Mount Hood

ASWOU election deadline extended

By Jenna Beresheim and Madison McCammon
 Staff Writer and Freelancer

This year’s ASWOU elections have seen low enough initial turnout rates to cause the original close date for the polls to be extended from Friday, April 24.

This extension was put in place until enough votes have been submitted to have a legal election. Speaking on Thursday, April 30, ASWOU elections director Cat Bracken said that “turnout has improved enough that the elections will officially be closed on Friday, May 1, 2015 at 3 p.m.”

“We technically passed the turnout percentage required for the elections to be legal as of Thursday,” Bracken said, “but we wanted to keep the polls open longer to increase student representation.”

“In order for the election to be valid, we need 10 percent of the student population [to vote]…As of Friday, we didn’t have the 10 percent,” Alyssa Little said, a third year community health major.

“In an election that only has roughly 5,000 eligible voters, every single vote can make a difference. Please vote and make your voice heard,” said Megan Habermann, assistant director of the student leadership and activities board.

She added, “If you want to see change or see things continue, make that opinion known. ASWOU cannot represent students fairly and accurately without their input and involvement.”

The current candidates and incumbents alike have increased their efforts to encourage students to vote. OrgSync has been a notable change to ASWOU elections this year as students are required to cast their votes through OrgSync rather than through the portal as in years past. OrgSync is a relatively new platform for Western.

Some have found OrgSync difficult to use to the extent that it has prevented votes. However, other students have found the process easy. “I honestly think that elections were extended due to the difficulty of voting through OrgSync,” Alyssa Brooke Chiampi said, a second year public policy and administration student.

Third year business major Dacota Ashwill, said that voting involved “too much work; it is just too much effort to use,” when talking about the switch to OrgSync as a platform for organizing other events and campus info.

“It was really difficult to get to the voting page, it is kind of a doozy to find,” Kyler Freilinger said, a first year Integrated Science and Teaching major.

“College students thrive for simplicity, and I believe OrgSync created a difficult barrier,” Chiampi said, who is also running for ASWOU president.

She added: “I think OrgSync is great, but it is not so great for students that have not had the OrgSync training provided by the student leadership activities board.” Conversely, some students reported little to no difficulty in voting through OrgSync.

“It was pretty simple to use,” Becca Hazel said, a third year community health major. Hazel added that she felt the process was “pretty fast,” for it being her first time using OrgSync.

Many students also reported difficulty in attempting to find information concerning the candidates and bills before making their decision.

This process has been particularly difficult for off-campus students, such as Allissa Phoenix, an ASL studies fourth year student.

“I feel like this year there were not as many advertisements attracting students to vote,” Phoenix said. “This is unfortunate, but as college students we have a lot going on and need reminders around campus to compel us to participate and inform us on the issues in question.”

As the elections have reached their required turnout, results will be reported in next week’s Journal issue as well as the ASWOU OrgSync page.

Breaking the Silence

Addressing sexual assault on campus
By Laura Knudson
 Editor-in-Chief

With national discussion building in response to the 89 colleges under investigation for mishandling sexual assault cases, one thing has become glaringly hard to ignore: sexual violence can happen anywhere.

Since the start of this school year, half a dozen sexual assault cases have been reported at Western, according to Dr. Gary Dukes, vice president of student affairs.

“So far we’ve had the most consistent amount of referrals we’ve ever had,” said Andrea Doyle Hugmeyer, assistant director of Abby’s House, a resource and referral center available to persons of any gender for a number of issues.

In previous years, Doyle Hugmeyer said reports were scattered, with some months yielding no reports. So far, Abby’s House has had weekly referrals from sexual assault survivors since fall term started.

In 2013, six reports of sexual assault were filed with Campus Public Safety, and seven anonymous reports were filed with the Office of the Vice President of Student Affairs, according to Campus Public Safety’s published statistics, indicating that there may have been as many as 13 reported sexual assaults in 2013, or as few as six.

Although there is a rise in consistent reports already this year, it does not necessarily mean it’s happening more on campus. Doyle Hugmeyer said she hopes it means people are using Abby’s House as a resource more than before.

