of the 112 people arrested at the protest, only 28 percent of them actually voted and that 32 percent voted but didn’t turn in their ballot.

Even though the Women’s March exists as a result of the anticipated anti-women policies of the current administration, CNN reported that 52 percent of white women voted for Donald Trump. This half-hearted attempt at showing discontent won’t get things done.

The people who are against the Trump administration and their policies have four more years- activist efforts shouldn’t be confined to just the months surrounding the election and inauguration.

All of these marches and protests mean nothing if you pick and choose which causes to support. Just because you obtain rights that you’re comfortable with, doesn’t mean the job is done; it just means that you are currently more privileged.

Protests and activism are a vital part of our rights as citizens – why not take advantage of that right? In our current digital age, you don’t have an excuse for not being an active member of society. If you can’t make it to a protest, you can still talk about it. You can still stay educated, you can still educate other people.

Contact the author at zstrickland14@wou.edu

A new time to help Tibet

By: Burke De Boer
Sports Editor

With last week’s inauguration of a new president came an immediate question on everyone’s mind: what about Tibet?

Well, maybe not so much. President Donald Trump came to power basing his campaign on economic issues. When he did address foreign policy it usually came from an economic bent: notably his promise to renegotiate Chinese trade deals.

Unfortunately, it’s been some time since Tibet’s occupation has been a heavily discussed issue in America. But the international community has been reacting to a fresh and recent attack on Tibetan culture from the Chinese government.

Larung Gar is the largest Tibetan Buddhist academy in the world and last summer China set upon it, demolishing buildings and physically removing nuns and monks that live there. 4,500 people have already been removed as the Chinese government approaches its population target of 5,000. This time last year, over 10,000 people resided in Larung Gar.

I am reminded of last year’s calamity at Standing Rock, which saw an outpouring of support from our community. Enough to move the planned pipeline.

However America has been unable to pressure China to relax on Tibet. This has been the case ever since China soured on Soviet relations.

America has had a strange relationship with Beijing ever since former President Jimmy Carter abandoned Taiwan to exclusively recognize the People’s Republic as the Chinese government.

Trump took on the Obama Administration’s handling of China throughout his campaign. His promises of aggressive trade and renegotiations with China did excite some Tibetans. Prime Minister-in-exile, Lobsang Sangay, expressed optimism in an interview with Reuters, calling Trump’s view of China a “realistic” one.

When, as president-elect, Trump accepted a phone call from Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen, it became the first time that the two nations’ leaders had spoken since 1979. Some were worried that this would anger Beijing. What they fail to see is how abandoning a one-China policy would give the American government better leverage to pressure the People’s Republic on Tibetan oppression.

But if Trump is realistic on China, we should also be realistic on Trump. He could potentially be the best ever president for Tibet, but this is the man who wrote “The Art of the Deal.”

It’s impossible to rule out the idea of Tibet and Taiwan being used as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations. In fact it seems more likely from a president who campaigned based on economic issues more so than foreign policy.

Which is why activist organization in the Tibetan cause is so important. We saw the power of activism to stop government powers at Standing Rock. But international activism is severely and consistently undermined by trade relations.

If the new president follows through in establishing a tough stance on China it will only strengthen the movement for Tibet.

There is reason to be optimistic, and reason to think the actions at Larung Gar can be stopped. It’s not that Trump will be a pro-Tibet president; a firmer stance on the People’s Republic from the United States will only provide solid footing for pressure from outside of the new administration.

Organized activist movements like Students For a Free Tibet and the NGO Free Tibet lead the way for international pressure on China and they will continue to do so. In the coming years I see their position only becoming stronger.

Contact the author at bdeboer11@mail.wou.edu

In defense of the genre: musicals

By: Jade Rayner
News Editor

As an Arts major with an emphasis in theatre, I’ve learned to break apart scripts and movies and, at times, over-analyze and search for meaning in shows that I watch. A common idea among those around me is that a story must be complex or have a deeper meaning to be interesting. While that’s a valid thought, it discredits shows that focus on spectacle over plot; particularly a large portion of musicals that invoke just as much, if not more, feeling in a wider range of audiences.

“La La Land” is easily described on the Internet Movie Database as, “A jazz pianist falls for an aspiring actress in Los Angeles.” The musical starring Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone won a record-breaking seven Golden Globes awards, along with many others since its Dec. 9, 2016 release. Upon finishing the movie, I was disappointed due to the lack of a complex plot. The story is one that has appeared time and time again, especially in musicals: a woman aspires to become famous, falls in love and in the end everything works out. The simplicity is one that can easily infuriate those who go to the cinema to be served with a challenging plot filled with risky ideas. I see it otherwise.
Now, take a moment to think about how a simple plot could result in something much more impactful than one might have originally considered, specifically in the musical genre. A complex plot needs time and focus on the story in order to achieve its goal. Without the words, an audience can get easily lost, and in my case, will result in losing interest.

Musicals are an important bridge that brings enthusiasts of theatre, regular movies and TV together. Why? Because of the spectacle that the musical genre is known for. Simplicity in plot gives room for the characters to sing and dance as a way of expressing emotion, which can be consistently more attention-grabbing than spoken dialogue in a roughly two hour movie.

