Mount Hood

Accepting the flow of new gym-goers

Paul F. Davis

Caity Healy | Lifestyle Editor

With the start of the new year, you can count on a few things. A new sense of hope amongst many, a thousand “new year, new me” posts on Instagram and a completely packed gym, full of excited and ready fresh faces. Each treadmill, stairmaster, squat rack and bench will be occupied, and everywhere you turn will be a new person.

For those who go to the gym daily or at least frequently, I can understand where the frustration is arising from. You’re used to your routines and you can count on the fact that when you get to the gym, the equipment you’re wanting will be available. With a new herd of people joining in, your routine is getting shaken up a bit. However, I want you to remember one thing: it’s not your gym.

Every single person who goes to Western pays to be able to take part in all that the Health and Wellness Center has to offer. They have just as much right as anyone else to be there and utilize it however they see fit. People who chose to start 2018 by going to the gym are likely making a conscious effort to try and improve their health and fitness. Who are you to say that it is not okay?

It’s also frustrating when frequent gym-goers say things along the lines of “well they won’t be here long,” or laugh at the fact that many people choose to stop going after a few weeks into the new year. That is the absolute opposite attitude you should be having towards them. You should be rooting on these new faces. You should be supportive, hoping that they continue to push for better fitness and a healthier lifestyle.

Just because you go to the gym frequently does not mean that you are any better than them. You aren’t. And you have zero right to make fun of them or belittle them for wanting to be there, doing the exact same thing you’re doing.

With all this being said, to the new gym-goers, make sure that you are being polite there, as well. Don’t use multiple pieces of equipment at once if they’re in high demand, be respectful of others, and keep your opinions and criticisms to yourself. However, if you’re being considerate of everyone, and you’re simply doing your own thing, then you are in the right and doing absolutely nothing wrong.

New gym-goers, congratulations on your decision to improve your health and fitness and I hope for nothing but success and positive outcomes for you. Frequent gym-goers, try to be understanding of the position they are in, and learn how to share the gym. It’s a place for everyone. Rather than tearing each other down and criticizing one another, we should be working together for the same goal: maintaining a healthy body and lifestyle. Make a conscious effort to be welcoming and accepting of everyone who is aiming to reach this outcome. Everyone is in the same boat; find it in you to not only be understanding of all the new faces, but happy for them as well.

 

Contact the author at chealy16@wou.edu

The effects of word choice this season

Caity Healy | Lifestyle Editor

Pop quiz, which of the following would be the least offensive for the majority? A, “merry Christmas,” B, “happy Christmas” or C, “happy holidays.” If you answered A or B, you’re likely not thinking of others and what they might celebrate this winter season. If you answered C, then congratulations, you clearly care about others and their cultures.

While it may seem easy to just say “merry Christmas,” as many of you probably have for years and already have the tendency to do, you need to realize that you’re excluding several different cultures and religions. And while many who experience this may not speak up about it, they may just not feel comfortable enough to say that what you’re doing is wrong or potentially offensive to them.

December is a month of multicultural holiday celebrations. The variety of different holidays celebrated ranges widely between Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, St. Lucia Day, Boxing Day, Yule, Omisoka and the list goes on. So to simply say “merry Christmas” means you’re actually leaving out a plethora of different minorities simply because you were unaware, or you’re simply being ignorant.

Doing this is in no way okay. If it’s something you’ve done in the past because you don’t know any better, then now is the time to start changing your speech. Just switch to “happy holidays,” as it includes everyone who celebrates anything, not just the ones who celebrate this one holiday.

However, if you have been saying “merry Christmas” to everyone simply to make a point or to avoid the so-called “war on Christmas,” then you are undoubtedly in the wrong. Choosing to ignore groups of people and discredit everything they believe in and celebrate is offensive and just plain rude.

How anyone can be so careless and inconsiderate of other cultures honestly blows my mind. When it comes down to it, saying “happy holidays” requires essentially the same amount of effort as saying “merry Christmas” does. And guess what? It still includes Christmas. It’s a win-win. You aren’t offending anyone, and you still get to include the holiday that you choose to celebrate.

If you still want to continue saying “merry Christmas” in 2017, then you also need to accept the fact that you are someone who chooses to be offensive on purpose. Accept the fact that you are someone who disregards other cultures or looks at them as less-than. Accept the fact that if someone chooses to say “happy Hanukkah” to you, then you have zero right to be offended. Are you willing to accept all of these things about yourself?