“I don’t know if people are reporting more because there is more support, but I think there is more awareness because of the culture,” said Nancy Minnick, Campus Public Safety Committee Scribe.

Students acknowledge sexual assault as a reality on campus. Whether it is sexual, verbal, or on social media, “assault happens here,” said Brittany App, Senior ASL major. “It happens everywhere.”

“Our campus doesn’t differ from anywhere else,” said Bryan Kelley, junior Humanities major.

Studies conducted since the 1980s have shown a consistent figure of one in four college women reporting that they survived either rape or attempted rape, at some point in their lifetime, according to oneinfourusa.org.

“Until that number is gone, it will always be an issue,” said Marissa Onshus-Womble, Advocate of Abby’s House.

A 2007 national rape study funded by the Department of Justice found 11 percent of college women who experience rape, report it to the police.

Rape is the least reported of all violent crimes according to a 2009 National Crime Victimization Survey.

DEFINING SEXUAL ASSAULT

In attempts to diminish sexual assault, the Obama administration launched their “It’s On Us” campaign in September, aimed at engaging men in prevention measures, effectively responding to assault by increasing transparency in the federal government’s effort to enforce laws.

However, campuses like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) found students were unsure of what constituted sexual assault. An MIT survey showed 17 percent of female students fit the sexually assaulted description, but only 11 percent checked yes on the survey when asked if they had been.
Dukes said victims are not always sure if they have been assaulted.

According to Western’s sexual misconduct web page, sexual misconduct is defined as non-consensual sexual contact. Sexual contact includes “touching of any private body part, including, but not limited to genitalia, buttocks, anus or breasts of another or causing such person to touch genitalia, anus, buttocks or breasts of another.” It also includes attempts to have non-consensual sexual contact, the threat of such contact, sexual exploitation, emotional/psychological abuse, sexual harassment and stalking.

The webpage categorizes behavior non-consensual if “no consent is freely given, the person is substantially impaired by alcohol or drugs, or the person is otherwise without the physical or mental capacity to give clear consent.”
When it comes to consent, Abby’s House supports the “Yes means yes” campaign. “Yes means yes” legislation adopted in states like California, put the focus of sexual consent on mutually agreed-upon sexual activity. Consent is mutual and continuous and requires partners to pay attention to physical and emotional cues as well.

Verbal consent should be repeated often, said Onshus-Womble.
“Just because you consented one time doesn’t mean you will the next,” she added.

“And you have the right to change your mind,” said Jessica Fontaine, another advocate for Abby’s House.

Both said students should consent every step of the way whether it be kissing or having sex.

For students who may still be unsure of whether or not they were assaulted, Fontaine said it was simple.

“The difference between someone who was raped and someone who wasn’t is that the person who was raped was in the presence of the rapist,” she said. “That’s the only factor.”

THE SURVIVORS YOU DON’T HEAR ABOUT

When most people hear the word rape, they visualize a woman being assaulted by a man, Doyle Hugmeyer said. But there are other victims we fail to acknowledge.

Males can be sexually assaulted, as can persons in same-sex relationships.

One in six men are found to have experienced sexual assault before age 18 according to 1in6.org.

 

“Abuse and assault is linked with asserting power and trying to control power happens in various forms,” Doyle Hugmeyer said. “You can be assaulted by someone of any gender or any sexual identity.”

The reason we don’t hear about male sexual assault is because men are typically viewed as physically stronger and more powerful than women, Doyle Hugmeyer said. “To be sexually assaulted means that the victim is put in the position of being controlled,” which is something we associate more with women, she added.

When men report sexual assault it “basically feminizes them,” she said.

Similarly, one reason we may not hear about same-sex relationship violence, is due to the “the layer of additional stress and barriers because some people are homophobic,” said Doyle Hugmeyer.

Despite stigmas and myths that sexual assault only happens to women, students acknowledge that it can happen to everyone.

“I believe that men can and sometimes are sexually assaulted, be it by men or by women,” said Isaac Golden, Junior Psychology major.”

Jenna Beresham, senior ALS major agreed saying, “Anyone of any race, gender, sexuality and so forth can be sexually assaulted.”

