Mount Hood

Get your head out of the clouds

By: Stephanie Blair
Editor-in-Chief

So, space is great and all, but no one is going to make it to the TRAPPIST-1 planets in our lifetime. Not only do we not have the technology, but the distance makes it physically impossible. Maybe it’s my deep-rooted pessimism or my penny-pinching upbringing, but I think that maintaining this planet is more important than trying to reach another planet, let alone another solar system.

I’m all for excitement and hope, but shouldn’t it be placed in something tangible? Get excited about humanity reaching Mars, okay. Dream about going to the moon on a SpaceX tourism trip, sure. But spending time being excited about the possibility of reaching TRAPPIST-1 is on par with panicking about the sun’s inevitable collapse that will result in the earth being engulfed in flames.

It’s just not a practical use of energy; it’s not happening in this lifetime.

So, what is a practical use of energy? Going super Al Gore on your friends.

Work to lower your personal carbon footprint: grow plants, recycle, go vegetarian. Heck, join the Green Team on campus!

There are so many ways to help slow, and eventually reverse, climate change, which would negate the necessity of moving humanity to another planet.

Well, at least until it comes time for the great sun collapse.

That’s not to say we shouldn’t work towards reaching other planets for the sake of science: I’m all for NASA checking out Mars. The keyword here is necessity; humanity shouldn’t be seeking ways to other planets because we have to, or worse, because people just didn’t want to clean up their own mess.

If a reversal remedy for cavities was found, making drilling and filling obsolete, wouldn’t you rather keep your original teeth? Think about the shift in attitude that would surround the dentist: no more dread and shame, just a nonchalant partnership to repair what’s been damaged. Why not work towards this with our planet? Especially when it’s so easy and there’s so much work to be done. Come on, y’all.

I’m glad that the TRAPPIST-1 discovery has provided some with a spot of excitement in these heavy, politically charged times, but it’s too little, too soon to reasonably hold as hope.

Contact the author at sblair13@wou.edu

How do you solve a problem like misrepresentation?

By: Stephanie Blair
Editor-in-Chief

Each year the Ralph J. Bunche Center publishes a “Hollywood Diversity Report” which examines the diversity of gender and race in all aspects of Hollywood, from writing to acting, directing to talent agencies. Despite minorities making up around 40 percent of America’s population, the film industry is underwhelmingly diverse. This is, in large part, due to the lack of diverse parts.

Viola Davis put it best in her 2015 Emmy speech: “You cannot win an Emmy for roles that are simply not there.”

Whitewashing in Hollywood isn’t a new problem, but the Asian community seems to receive the worst of it. There often aren’t Asian roles, and when there are, they are often still given to white people. While yellow-face seems outrageous to most now, it’s present in a classic film: the most racist acting I’ve ever seen comes from Mickey Rooney in “Breakfast at Tiffany’s.” What’s disappointing is that this is still happening over half a century after that disgusting performance, yellow-face may have disappeared but now, instead, race is simply being visually erased.

The stereotypes are not the sole focus of the characters anymore, but even when there is an Asian role, it’s often given to a white actor. Recent examples of this include Emma Stone, a freckle-covered red-head, being cast as a half-Asian character in “Aloha” and Scarlett Johansson being cast as Motoko Kusanagi in “Ghost in the Shell.”

And this goes beyond race; Deaf representation is severely lacking in Hollywood as well. In the 2016 film “Hush” Kate Siegel, a hearing actress, plays a deaf character. While her acting was convincing to a hearing audience, there are a plethora of deaf actresses who could have played the part just as easily. This film didn’t even have the excuse that they wanted a well-known actress to lead; Siegel, who co-wrote the film, decided to play the part herself rather than cast a deaf actress.

The danger of casting hearing people in Deaf roles is the misrepresentation. Last year, Ben Jarashow came to Western to give a talk titled “The Cycle of Ideology: The Image of Deaf People in Hollywood.” In the presentation, Jarashow shared some of the common misrepresentations of Deaf people in films and television from the start of film to the present because this is a very real problem still facing the Deaf community.

These decisions erase identity for people of color, the LGBTQ+ community, the Deaf community and countless other societal groups. They can also perpetuate wrong information and harmful stereotypes. The Bunche Center’s 2015 report stated that “films with relatively diverse casts enjoyed the highest median global box office receipts and the highest median return on investment.” There’s not even an economical reason not to include more diverse roles.

