Mount Hood

Share the love

By: Megan Clark 
Campus Life Editor

Polyamory, a romantic relationship involving more than two people, gets a bad rap in most monogamous societies.

Due to a social climate that favors partnerships between only two people, individuals who want to practice polyamory are often stigmatized and shamed.

Like most things that branch away from the norm, polyamory is misunderstood and criticized.

Polyamory is not polygamy, an important distinction to make, as polygamy often conjures up images of fundamentalist compounds on the Canadian border thronging with sister-wives.

Polyamory simply means “many loves,” and involves entering into a relationship with more than one person. People remark on the morality, or lack thereof, of those involved in a polyamorous relationships, saying that it shows lack of commitment and desire for fidelity, which, of course, is untrue.

Possibly due to these misconceptions, polyamory is not overly common, though polyamorous relationships are increasing in popularity.

Some studies, like one done by Dr. Elisabeth Sheff, an educational consultant and the foremost academic expert on polyamory in the United States according to Psychology Today, have shown that polyamorous relationships have few negative impacts on children raised in polyamorous households.

The only harms possibly lie in growing too attached to a partner that might later leave, an issue present even in monogamous relationships, and having to face the societal stigma surrounding such an arrangement.

In addition to the normal issues encountered with monogamous relationships, polyamorous relationships feature many of the same ideals, such as consent, dedication, and, of course, love.

Since polyamory is not based on the perceived ownership of another, it alleviates feelings of jealousy; it is understood that love is shared between multiple people.

Polyamorous relationships allow for varied and greater emotional support.

There are benefits to having multi-partnered relationships that can’t be realized due to the negative attention polyamory receives.

This lifestyle is ultimately beneficial to those involved and harmless to everyone else, yet it is shamed and degraded because it doesn’t follow a certain set of values and norms.

Polyamorous relationships aren’t for everyone, but stigmas against polyamory ultimately restrict how others conduct their personal and romantic lives.

However, according to Tracy Giuliano, a psychologist at Southwestern University in Texas, “the more aware people were of polyamory, the more positive their attitudes were.”

With increased familiarity and awareness comes understanding and the acceptance of healthy lifestyle choices, such as polyamory, that go against the grain.

Musings from a woman on the edge

By: Katrina Penaflor 
Managing Editor

Shia, Shia, Shia. You and your fake-sounding-but-definitely-real last name have done something I so desperately wish I could have been a part of.

For those who aren’t aware, the actor Shia LaBeouf staged a three day long screening of all of his films in reverse chronological order at the Angelika Film Center in New York.

The performance-art project was titled “All My Movies” and gave fans of the actor an opportunity to sit in the theater and watch LaBeouf watch his own films.

Or, I guess audience members could watch the films too, but if it was me in the audience, I would definitely be looking at LaBeouf’s own candid reactions.

There also was a livestream focused entirely on the actor’s face for anyone who couldn’t make it to get a look.

The viewing spanned over three days and started with LaBeouf’s most recent film “Man Down” and ended with his first work “Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind.”

So what was the point in all this?

Is Shia LaBeouf secretly working on some genius scheme to win over all the fans he lost (don’t worry I stuck around) when he went off his rocker and wore a bag over his head that read “I am not famous anymore?”

Or is this an apology for all his outrageous outbursts and decisions? Just to clear the air, yes, I do include him acting in the Indiana Jones reboot in that category that requires apology.

Or is this really some deep, meaningful piece of performance-art that says so much more than we all think it does?

Well, how am I supposed to know? The exact point of this is yet to be made clear, but after the movies finished the actor did say, “I walked out loving myself.”

So perhaps he was just trying to connect again with society, and his fans, and his work.

But one thing I can say for certain is the actor/performance-artist just sat for three days straight and watched all his movies with a bunch of random people filtering in and out of the theatre, and that’s pretty freakin’ awesome.

My one complaint: where was the Disney Channel original movie “Tru Confessions” in this mix? Shia, why did you leave one of my favorite ones out?

To watch the recorded livestream of the actor visit newhive.com/allmymovies.

What’s good?

By: Stephanie Blair 
Photo Editor

Following the attack on Paris, social media seems to be peppered with reminders that there were other attacks around the world on Friday, Nov. 13, 2015.