“I think that there are a lot of men on our campus that share these beliefs in the sense that they want to see change happen,” said Doyle Hugmeyer.

SURVIVING IN A VICTIM-BLAMING CULTURE

Victim blaming culture refers to an attitude that the survivor is at fault for their assault because of their behavior.

Deborah Thompson, executive director of Sable House, an organization in Dallas, serving domestic violence and sexual assault survivors, said, commonly used excuses for assault include: “She shouldn’t have been wearing that low-cut blouse,” “She was out late,” and “She didn’t fight it off.”

“I absolutely do not think any girl alive has asked to be assaulted,” said Bridget Conklin, senior English major.
Yet, some feel clothing options do play a role.

“Sexual assault can be intensified by choice of clothing and is a factor, but if someone intends to sexually assault, it doesn’t matter what is being worn by others,” said Jennifer P., senior.

The drug enforcement agency of the Department of Justice lists alcohol as the number one most common used drug in sexual assault

Dress attire and alcohol consumption could be reasons why some colleges aim sexual assault education at risk reduction, teaching students how to be safe.

Doyle Hugmeyer says while discussions of risk reduction are important in terms of staying conscious of safety, instructing potential rape victims to dress more modest or drink less should not be the only way to address sexual assault. It takes responsibility off the perpetrator, she says, and can be difficult to identify when discussion boarders on blame, ultimately making things worse for survivors.

“It’s a hard line to identify and try not to cross,” she said. “On one end it’s important to acknowledge how to stay safe on campus. But if that’s the strongest method that prevails in our community, we aren’t doing it the right way.”
In terms of improving how sexual assault is addressed on campus, “Eliminating the victim-blaming culture is the biggest thing we can do that,” said Fontaine.

PUTTING FOCUS ON THE PERPETRATOR

Focus should be placed on “not raping,” Doyle Hugmeyer said, and focusing on the offenders.

“We get a lot of models of sexual behavior from the media and often times sexuality is tied to power and control,” she said. “So if we were to change the model to reflect different behaviors like getting consent every step of the way, that would be huge in seeing sexual assault diminish.”

Most importantly, “If a woman tells you she was sexually assaulted – believe her,” said Doyle Hugmeyer. “That’s a big step in putting the attention on the perpetrator. It means that we are validating the experience.”
These conversations have occurred for quite some time, said Doyle Hugmeyer. “I think now is an appropriate time to formalize the conversation and put things into action on campus.”

Combating assault with campus-wide conversation

A men’s social justice group is in the works for Abby’s House, lead by advocate Kevin Gutierrez, in attempts to start a conversational group, discussing topics related of masculinity and gender norms.

“The goal is to create a campus discussion, said Doyle Hugmeyer. “We hope that clubs emerge out of that group that would essentially do educational programming and activism related to meet these issues from a male ally standpoint.”

After receiving grants from the WOU foundation, advocates also put together a media campaign, creating sexual violence posters and informational video clips.

A phone app will also be available on iTunes in a few weeks, providing campus and community resources and information on what to do if you experience sexual violence.

Through Western’s Campus Against Sexual Assault grant (CASA) from the U.S. Department of Justice, Abby’s House is looking into funding a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner. Doyle Hugmeyer said they would hire a “SAME” nurse on campus or in

Dallas to be available for “safe kits.” When a person is sexually assaulted they are able to seek a safe kit, which includes DNA swabbing, vaginal examination, urine samples and other forensic procedures.

“As of right now the closest nurse to do that is the Salem hospital,” Doyle Hugmeyer said, which can be a problem if the student does not have transportation.

In creating campaigns and starting discussion groups, the hope of Abby’s House is to create many opportunities for students to seek help. “It’s something every campus should be moving toward,” she said.

“Ideally we’d like to have an environment where sexual assault doesn’t happen,” said Dukes. “I generally feel like we are doing a good job, but clearly we can always do a better job.”

REPORTING SEXUAL ASSAULT

When asked what the first thing a victim should do after being sexually assaulted, Doyle Hugmeyer said, “It’s going to vary by victim, but go to a safe place.” She said this could be the counseling center, or to a member of the CARE team, a friend’s house or even to an Resident Assistant.