So, what can a lowly college student do to affect Hollywood? Boycott! This is a time honored tradition that works.

In June of 2016, a stage production of “Prince of Egypt” was in the works as a park concert that would potentially head for Broadway later on. However, in a play about Egyptians and middle-eastern Jews, the cast was entirely white. This sparked controversy and backlash online which ultimately led to the concert being cancelled.

Speaking out about representation can work, boycotting can work, but only if people take part. Don’t support films that whitewash and that don’t represent a character and help support minority communities.

Contact the author at sblair13@mail.wou.edu

Speak while everyone’s watching

By: Ashton Newton
Entertainment Editor

Celebrity activism has always been a big deal in the world of entertainment. Whether celebrities speak out by taking to social media or writing targeted speeches for award shows, the wide audiences that popular celebrities reach make for an opportunity for their voices to make a large impact. No matter the issue, or whether I’m for or against it, celebrities sparking up discussions is healthy for society and gets people thinking.

Celebrities speaking out about the election, both for and against President Trump, has been big in the news lately, but celebrity activism is far from a new thing. 

One of the most notable examples was during the 1973 Oscars, when Marlon Brando refused to attend the ceremony or accept his award for best actor in “The Godfather” to protest the treatment of Native Americans by the film industry and at Wounded Knee. Instead, an Apache trade member named Sacheen Littlefeather was sent to announce that he couldn’t accept the award.

Leonardo DiCaprio used his award platforms for “The Revenant” to discuss issues as well. During his speech for best actor at The Golden Globes, DiCaprio advocated for the Native Americans who live in the areas where the film was made.

“I want to share this award with all the First Nations peoples represented in this film and all the indigenous communities around the world. It is time we recognized your history and that we protect your indigenous lands from corporate interests,” said DiCaprio.

Award speeches are moments where fellow celebrities, the media and massive audiences of people all have eyes on someone, and I think bringing up a social cause that most people wouldn’t think of is a great thing to do while everyone is listening.

Afterwards, people take to social media voicing their opinions on what was said. While some individuals are mean and hurtful, a lot of people honestly voice their opinions on either side of the issue. The sharing of opinions, the small dinner table debates, it’s what creates a healthy, thoughtful and intelligent society.

Numerous celebrities took to the streets for the Jan. 21 Women’s March, using their voices to reach wide audiences with information and encouragement; Scarlett Johansson, Lady Gaga and Cher were all present at the Women’s March in Washington DC. Among the celebrities present, there was also actor and comedian Nick Offerman, who took to Twitter voicing his support and sharing photos of the march.

Whether it’s marching for causes, speaking out on Twitter or dedicating an award speech to a cause, celebrity activism provokes thinking and is positive for society.

Contact the author at anewton15@wou.edu

Individualism in a state of togetherness

By: Kristin Norman
Copy Editor

Being in a healthy relationship can help someone learn about themselves and what they need from another person. As a young, recently married person, I have a lot of growing to do despite my personal relationship. In what many call a process of self-actualization, I will spend the rest of my life working to love and know myself more.

While it is great having someone hold me accountable for my actions, challenging me to be a better person and encouraging me in my efforts, the bottom line is that only I can decide to change.

Nobody else can do the difficult task of self-improvement for me. I’ve witnessed far too many people my age seek out self-fulfillment in others while forgetting that they are not who they date.

That being said, I don’t agree with the idea that people should only try dating as a means to understanding who they are and what they want. This way of thinking implies that singledom is something to be overcome instead of embraced.

It may sound overly cliché coming from a married person, but there are times when I miss the independence that comes with being single. Singleness provides the opportunity to explore avenues of life without the influence of another person. However, I also believe it’s possible to be with someone who doesn’t hinder your ability to explore those avenues.

With Valentine’s Day just around the corner, remember that being in college is a masterful balancing act that involves the process of self-actualization. If you’re single: be empowered and take the opportunity to know and love yourself. If you’re in a committed relationship: find time to better yourself with the help of someone you love.

Please contact the author at keck14@wou.edu.com

Loving thyself

By: Keith Mathew
Photo Editor

When do we think of ourselves as good people? Do we even think that at all? As a society that thrives on self-deprecating jokes, we start to believe the jokes we create for ourselves on a subconscious level. I see a large majority of people I know who don’t think they’re good people, or at least to the level of everyone else around them.