However, I would like to focus on more immediate safety: safety of our Muslim students on campus.

After the attack of 9/11, hate crimes against Muslims in the U.S. skyrocketed.

In fact, they became five times more common, according to the Washington Post. Even without being violent, non-Muslim Americans, when surveyed, held substantial prejudice against Muslims, regardless of American citizenship.

“These surveys suggest that many Americans do not distinguish between the vast majority of peaceful Muslims and the very small number of Muslims who commit violent acts,” John Sides of the Washington Post wrote.

It is easy to hate a larger, all-encompassing community group for the actions of a much smaller sub-set.

However, just as the majority of Christians do not agree with the actions of the Westboro Baptist Church, the majority of Muslims do not agree with the actions of ISIS/ISIL.
According to the Pew Research Center, as of 2015 there are approximately 1.6 billion Muslims in the world.

However, even if you do consider members of ISIS Muslims, that would still mean that 0.000125% of Muslims serve ISIS, based upon the estimated number of ISIS soldiers in an interview with UK newspaper The Independent with by Fuad Hussein, the chief of staff of the Kurdish President Massoud Barzani.

It is important to note that many, including President Barack Obama, do not consider ISIS members to be Muslims.

“We are not at war with Islam,” Obama said at the White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism in February of 2015. “We are at war with people who have perverted Islam.”
America was partly founded on the concept of freedom of religion, the opportunity for religious practice without persecution.

So, with all of the talk of particular governors demanding that we allow exact gun freedom while announcing they will only accept “proven Christian” refugees from Syria, let’s at least demand all of said constitution is honored.

As of Nov. 19, 31 state governors have announced that they oppose letting Syrian refugees into their states. However, states cannot legally refuse to allow refugees in, since the federal government announced in September that the U.S. would be accepting 10,000 of the estimated 70,000 refugees, according to an article from the Washington Post.

Please look out for our Muslim classmates on campus, as these actions weren’t perpetrated in their name.

Why leave the house when you could shop online?

By: Brianna Bonham 
Staff Writer

Black Friday is the chaotic, day-after-Thanksgiving sale that many big name retailers put on. It is thought of as the kick-off to the holiday shopping season, and the day that people everywhere go crazy for BOGO socks at Fred Meyer.

Crowds of people gather at the doors of the big name retailers ready to pounce on any deal they can get their hands on, ready to stop at nothing.

People get trampled, finding parking is almost impossible, and mall security gets serious, but that’s all totally worth it for the towels that are half off at Bed Bath and Beyond, right?

Although some like to experience the violence and the rush of Black Friday shopping, others may prefer to stay in the safety of their homes, or give their money to small businesses in their local area.

Small Business Saturday is the day after Black Friday, and is a great opportunity to support local businesses.

Small Business Saturday is a national event coined and supported by American Express, which encourages shoppers to go out and explore their neighborhood, supporting their community and local entrepreneurs.

Small Business Saturday is a chance for people to support their local businesses that may not have made as much of a profit because of Black Friday being an event mostly done at large retailers.

The day also increases promotion of small businesses to those that may not otherwise shop locally at small businesses.

Cyber Monday is another alternative that is perfect for people who do not want to leave the safety of their own home and face the crowds. Simply open up your laptop, browse through thousands of stellar sales online, and have the products shipped directly to your door.

Amazon offers a huge variety of Cyber Monday deals every year, as well as websites such as Target, Modcloth, and Nordstrom. This is a convenient and fast way to shop as opposed to pushing through people and fighting traffic on Black Friday.

These alternatives are great options for those that love to shop, but want to avoid the messy, busy, Black Friday. Sit back and relax in the comfort of your home while browsing online, or drive through the neighborhood and shop at your local businesses.

Keep it Black FRIDAY

By: Katrina Penaflor 
Managing Editor

I’ll start by saying I have nothing against Black Friday shopping.

I don’t see anything wrong with people crowding into busy stores to find a good deal on electronics, or clothes, or whatever they’re looking for.

Black Friday shopping is great, as long as it stays black Friday, with the emphasis on Friday, as in the day that comes after Thursday.

My problem comes in with how, over recent years, the shopping day has crept its way up to Thursday.