Abby’s House is also a place where victims can seek help from trained members in regard to referrals for sexual assault or just to come in and talk, Fontaine said.
The first step is confiding in a campus resource or someone you trust, Fontaine said. “We can’t have justice for our survivors if we don’t know that it happened to them.”

To report a sexual assault or seek help regarding sexual/domestic violence, contact Abby’s House at 503-838-8219, abbyshouse@wou.edu or stop by their location on the bottom floor of the Werner University Center, room 106. To file an official report for criminal action, call Campus Public Safety at 503-838-8481, or the Monmouth Police Department at 503-838-1109. To file a student conduct report, contact the WOU Office of Student Conduct at 503-838-8930.

IFC final decision sets fees for 2016 academic year

By Jack Armstrong
 News Editor

Below is the breakdown of student fees per term for the 2015-2016 school year. Students will pay $327 per term, which will be allocated to the following funded areas. The values listed below are based on the average of the projected enrollment for the 2015-2016 school year and the final decision from the IFC. Values were rounded up.

Screen shot 2015-04-24 at 3.33.09 PMAffordability for our students is paramount, and fundraising relieves the student body from increased cost to attend.”

Western’s incidental fee committee has had their proposed budget for the 2016 academic year officially approved by President Mark Weiss. This version of the budget is now set to take effect fall term of 2015-2016.

The IFC is a group of student leaders supervised by staff advisers. The only voting members of the process are the students who sit on the committee.

Incidental fees are collected separate from students’ tuition every term and are used for student clubs and activities that fall outside the realm of academics.

IFC voted through their final version of the budget Monday, Feb. 16. The proposal was then ratified by the Associated Students of Western Oregon University senate Wednesday, Feb. 18.

Once the budget was agreed upon by both student organizations, the decision was moved to President Weiss for final approval.

“I respect the diligence of the IFC members and the role of student senate in reaching a conclusion,” Weiss said. He approved the budget on first viewing within the five days allotted to him though the by-laws.

Now that the budget has been finalized by the administration, the per-term fee for 2015-2016 will increase $5 from 2014-2015 to $327, or $981 per year total.

This year’s decision was met with resistance from students and staff alike in departments who were chosen to take cuts. The athletics department received the heaviest cut, taking a 5 percent overall reduction in their budget.

Many student-athletes reacted angrily to this cut in the series of open hearings held by the IFC Thursday, Feb. 5, and Monday, Feb. 9. In fact, the majority of the students at the meeting were athletes looking to affect change in the committee’s course.

When Weiss was asked whether this turn-out had made his decision more difficult, he said, “I was made aware of certain changes to past funding levels, but I deferred to the democratic process in place.”

In addition to looking at a reduced budget, the athletics department also had some requested enhancements turned down.

Enhancements differ from the overall budgets because they are a one-term increase in funding for an organization to be put towards a specifically requested item.

The athletics department had been initially approved to receive a replacement on-field headset for the football program with a one-time enhancement priced at $43,712.

IFC decided to remove this enhancement in the final version of the budget in an attempt to keep the overall fee increase as low as possible.

During IFC’s presentation to the ASWOU senate Wednesday, Feb. 18, IFC member Jessica Hand said, “We have a responsibility to the entire student body to keep costs as affordable as possible, and any enhancements we approve should benefit as many students as possible.”

President Weiss said, “My experience has been that the approved budget is representative of views for those students that participate in the process, but the result may not necessarily represent the views of the student body as a whole.”

Similarly, IFC also decided against granting the enhancement that gives students free tickets to most of the school-run theater productions at Western.

“There wasn’t enough data provided by the department about student attendance to provide approval,” Hand said.

Now that the budget for next year is set, some clubs are already turning to fund raisers and other alternative forms of filling in the financial gaps.

Weiss believes that this approach is a good compromise and said, “I encourage all clubs to fundraise as much of the cost of their programs as possible.