I am one of those people who doesn’t think highly of themselves. It has taken me a long time to get to the point of starting to improve myself. It takes an immense amount of effort to start the process and to continue it. The most common thing people say is “fake it until you make it.” It’s kind of true; having fake confidence in one’s self is a trial run of the ultimate goal. Fake confidence is the start of getting comfortable with the idea and feeling or acting confident.

I feel the reason most people have low self-esteem or a lack of confidence comes from the tendency to compare ourselves to other people: I’m not as smart as them, I’m not as cool as them, I’m not as masculine as them, I’m not as fit as them. These comparisons are harmful. They put us down because we aren’t at the level of another person. We think that because we aren’t at the same level we are lesser than, thus creating a negative self-image.

There is a common thought process for people with low self-image that they should be working on themselves before they start to date another person. It annoys me because it takes a lot to work on yourself and another person may actually help. Another person may open the mind to improving and the love of another person can help heal, repair, fix and improve.

The love of another person pushes the other to try and to become better. I bet no one was 100 percent confident in themselves when another person came along. That line of thinking just doesn’t help, having another person is not bad, it is good for loving one’s self.

With my experiences of low self-image, friends and family try to make me feel better by complimenting me however, because of the compliments I feel bad for not feeling better about myself. The problem is not whether I know I’m good or not, it’s the feeling. I know that I’m smart, I know I’m nice, I know that I’m amazing but the feeling is not there to back it up.

It is my goal this term to improve myself and to have real confidence, not just the fake kind. The best way to improve is to have a mantra, a saying to tell yourself how great and amazing you are. Sounds cheesy but it does help. Self-love is a process and it’s hard work.

Contact the author at kmathew14@wou.edu

The women’s march doesn’t stop here

By: Zoe Strickland
Managing Editor

The past 19 days have been full of marches and protests. From the National Women’s Marches across the country to the Science March that’s being planned planned for Earth Day, people are trying to make sure that their voices are heard.

The National Women’s March was one of the largest marches in history; people of all genders and nationalities came together to express their opposition to the inauguration. Among those protesters was a large volume of white, able-bodied, cisgendered women. Hell, the hats that were being knitted for the Women’s March were essentially a representation of cisgendered genitalia.

I get that people tend to feel attacked when you bring this up, but this is something that should be brought up. My problem with white cis-women showing up in droves to march comes when you compare the crowds at the Women’s March to the crowds at nearly every other protest or march around the country – crowds that get less attention because this section of the population isn’t there. The public are more likely to reflect positively about an event if white women are there; it makes no sense, but that’s institutionalized prejudice for you.

The amount of people marching across the country was massive; it was great. But where are those crowds of people during Black Lives Matter protests? Where are they during the uprise against the Dakota access pipeline? What are they doing to help the Flint water crises?

If you marched or wanted to march at the National Women’s March, remember to keep your views intersectional. Remember that there are people who may not have an identity similar to yours that still need to be supported. Transgender and gender-nonconforming people need to be supported. People with disabilities need to be supported. People of different races need to be supported. Just because a protest or march may not apply to you, doesn’t mean you can dismiss it and just not pay attention.

When you look at how many people protested in Portland after the election and then look at which of those people actually voted in the election, there’s a massive disconnect. The Oregonian reported that of the 112 people arrested at the protest, only 28 percent of them actually voted and that 32 percent voted but didn’t turn in their ballot.

Even though the Women’s March exists as a result of the anticipated anti-women policies of the current administration, CNN reported that 52 percent of white women voted for Donald Trump. This half-hearted attempt at showing discontent won’t get things done.

The people who are against the Trump administration and their policies have four more years- activist efforts shouldn’t be confined to just the months surrounding the election and inauguration.

All of these marches and protests mean nothing if you pick and choose which causes to support. Just because you obtain rights that you’re comfortable with, doesn’t mean the job is done; it just means that you are currently more privileged.

Protests and activism are a vital part of our rights as citizens – why not take advantage of that right? In our current digital age, you don’t have an excuse for not being an active member of society. If you can’t make it to a protest, you can still talk about it. You can still stay educated, you can still educate other people.

Contact the author at zstrickland14@wou.edu

A new time to help Tibet

By: Burke De Boer
Sports Editor

With last week’s inauguration of a new president came an immediate question on everyone’s mind: what about Tibet?

Well, maybe not so much. President Donald Trump came to power basing his campaign on economic issues. When he did address foreign policy it usually came from an economic bent: notably his promise to renegotiate Chinese trade deals.