Rather than looking at saying “happy holidays” as an inconvenience, look at it as an opportunity to be appreciative and respectful of all cultures. It’s honestly amazing to look at other cultures and see everything they believe in and stand for — appreciate the differences that make us who we are. December is a month for us to grow culturally and be accepting of others. Choose to be on the right side of this shift; when the opportunity arises, choose “happy holidays.”

 

Contact the author at chealy16@wou.edu

Trump v. Free Speech

Photo by Paul F. Davis
Stephanie Blair | Editor-in-Chief

Being a journalist with disdain for Donald Trump is not a new phenomenon. However, I’d like to take these few column inches to give a fuller explanation as to why I — as a journalist and not as anything else — have a particular problem with him.

Donald J. Trump has no respect for the press and its role in society but, even worse, he has no respect for the First Amendment.

His list of assaults on the First Amendment is almost as long as the list of his assaults on women, so I can’t enumerate all of them. However, for some context, in February of 2016, before his election, Trump stated, “one of the things I’m going to do if I win — and I hope I do, and we’re certainly leading — is I’m going to open up our libel laws, so when they (the media) write purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of money.”

Okay, so he wants to partially repeal the First Amendment. But hey, that was pre-election. He said lots of things before the election. But what has he said now that he has been elected?

Most recently, he tweeted that NBC should have their broadcasting license revoked because the stories they report are damaging to his reputation and, he claims, false.

On Oct. 11, Trump started the day by tweeting, “with all of the Fake News coming out of NBC and the Networks, at what point is it appropriate to challenge their License? Bad for country!” Later in the day, he continued, saying, “network news has become so partisan, distorted and fake that licenses must be challenged and, if appropriate, revoked. Not fair to public!”

Not only is shutting down news sources simply because they don’t help the agenda of the government absurd and a blatant violation of the First Amendment, but him threatening to do so is, too.

In 2015, the Seventh Circuit stated that “a public official who tries to shut down an avenue of expression of ideas and opinions through ‘actual or threatened imposition of government power or sanction’ is violating the First Amendment,” in the case of Backpage.com v. Dart.

Either our president is completely unfamiliar with our Bill of Rights, or he simply doesn’t care. Given how vocal he’s been about the Second Amendment, I would guess the latter. And that should scare the daylights out of every citizen in our country.

Even Thomas Jefferson, the slave owning, rapist, P.O.S. that he was, recognized that “our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.”

 

Contact the author at sblair13@wou.edu

The delta of fashion

Paul F. Davis | Photo Editor

Since the term “fashion” was first keyed, it has always been centered around the craft and artistry of skilled seamstresses and how they could manipulate their materials into wearable pieces of art.

In the 1800s, women’s and men’s clothing were made exclusively out of natural cloths, such as cotton, wool, leather and silk, so the only way to show the level of fashionability was through intricacy of design. This intricacy meant that clothing was heavy, unwieldy and uncomfortable when compared to today’s standards. But with the turn of 20th century in sight, the discomfort that fashion posed began to change.

In 1884, rayon was invented: the first synthetic clothing material. Later, when rayon was released to the masses, it was praised because it was a cheap stand-in for silk, something that was very spendy at the time. This new wonder material ushered in a new age of material science breakthroughs because people no longer wanted to feel restrained by their clothes, and they now knew that that request was not unreasonable. Materials like nylon, polyester, velcro and spandex along with other production techniques were created soon after.

With this change from natural to artificial materials, fashion was forever changed. One could make statements about their fashionability without super complicated patchwork; all a person needed now was a shirt that could be anything with one screenprint.

With the turn of a new century, the process of creating new and more desirable science fiction materials into science fact is accelerating. Materials, and the production of those materials, is quickly becoming an equal or even more important part of fashion than the style of the clothing itself, which is a change from the past.

In the last decade, the most coveted and acclaimed pieces of clothing have not been known for their cut or style; they have almost exclusively focused on the material used. Yeezy Boosts, a shoe that can resell for up to $1,300 even though it has a simple silhouette is rather coveted for their sole material: Boost. This material claims that it has the highest energy return of any sole ever invented.  In addition to the Boost’s high energy return qualities, these shoes have been credited with re-establishing Adidas atop the sportswear sector, a spot they were quickly beginning to lose.

Another material that created excitement in the fashion industry was created in a collaboration between Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Reebok, a material called Biologic, the first bio-dynamic material to be integrated into clothing. Biologic is bacteria culture sandwiched between two layers of latex cover that when exposed heat will begin to fold due to a size increase in the bacteria. This folding property, when combined with another fabric, can create a material that will actively cool off the user and warm the user when temperature is correct.

In the near future, materials will be the only thing that matter when choosing fashion and we will soon scoff at the fashion of past for its ridiculous over-complication a future that we all should look forward to.