2015 Pastega Award winners announced

By Jack Armstrong
News Editor

Western has announced the 2015 winners of the Pastega awards. Dr. Kevin Walczyk has been selected for the Excellence in Scholarship award and Dr. Maureen Dolan has been selected for the Excellence in Teaching award.

The Pastega awards are an annual honor given to two professors selected by students, faculty and the administration. According to Western’s website, the awards were created by “noted Oregon philanthropist Mario Pastega.”

Pastega donated to Western annually and part of that money was used to recognize educators who strove to push the students and the university to higher levels of excellence. The first recipients of the awards were honored in 1985, and it has been an annual ceremony since.

According to the Pastega Award website, the Pastega family made a $40,000 donation that was matched by the Oregon University System in 1997 to maintain the awards well into the future.

The Excellence in Teaching award is given to a professor who “engages, inspires and educates students to the greatest possible learning.”

The Excellence in Scholarship award is given to a professor who maintains “significant and enduring scholarly or creative achievement,” alongside their professorial duties. This can include ongoing research or publishing articles.

The decision on which professors will be honored is handled by the Pastega committee.

Chair of the committee Tom Bergeron said, “the work of choosing is done by the recipients from the two previous years,” in addition to a member of student government, and President Mark Weiss.

Last year’s winners were professor of history David Doellinger, awarded for Excellence in Scholarship, and the director of the writing center, professor of English Katherine Schmidt, was awarded for Excellence in Teaching.

The award is accompanied by a $1,000 honorarium.

Dr. Kevin Walczyk: Professor of Music

Dr. Kevin Walczyk grew up in a musically diverse family, and as a result he was exposed to an array of musical knowledge and styles from an early age.
This knowledge and exposure soon turned into a passion and he continued his musical pursuits throughout his time in college at Pacific Lutheran University and University of North Texas.

While attending university, Walczyk shifted his interests from playing and enjoying music to composition. Walczyk said that composition seemed “unexplored and invigorating.”

Upon his graduation, Walczyk looked for a way to translate and convey his passion for composition to the younger generation, which pushed him to move into teaching.

As a first generation college graduate for his family, Dr. Walczyk said he chose to teach at Western in 1995 largely because of its reputation for excellence in serving first generation college attendees such as himself.

He also said he expressed interest in helping to build Western’s fledgling music program, and as a result he was given the opportunity to help orchestrate program development. The chance to involve himself in the new program featuring modern music composition and jazz techniques was both challenging and intriguing.

Walczyk said, “I am not only training future musicians, I am training future teachers, future mentors, and future role models of our society who will pass on their passion to future generations.”

Speaking about the award itself Walczyk said “this is a very humbling honor, particularly when one considers the number of outstanding faculty on the WOU campus.”

Dr. Maureen Dolan: Professor of Sociology

Earning a Ph.D. in Sociology in 1993, Dr. Dolan specializes in Latin American studies, class analysis, state theory, and gender studies.

Having graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Maureen made her way to Western in the same year, and she began teaching a wide range of classes under her umbrella of specialties.

Many of these attribute back to her interest in Latin America, which stems from a study abroad opportunity in Chile taken during her own years as a student.

Being taught by exiled Brazilian scholars was just the start of an in-depth trip in the South American country. While there, Dr. Dolan immersed herself in the local customs and agriculture, collaborating with the Nicaraguan Ministry of Agriculture in regards to agrarian development.

In this case, agrarian development is a set of factors, including technological and economical, that may have an effect on agricultural practices.

In relation to the entire trip, Dolan said “it was important in my formation of an understanding of sociology as a discipline that is critical, public, and engaged in the practice of social justice.”

Today, Dr. Dolan lives in Salem with her family following the creation of a service-learning course known as the Latino Mentor Program in 1996. Through educational and community outreach like the mentor program, Latinos are helping areas in Oregon that are underserved.

This community movement can involve tutoring programs in schools locally, and now even internationally since the program has spread to Mexico, Nicaragua and Argentina. The groups working with the international segment of the program focus on incarcerated youth and even the LGBTQ community.

“It is also a great honor to work with WOU students who bring their energy and insight to the Latino Mentor Program,” Dolan said. “In the development and expansion of the program, I have listened to my students and followed their lead in identifying our involvement in community projects.”