Unfortunately, it’s been some time since Tibet’s occupation has been a heavily discussed issue in America. But the international community has been reacting to a fresh and recent attack on Tibetan culture from the Chinese government.

Larung Gar is the largest Tibetan Buddhist academy in the world and last summer China set upon it, demolishing buildings and physically removing nuns and monks that live there. 4,500 people have already been removed as the Chinese government approaches its population target of 5,000. This time last year, over 10,000 people resided in Larung Gar.

I am reminded of last year’s calamity at Standing Rock, which saw an outpouring of support from our community. Enough to move the planned pipeline.

However America has been unable to pressure China to relax on Tibet. This has been the case ever since China soured on Soviet relations.

America has had a strange relationship with Beijing ever since former President Jimmy Carter abandoned Taiwan to exclusively recognize the People’s Republic as the Chinese government.

Trump took on the Obama Administration’s handling of China throughout his campaign. His promises of aggressive trade and renegotiations with China did excite some Tibetans. Prime Minister-in-exile, Lobsang Sangay, expressed optimism in an interview with Reuters, calling Trump’s view of China a “realistic” one.

When, as president-elect, Trump accepted a phone call from Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen, it became the first time that the two nations’ leaders had spoken since 1979. Some were worried that this would anger Beijing. What they fail to see is how abandoning a one-China policy would give the American government better leverage to pressure the People’s Republic on Tibetan oppression.

But if Trump is realistic on China, we should also be realistic on Trump. He could potentially be the best ever president for Tibet, but this is the man who wrote “The Art of the Deal.”

It’s impossible to rule out the idea of Tibet and Taiwan being used as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations. In fact it seems more likely from a president who campaigned based on economic issues more so than foreign policy.

Which is why activist organization in the Tibetan cause is so important. We saw the power of activism to stop government powers at Standing Rock. But international activism is severely and consistently undermined by trade relations.

If the new president follows through in establishing a tough stance on China it will only strengthen the movement for Tibet.

There is reason to be optimistic, and reason to think the actions at Larung Gar can be stopped. It’s not that Trump will be a pro-Tibet president; a firmer stance on the People’s Republic from the United States will only provide solid footing for pressure from outside of the new administration.

Organized activist movements like Students For a Free Tibet and the NGO Free Tibet lead the way for international pressure on China and they will continue to do so. In the coming years I see their position only becoming stronger.

Contact the author at bdeboer11@mail.wou.edu

In defense of the genre: musicals

By: Jade Rayner
News Editor

As an Arts major with an emphasis in theatre, I’ve learned to break apart scripts and movies and, at times, over-analyze and search for meaning in shows that I watch. A common idea among those around me is that a story must be complex or have a deeper meaning to be interesting. While that’s a valid thought, it discredits shows that focus on spectacle over plot; particularly a large portion of musicals that invoke just as much, if not more, feeling in a wider range of audiences.

“La La Land” is easily described on the Internet Movie Database as, “A jazz pianist falls for an aspiring actress in Los Angeles.” The musical starring Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone won a record-breaking seven Golden Globes awards, along with many others since its Dec. 9, 2016 release. Upon finishing the movie, I was disappointed due to the lack of a complex plot. The story is one that has appeared time and time again, especially in musicals: a woman aspires to become famous, falls in love and in the end everything works out. The simplicity is one that can easily infuriate those who go to the cinema to be served with a challenging plot filled with risky ideas. I see it otherwise.
Now, take a moment to think about how a simple plot could result in something much more impactful than one might have originally considered, specifically in the musical genre. A complex plot needs time and focus on the story in order to achieve its goal. Without the words, an audience can get easily lost, and in my case, will result in losing interest.

Musicals are an important bridge that brings enthusiasts of theatre, regular movies and TV together. Why? Because of the spectacle that the musical genre is known for. Simplicity in plot gives room for the characters to sing and dance as a way of expressing emotion, which can be consistently more attention-grabbing than spoken dialogue in a roughly two hour movie.

Along the same lines as “La La Land,” “The Last Five Years” is a fairly simple story about the relationship of Jamie, an upcoming novelist, and struggling actress Cathy from beginning to their not-so-happy ending. Although the story of the musical can be described in a single sentence, the style it’s portrayed in is anything but bland. For Cathy, the story goes in reverse chronological order, and Jamie’s side moves in chronological order. The style in which the story is told adds complexity, which works well because of the simple plot.