This trend of black Friday shopping starting early has become extremely popular in the retail market, and although there are plenty of stores who are against Thanksgiving as a shopping day, like Nordstrom, H&M, and Costco, there are plenty of places that still support it.

I see Thanksgiving as a day to be grateful, a time to spend with friends and family enjoying a short reprieve from our hectic day-to-day lives, all while enjoying some delicious food.

I don’t see it as a day to leave your regular festivities and shop endlessly for discounted clothes, or, to take the viewpoint of many store’s employees, have to come in to work.

Last year I found myself in that situation.

While holding a retail job, I was scheduled to come in at 4 p.m. on Thanksgiving Day to help deal with the hordes of enthusiastic shoppers. I had to leave my Thanksgiving dinner with family to go to work at a place that I felt had no real need to be open on a holiday.

Yes, there are plenty of places that need to keep their doors open on Thanksgiving, I completely understand that, but I don’t see retail stores as any of those.

The shopping, in my opinion, can wait.

I always thought that was part of the fun anyway. At least for me it was. I would enjoy Thanksgiving dinner then wake up early the following day and go to stores that normally wouldn’t be open at 5 a.m.

I wish more stores like Costco would take into consideration how staying open on a holiday can affect their employees.

Sure there are plenty of people who chose to leave the house to shop that day, but think about the employees who get an eight hour shift from 4 p.m. to midnight.

If less people were enthusiastic about shopping Thanksgiving day, the majority of the stores would have smaller sales — which could potentially lead to them keeping their doors closed on a holiday in the future.

Black Friday shopping isn’t the problem here. It is black Thursday shopping that I believe has become the bigger issue.

Black Friday

By: Conner Williams 
Editor-in-Chief

Oregon law does not require that overtime pay be provided for individuals that work on Thanksgiving Day, according to the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries.

The discretion is left up to the business of whether or not to provide overtime pay for employees on national holidays.

And since many businesses begin their Black Friday promotional sales early on Thursday, this means that employees are working on Thanksgiving instead of being home with their families.
The bottom line is that if employees are going to be forced to work on a national holiday, they should be compensated additionally.

In Oregon, the rate of overtime pay is one and a half times the base rate of pay, but let’s take it one step further and say that employees working on national holidays should be paid twice their rate of pay.

Now, you may be wondering, “But if people could make twice as much money, wouldn’t they rather go to work instead?”

Not necessarily.

First, let’s assume a scenario in which an individual has a choice to work on a holiday or not. It then becomes a matter of personal preferences.

Economic theory says that people whom make higher wages already are more likely to stay home rather than work for increased wages, since they already make a lot of money in the first place.

That temporary increase in wages from the holiday pay will not affect their overall income as much as it would a person with a lower income.

In contrast, a person with a lower income is more likely to want to go to work if they will receive a higher rate of pay, because it actually got more expensive for them to stay home.

Think of it this way: an individual makes $10 an hour, and they can then make $20 an hour if they work on a holiday. That means that every hour they don’t work loses them $20 instead of $10, so they will be more likely to want to go to work since they already have a low rate of pay.

Dr. John Leadley, an economics professor at WOU, reiterated this notion.

“Sure, somebody might say ‘I’ll work on Thanksgiving and make more money, then [my family and I] will celebrate it another day,’ but it still comes down to preferences,” Leadley said.

But again, this is assuming that someone has the choice of working or not. Many people are forced to work on holidays for their base rate of pay or else they will lose their jobs.

This needs to change.

Politics in the classroom

This editorial is not in response to the teaching practices of any professor at WOU. Since we are nearing a Presidential election, The Journal’s Editorial Team felt it was necessary to address the topic of politics and opinions in the classroom

It is inevitable that one’s own personal beliefs about a subject will come into play during a conversation, even if it happens subconsciously.

We are affected and influenced by our own biases whether we like it or not. The challenge then becomes how we control them in an academic setting, where a neutral stance is best for optimum learning.

In the ideal classroom, students should be exposed to the facts, and then exposed to the techniques to be able to decide for themselves what sort of personal conclusions they wish to draw from them, rather than have a professor tell them what they should or should not believe without explanation of the procedure by which that conclusion was reached.