 

Contact the author at pfdavis14@wou.edu

Sports’s missing motivators

Jim Purdy | Guest Contributor

For almost 20 years now, I’ve been a supporter of Western Oregon sports, with season tickets to volleyball, basketball (men and women) and football. But, I never attended this school.

I actually graduated from a Division I school which won three national titles in football alone. They also put teams in the NCAA basketball tournament and managed to get into multiple elite-eights, final fours, plus numerous college world series. Interestingly enough, that same Division I school enrolled fewer undergraduates than Western during my time there, and still managed to field solid athletic teams in spite of being a pure-engineering school. Back then, you couldn’t get a degree other than a BS, MS or PhD, and there were no liberal arts schools because everybody had to take calculus, chemistry and physics.

So, how did they pull off this feat? Simple. They used the big three philosophy: recruit student athletes (equal emphasis on studies and athletics), employ motivating and skilled coaches and rally the fan base to every stinking game. It works, folks. 5,000 undergrad students and three national football titles!

Western can get there too. Western’s men’s basketball team made it to the title game just a couple of years ago, but it takes all three to prove once was not a fluke.

Western’s volleyball team has solid student athletes, perhaps the best class at every skill position in at least five years. Coach Tommy Gott seems to have them sufficiently motivated, and undoubtedly will produce winning teams in another year or so. For the volleyball home opener, the statistics sheet showed attendance of 850 at the match. For games one and two, I suspect there were 750 Western fans and perhaps 100 Northwest Nazarene fans. The vast majority of the Western fans were students. That’s a great start on that big three philosophy talented student-athletes, solid coaching and great fan support.

For those first two games of the match, the fan support buoyed the Western team to an amazing set of victories. These were actually easy victories, considering Northwest Nazarene was undefeated and Western was barely 50-50 on the season.

I sat on Western’s side of the old gym for those two games and would attest to the solid fan support. It was loud and boisterous. I moved to the other side of the court for the third game because Wolfie, the mascot who stands about 6’-6” tall and whose head is almost half as wide as he/she is tall, insisted on standing right in front of my seat for most of the two games. From the other side of the court, I could see all of the game, but also noticed a steady stream of fans leaving the student section.

I suspect half of the student fan base never saw the amazing way Northwest Nazarene, and their uber-involved coach, took control of that pivotal third game. With the score 16-10 in Western’s favor, Nazarene’s coach called his second and final time-out. That time-out didn’t seem to stop the point-bleeding for Nazarene, but it was critical nonetheless.  

Western fans continued to stream out. It was as if there was some kind of curfew looming at around 8:30 p.m. and nobody wanted to get caught in the old gym. The critical mass of fan support for Western vaporized and Nazarene stepped up their play a notch. A corner was turned, and the entire momentum of the game shifted. A few minutes later the Nazarene coach stepped up his critique of the officiating and the scorekeeping, and I still don’t understand how the score changed — but it did. Nazarene won that game, and turned the rest of the games into a match-winning nightmare for Western.

The match, which should have ended much earlier than it did at something close to 25-20 for Western in a deciding third game in an amazing 3-0 shut-out, lasted far too long in a narrow Nazarene victory at three games to two. Western actually had more points, 70.5 to 69, and posted three double-digit-kill-players to only two for Nazarene. In short, and on paper, they played better than Nazarene and still lost the match.

By the time the end of the fourth game came for Western, there were probably as many Nazarene fans as there were Western fans and most of the student section had abandoned their team for something else.  

In the tie-breaking fifth game, the Nazarene fan base was vocally superior to Western’s and that may have been a significant contributing factor to Western’s loss. After all, they had Nazarene on the rope well past the midpoint in that third and potentially deciding game, but still Western managed to lose momentum and ultimately lose the match.

Gott will eventually learn how to work the courtside official like that Nazarene coach. A good coach is like a seventh player who can’t actually touch the ball when it’s in play, but can affect the game at critical moments. Nazarene’s coach certainly earned his coaching salary in that pivotal third game. He kept up the coaching pressure in the fourth and fifth games as well.

Western’s student fan base has some distance to go. To paraphrase a favorite old poetic piece, “they have miles to go before they sleep.” They need to stay for the whole game if Western is going to challenge in the GNAC.

When the fan base was there and vocally supporting the Western players, the Western players responded. In fact, they dominated the other team. When the fan volume diminished, it was like the “extra” player they needed for that domination just left the game.

Fans don’t actually win games, and neither do coaches. Student athletes win games — but fans and coaches can be significant contributors to a loss.