Next time you leave the theater disappointed because the plot didn’t open up a realm of new ideas, or make a ground-breaking statement, take a moment to reflect on how the cinematography or music affected your emotions. Power can come from more than words.

Contact the author at jrayner14@wou.edu

Remember that money talks

By: Zoe Strickland
Managing Editor

Why is it, that when someone famous is accused of a crime, it rarely ever affects them?

Last year, Johnny Depp was accused of domestic abuse by his then-wife Amber Heard. Despite clear evidence that Heard had been injured, people still took Depp’s side. Even now, after their

NEW YORK, NY – JUNE 25: Actor Johnny Depp enters the “Late Show With David Letterman” taping at the Ed Sullivan Theater on June 25, 2013 in New York City. (Photo by Ray Tamarra/FilmMagic)

divorce has been settled some, including Depp’s lawyers, claim that Heard was only trying to prolong her time in the spotlight, even though she’s an actress with multiple forthcoming movies.

Abusing Heard barely put a dent in Depp’s career. According to the Internet Movie Database, he is slated to have ten roles within the next two years.

Depp is nowhere near the only celebrity whose abusive tendencies have been overlooked in favor of their career. Bill Murray, Gary Oldman, Michael Fassbender, John Lennon and Chris Brown are only some of the people who make the list.

As a society, we need to start asking ourselves why we justify spending our money supporting people who commit crimes, why we assist in breeding a culture that inherently sides with the accused.

Though the accusations against Depp had nothing to do with his career, the money and power he obtained as a result of his celebrity status most likely played a role in how the domestic abuse accusations were perceived.

People in my life have made the argument that a celebrity’s personal life shouldn’t play a role in how their professional work is viewed. I disagree.

We exist in a money-driven, power-hungry society. Consuming the work of someone who has been accused of something like domestic violence is still a form of promotion; your views and ‘likes’ and ‘shares’ are still building revenue. You’re putting money in the hands of the people who do things you don’t agree with, and money talks.

After all, when Tiger Woods cheated on his wife he lost multiple sponsorship deals. If something like infidelity can have a negative impact on someone’s career, why does abuse not result in a similar outcome?

If Disney sees that people are going to theatres to see the next “Pirates” movie, they are more likely to use its lead, Johnny Depp, in their movies.

According to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, one in three women and one in four men will be victims of domestic violence in their lifetime. Rather than spending your money on a movie or CD by a celebrity who has committed an act of violence, consider putting that money towards helping victims of domestic violence.

You can donate to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence by going to ncadv.org.

Contact the author at zstrickland14@wou.edu.

Editor’s Note

By: Stephanie Blair
Editor-in-Chief

In light of the recent loss in our community, I felt that it was only appropriate to have our first issue of 2017 serve as a memorial for all those that were lost, both locally and globally, in 2016.

I, myself, lost my oldest brother in October and can’t begin to explain the impact that has screen-shot-2016-09-28-at-6-56-59-pmalready had on my life, let alone what will continue to happen for the rest of my life. The loss of any person is a cause for grief, but there’s a special suffering that comes when it’s someone young: someone like Alma, someone like my brother.

Grief encompasses more than death, however, because it’s a feeling of loss. Many of our students have experienced loss in the last year; loss of a loved one, loss of an idol, loss of feeling safe in our country. It’s in these seasons of intense loss that community is more important than ever.

Isolation is toxic. It feels sometimes like no one understands what’s happening in our lives but, even if that’s true, it doesn’t mean that no one can support you, can listen to you, can keep you company.

If there’s one thing I’ve found in my own struggle these past few months, it’s that community is everything. When my hometown got the news about my family’s loss, food was delivered daily to my parents, heartfelt apologies were extended; people rallied around us. I see such strong communities at Western and know that they have the same capability.

I would encourage anyone struggling this winter to join a club, pick up a part time job, start counseling, get involved at a church/temple/mosque. Do something that surrounds you with support, with friends.

Heck, if you want to come work for me, I’ll pay you and feed you pizza.

Please ask for help, even if you don’t think you need it. 2017 can be a beautiful year, but only if you’re around to see it.

Free counseling is available for all Western students at the Student Health and Counseling Center on campus; all services are confidential, and all counselors are state licensed professionals, counseling trainees, and/or graduate-level counseling interns.

A list of clubs on Western’s campus can be found on OrgSync, which can be accessed through Portal. WolfLink has all of the current job listings posted through Western’s Service Learning and Career Development Center.

Contact the author at journaleditor@mail.wou.edu