Now, take into account a professor’s’ opinions in the classroom. Although not facts, it’s important to know that when an opinion is presented, it should always be taken as such. Opinions are merely a piece of information that can be used to expand on a student’s understanding of a subject, but not as something to sway them in a particular direction of correct or incorrect.

The line where opinions and politics blend together in the classroom is tricky. Teachers should be welcome to give students the unbiased facts on candidates, policies, et cetera that lead to a health conversation between students and professors. But it’s important to avoid creating situations where a professor tries to purposely lead students to side with their own political stance.

When a person in power, like a college professor, takes their power and encourages students to believe a certain political opinion, it takes away the student’s right to decide for him or herself.

A classroom is a place to learn, not to be preached at. It’s important for the people facilitating our learning to consider all the different opinions on a subject fairly.

This is why it is so important that the classroom remains a safe setting for opinions, conversation, and debate. In order for students to gain the maximum amount of information from multiple sources and points of view, they must be exposed to different elements. If a professor wishes to share something from a liberal-oriented news source, it would behoove them to also examine a conservative-oriented source.

Students and professors should be welcomed to express opinions, as long as they are willing to hear and understand the opposite point of view. Keeping a classroom safe and neutral is important. Allowing students to be in a place where varied beliefs are welcomed, without the authoritative voice of “you should believe this,” or “you should believe that.”

Most liberally-oriented people aren’t going to watch The O’Reilly Factor for their political commentary, just as most conservatively-oriented individuals probably aren’t going to tune into The Daily Show for theirs. People tend to seek out information that is going to reinforce what they already believe; they don’t want to hear opinions that conflict with their own. So, it is important to examine multiple viewpoints with different underlying ideologies. It may also be beneficial to view news from neutral sources that are not owned by a politically-affiliated parent corporation, such as Reuters, BBC, or The Real News.

A.L.I.C.E. training throws it all out the window

8XYMJF

By: Conner Williams 
Editor-in-Chief

I like to think that if I were in a situation in which a person wanted to do me bodily harm, my animal brain would take over and I would fight back or run.

In the face of danger, our innate instincts tell us to stand and fight or flee.

We can never really know what type of reaction we will have until that situation happens, and of course I hope that neither I, nor any of you ever have to find out exactly what you would do.

However, A.L.I.C.E. (Alert, Lockdown, Inform, Counter, Evacuate) training teaches people to do just that: trust their instincts in emergency situations.

We have been taught for years that in an active shooter situation, we are supposed to lockdown and hide.

This method has shown to be extremely ineffective over the years, as we have seen that in the large majority of school shootings, those that hide are the ones that get killed.

Part of the A.L.I.C.E. training I attended on Wednesday, Nov. 11 had the audience listen to a 911 call from the Columbine High School shooting.

A teacher at Columbine, Patti Nielson, had hid in the library with some students and had told her students to stay down and hide under the desks. She called 911 and did everything she possibly could to follow her training.

But that was just the problem: her formal training directly contributed to the loss of lives.

During the call, Nielson could be heard telling students to get back under the desks, meaning that they were trying to get up to run and she directed them to stay down.

That is a problem. Those kids’ survival instincts told them to get out of there, but they were told to stay by a person of authority.
But, does the fault really lie on Nielson? Of course not.

She was simply doing exactly what she was trained to do, and she conducted herself perfectly under extremely stressful circumstances.

The really terrible thing is that there were doors all along the back wall of the library that they could have fled out of, but their training told them to stay put and wait for the police.

We need to break away from the traditional lockdown and hide protocol and learn to trust our instincts.

Running away is the best option. Human beings were built to run quickly in long distances; trust yourself and get out as fast as possible in the face of danger.

I generally don’t endorse violence, but in a life-or-death situation with an active shooting/killer, you must do absolutely anything to survive.

Officer Trevor Jackson of Campus Public Safety presented the training session, telling us to use any and everything at our disposal to distract and otherwise disorient the shooter/killer.

Throw your phone at them at then run the other direction. Any sort of disorientation will throw off the shooter’s plan and buy you precious seconds to get away, even mere seconds are crucial.

I sincerely hope that none of us has to find out how finely tuned our survival instincts truly area, but we need to be prepared for the worst.

Always trust your instincts, and do everything you can to get away from the situation.
I highly recommend that you participate in an A.L.I.C.E. training on campus. Upcoming dates can be found on the CPS webpage.