Along the same lines as “La La Land,” “The Last Five Years” is a fairly simple story about the relationship of Jamie, an upcoming novelist, and struggling actress Cathy from beginning to their not-so-happy ending. Although the story of the musical can be described in a single sentence, the style it’s portrayed in is anything but bland. For Cathy, the story goes in reverse chronological order, and Jamie’s side moves in chronological order. The style in which the story is told adds complexity, which works well because of the simple plot.

Next time you leave the theater disappointed because the plot didn’t open up a realm of new ideas, or make a ground-breaking statement, take a moment to reflect on how the cinematography or music affected your emotions. Power can come from more than words.

Contact the author at jrayner14@wou.edu

Remember that money talks

By: Zoe Strickland
Managing Editor

Why is it, that when someone famous is accused of a crime, it rarely ever affects them?

Last year, Johnny Depp was accused of domestic abuse by his then-wife Amber Heard. Despite clear evidence that Heard had been injured, people still took Depp’s side. Even now, after their

NEW YORK, NY – JUNE 25: Actor Johnny Depp enters the “Late Show With David Letterman” taping at the Ed Sullivan Theater on June 25, 2013 in New York City. (Photo by Ray Tamarra/FilmMagic)

divorce has been settled some, including Depp’s lawyers, claim that Heard was only trying to prolong her time in the spotlight, even though she’s an actress with multiple forthcoming movies.

Abusing Heard barely put a dent in Depp’s career. According to the Internet Movie Database, he is slated to have ten roles within the next two years.

Depp is nowhere near the only celebrity whose abusive tendencies have been overlooked in favor of their career. Bill Murray, Gary Oldman, Michael Fassbender, John Lennon and Chris Brown are only some of the people who make the list.

As a society, we need to start asking ourselves why we justify spending our money supporting people who commit crimes, why we assist in breeding a culture that inherently sides with the accused.

Though the accusations against Depp had nothing to do with his career, the money and power he obtained as a result of his celebrity status most likely played a role in how the domestic abuse accusations were perceived.

People in my life have made the argument that a celebrity’s personal life shouldn’t play a role in how their professional work is viewed. I disagree.

We exist in a money-driven, power-hungry society. Consuming the work of someone who has been accused of something like domestic violence is still a form of promotion; your views and ‘likes’ and ‘shares’ are still building revenue. You’re putting money in the hands of the people who do things you don’t agree with, and money talks.

After all, when Tiger Woods cheated on his wife he lost multiple sponsorship deals. If something like infidelity can have a negative impact on someone’s career, why does abuse not result in a similar outcome?

If Disney sees that people are going to theatres to see the next “Pirates” movie, they are more likely to use its lead, Johnny Depp, in their movies.

According to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, one in three women and one in four men will be victims of domestic violence in their lifetime. Rather than spending your money on a movie or CD by a celebrity who has committed an act of violence, consider putting that money towards helping victims of domestic violence.

You can donate to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence by going to ncadv.org.

Contact the author at zstrickland14@wou.edu.

Editor’s Note

By: Stephanie Blair
Editor-in-Chief

In light of the recent loss in our community, I felt that it was only appropriate to have our first issue of 2017 serve as a memorial for all those that were lost, both locally and globally, in 2016.

I, myself, lost my oldest brother in October and can’t begin to explain the impact that has screen-shot-2016-09-28-at-6-56-59-pmalready had on my life, let alone what will continue to happen for the rest of my life. The loss of any person is a cause for grief, but there’s a special suffering that comes when it’s someone young: someone like Alma, someone like my brother.

Grief encompasses more than death, however, because it’s a feeling of loss. Many of our students have experienced loss in the last year; loss of a loved one, loss of an idol, loss of feeling safe in our country. It’s in these seasons of intense loss that community is more important than ever.

Isolation is toxic. It feels sometimes like no one understands what’s happening in our lives but, even if that’s true, it doesn’t mean that no one can support you, can listen to you, can keep you company.

If there’s one thing I’ve found in my own struggle these past few months, it’s that community is everything. When my hometown got the news about my family’s loss, food was delivered daily to my parents, heartfelt apologies were extended; people rallied around us. I see such strong communities at Western and know that they have the same capability.

I would encourage anyone struggling this winter to join a club, pick up a part time job, start counseling, get involved at a church/temple/mosque. Do something that surrounds you with support, with friends.

Heck, if you want to come work for me, I’ll pay you and feed you pizza.

Please ask for help, even if you don’t think you need it. 2017 can be a beautiful year, but only if you’re around to see it.

Free counseling is available for all Western students at the Student Health and Counseling Center on campus; all services are confidential, and all counselors are state licensed professionals, counseling trainees, and/or graduate-level counseling interns.

A list of clubs on Western’s campus can be found on OrgSync, which can be accessed through Portal. WolfLink has all of the current job listings posted through Western’s Service Learning and Career Development Center.

Contact the author at journaleditor@mail.wou.edu