Dolan said she considers the Pastega Award “a great honor to be recognized by the WOU community for developing a curriculum that links teaching, research and service in the Latino Mentor Program.”

Summary of Bills 1.15, 4.15, 6.15

In addition to the breakdown of ASWOU’s relationship with OSA and Oregon Senator’s Letter to the Editor, here is a summary of the amendments concerning ASWOU’s involvement with OSA:

 

Bill 1.15

Senate Bill 1.15 pertains to the operations of ASWOU and ASWOU senate, specifically the ASWOU president’s ability to use executive orders. Bill 1.15 would give the ASWOU president a broader scope in which to use executive orders, and it would modify the current standards for communication between the president and the senate when utilizing executive orders.

A vote of YES on Bill 1.15 would expand the ASWOU presidential power to use executive orders as explained above.

A vote of NO on Bill 1.15 would maintain current standards for use of executive orders by the ASWOU president.

Bill 4.15

Senate Referendum 4.15 asks the Western student body whether or not they want to maintain ties to the Oregon Student Association (OSA). OSA is a student-run organization that works with state legislators to increase the access to, and affordability of higher education in Oregon. Currently membership to OSA costs Western students a total of $28,839 per year, and the total will increase to $29,679 in the 2015-2016 academic year.

A vote of YES on Referendum 4.15 would end Western Oregon’s relationship with the Oregon Student Association.

A vote of NO on Referendum 4.15 would maintain Western Oregon’s relationship with the Oregon Student Association.

Bill 6.15

Senate Bill 6.15 proposes the creation of the ASWOU Representative Assembly. The ASWOU Representative Assembly would be a monthly gathering of student groups, clubs, and service departments (NonTrad, Veterans, etc.) to discuss issues and concerns around Western’s campus. These meetings are intended to address concerns of ASWOU interaction and representation of student groups and organizations.

A vote of YES on Bill 6.15 would create the ASWOU Representative Assembly.

A vote of NO on Bill 6.15 would maintain current ASWOU representation of student groups.

Fairy Tale Films on the Rise

By Emily Pate
 Freelancer

This spring, Disney released “Cinderella,” the latest in their live action fairy tale adaptions, following last year’s “Maleficent.” According to the International Business Times, these two films will soon be joined by similar adaptations, including Emma Thompson’s “The Beauty and the Beast,” as well as “Mulan,” “The Jungle Book,” and numerous others.

And why not, with how popular these new versions have been? In fact, the recent wave of fairy tale retellings has even been enough to catch “Saturday Night Live’s” attention, which refers to both “Maleficent” and “Cinderella” in their parody trailer of a live-action “Bambi” starring Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson.

Many of Disney’s most popular recent movies have been a retelling of fairy tales. “Frozen,” according to the Daily Mail, recently became the fifth highest grossing film of all time. The only four that have earned more are “Avatar,” “Titanic,” “The Avengers” and “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2.” This means that, of the five films that have made the most money globally, three are adaptations of preexisting stories.

“Frozen” is a new version of Hans Christian Anderson’s “The Snow Queen.” The Disney version of this story was then adapted to television in ABC’s “Once Upon a Time”; the Huffington Post reports there are currently stage and on-ice versions in the works. Disney has also recently released the film “Into the Woods,” an adaption of a play of the same name, which was – in turn – an adaptation of the many fairy tales that take part in its plot.

These films and TV shows are just a few of the fairy tale adaptations that can be found in recent media. There are also, among many others, the ongoing show “Grimm,” which presents a new view of the family most famous for recording fairy tales, and “Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters,” which transforms the classic story into an action film. The number of these new versions only seems to be rising.

As an adult watching the animated films of my childhood, I often wonder why the characters do what they do. What does Maleficent try so hard to hurt Sleeping Beauty? Why does Cinderella stay in a house where she is unhappy?

These new adaptations try to supply the answers, but what never changes is the fact that fairy tales are good stories. There are infinite ways to tell them – evident by the skyrocketing popularity of the genre, and as they shift for new mediums and audiences, I’m sure there will be even more versions in the future. I, for one, am hoping so.