Musings from a woman on the edge

KatrinaColor

By: Katrina Penaflor 
Managing Editor

Drop your pitchforks made out of red Starbucks cups and find a real problem to complain about.

The controversy over Starbucks’ holiday cups is seriously getting out of control.

The argument spurring all this is that the cups, being an ombre of red, are not “holiday enough” and are somehow a war against Christianity in their minimalist approach of decorations and lack of “Merry Christmas.”

Please, overly-opinionated coffee drinkers of the world and self-proclaimed argument starters, stop centering a holiday around a cup that holds coffee.

This controversy is about something that is literally getting tossed into the trash when it’s done being used.
This is why I’m just not understanding all the hate.

So there are no snowflakes printed on it, or there isn’t a “Merry Christmas” sprawled across the cup in beautiful cursive script. I guess that means Christmas is ruined forever.

There’s no hope for any holiday spirit because my cup of coffee was served in a plain red cup.

Will the next debate be against a coffee shop that doesn’t have holiday cups at all? Quick, everyone go boycott a café who uses the same cups all year and clearly lacks holiday spirt.

I don’t care if my coffee cup has holiday pictures printed on it, or if the colors don’t fit the traditional holiday mold of what Christmas cheer should look like.

A coffee cup does not define a religion. A coffee cup does not define holiday spirit.

I don’t believe for one second that Starbucks created these cups as some war on Christianity or to eliminate holiday cheer.

People need to settle down and stop trying to create a problem out of something that’s a non-issue.

So if anyone wants to complain about getting handed a red holiday cup from Starbucks, please take at least five minutes to reassess your life, and be grateful that you can even afford the luxury of having a cup of coffee.

Never say die

By: Katrina Penaflor 
Managing Editor

What to do when you have thousands of movie fans swarming your property begging to see inside your house and get a tour? Block off all the windows with blue tarp.

Or at least that’s what the owner of the legendary Goonies’ house has done.

The house sits in Astoria, Ore., the filming location of the 1985 cult classic “The Goonies.”

The movie is a personal childhood favorite of mine. I recall watching the movie as a kid while chanting the famous phrase “Goonies never say die.”

But unfortunately, the home from the film, and its access for tours and visitors, has taken its last breath.

Over the summer, the owner of the home officially closed the doors for good. Blocking up windows with blue tarps and denying all access to the property.

The sudden closure came from an influx of visitors, nearly a thousand every day, knocking on doors, entering the property, and trying to get a taste of their childhood nostalgia.

It was also the result of the lack of respect show by visitors to the house, many of whom left beer cans and other trash all over the place.

I can understand the owner’s frustrations.

To deal with endless crowds of people every day would feel invasive and exhausting. How could a person wanting to live their normal, day-to-day life keep up?

I also can see the argument behind people who want to view the house and say things like, “the owner chooses to live in the Goonies house, she should welcome visitors!”

However, for the most part she has for years. It’s not that the owner isn’t welcoming, it’s a simple question of how much one person can handle when it comes to crowds of people wanting into their home.

If it were me, I would want to support visitors, but there would have to be consideration for my own privacy and a way to monitor the visitor’s safety, as well as my own.

I think if people want hope for the visitation rights to potentially return in the future, the owner of the house needs to receive support from the city, as well as more respect for her privacy, and acknowledgement that it is a functioning house in addition to being a landmark.

So far, the extent of what the city has done is put up signs indicating private property, and notifications that the Goonies house is closed. There has also been discussion of making the road to the owner’s house, which at the moment is public property, private.

Sure, people can question why this should become the city’s issue, but think about how much of an attraction the Goonies house is. This can be beneficial to Astoria. Thousands of people travel to the Oregon coastal town just to get a look at where the movie was made.

If the city helps to keep visitors away by eliminating all signs that lead to the Goonies house, because there are still quite a few official signs scattered across the town, and they help mark her road as private, maybe this will ease the frustration of the owner.

This could potentially lead to the return of more monitored visits in the future, potentially.

There’s really no way to tell what the future holds, but for now, I think the privacy of the owner needs to be respected.

She welcomed visits in the past, and we can only hope that the option will return in the future.

Never say die.