Gott will quickly grow into a fine coach, and a winning coach who works right up to the end no matter if it’s a win or a loss.

I wonder if Western’s student fan base can do the same. My twenty years of watching Western’s athletes do their thing suggests they might need to stick around and support their team right up to the end, no matter if it’s a win or a loss.

Contact the editor at journaleditor@wou.edu to publish a response.

Newsflash: WOUNews is no news

Stephanie Blair | Editor-in-Chief

I know I may be a little biased on the issue as an aspiring journalist in the age of fake news and  “alternative facts” but this is the opinion section, so hear me out.

@WOUNews is not news — and no, that’s not The Western Journal’s handle on social media.

Ever since I arrived at Western in 2014, it’s bothered me that the public relations sector of the school — officially known as “Marketing and Communications” — has slapped the name “WOU News” on the school’s social media accounts. And, I know, a social media account by any other name would still look as sweet, but this is a line I can’t bear to see crossed.

Public relations is not news — it’s propaganda.

The word “news” is defined by Merriam-Webster as “a report of recent events.” Reporting the news is not what a public relations team does: they report good news. The kind of news that will bring up enrollment and increase donor funding, but not news about things which would damage Western’s image — like the racist graffiti that was painted in April on a door in the Wolfpack Village, targeting a student living across the street from the university.

WOUNews and WOU Stories provide a shining image of Western alongside cute memes and artistically shot photos of our campus rather than a realistic picture of what being a student at Western is like. And I can’t fault them for that — it’s their job.

It is the responsibility of a PR team to make their employer attractive to the public and to handle any blemishes on that employer’s image with grace. On the other hand, it is the responsibility of a reporter to inform the public of the truth about recent events.

The dichotomy between a news source and a PR department is a strong one, though it may be subtle at first glance.

I’m not trying to say that public relations is an immoral profession or that it shouldn’t exist — simply that we should call a spade “a spade.”

Hey, Marketing and Communications — give it up. You’re a spade, babe.

 

Contact the author at sblair13@wou.edu

Another fish bites the dust

Illustration by Elissa Sorenson
Zoë Strickland | Managing Editor

When I was growing up, my mom told me and my brother that we weren’t allowed to have pets that we couldn’t easily flush down the toilet. Though this has since changed, the overall sentiment is still true fish are easy.

It’s culturally accepted that we shouldn’t get attached to pet fish. They’re thought of as one of the most disposable living beings that you can have. So disposable that we give them away to anyone who is willing to grab a plastic cup.

Every year, a club on campus gives out feeder fish during new student week. For those who don’t know, feeder fish are inexpensive fish that are often bought in bulk and used to feed other large aquatic animals such as sharks and larger fish.

As “Finding Nemo” taught us all: fish are friends, not food. Or, in this case, not gimmicks.

Feeder fish aren’t meant to be kept as pets, they’re meant to be prey. That’s why it’s a miracle that any fair or carnival fish lasts longer than a few weeks. Like other mass-bred animals, such as chickens, feeder fish are raised in restrictive environments that then have a negative impact on their overall health. When bred, they’re kept in crowded tanks and underfed- all in an effort to keep them from growing.

Because feeder fish are supposed to be used as food, they’re cheap.

A company that specializes in selling feeder fish, www.livefeederfish.com, has a package of 1000 goldfish for $200. Giving away goldfish is a low-budget operation, which is why it’s so naturally appealing.

I don’t particularly have a problem with the existence of feeder fish; it’s natural for larger fish to eat smaller ones, so they serve a purpose.

My problem comes when integrating students into the mix. Going to the fair as a child and getting a goldfish is one thing; you’re young and your parents will most likely be taking care of it. Getting a goldfish as a reward for filling out a survey during an over-crowded event is completely different. Students who are just coming to college need to learn how to take care of themselves before they should learn to care for another living thing.

It’s a fish, but it’s still work. Are they going to remember to feed it before they go to their night class? Do they have a car to drive to get food and tank-cleaning supplies? Do they even have a sufficient sink to clean the tank in? Fish, especially ones like feeder fish that have been raised in less-than-great environments, require specific tank temperatures, a tank large enough that it won’t further stunt their growth, food and aquarium maintenance.

Giving away a living creature shouldn’t be an afterthought. It shouldn’t be a reward for a student who devotes thirty seconds to filling out a piece of paper. If a student truly wants a pet fish, they should devote time to thinking about whether or not they have the resources to take care of one.

What happens over Thanksgiving or winter break when a student goes home? Who’s going to take care of a fish in an empty dorm?

That is, if it makes it past day four.

 

Contact the author at zstrickland14@wou.edu