Mount Hood

Wolves encourage their peers to vote in upcoming election

Bailey Thompson | News Editor

With elections coming up on Nov. 6, Western students have a limited window left where they can register to vote. The voter registration deadline for the state of Oregon is Oct. 16, meaning that students will need to act quickly if they want their voices heard in local government.

A few of the ways that students can register include being automatically registered at the DMV, filling out the registration form online, mailing a voter registration card and going to a local election office to fill the form out in person.

Oregon’s official voter registration website is https://sos.oregon.gov/voting. On this site, students can register to vote, view candidate information, find materials about the current election and, beginning Oct. 12, access the voters’ pamphlet.

If Western students would like on-campus assistance with their registration, the ASWOU executive staff will be tabling in the WUC until the deadline in order to answer questions they might have.

“If 50 percent of young folks (in Oregon) were to register, it would be the largest voting group to date,” said Oregon Students of Color Coalition Organizer Manuel Mejia Gonzalez, who has been helping ASWOU with their tabling.

“In 2016, we registered 49,000 students…They were all people from 15 different campuses here in the state.” said Gonzalez.

ASWOU Director of Equity Natalie Dean then affirmed how significant individual votes can be when it comes to the outcome of an election.

“100 votes can swing an election easily. The numbers don’t lie,” Dean said.

Finally, Dean empathized with students who may be hesitant to vote, but she encouraged them to look out for the support that it available to them.

“I understand why people are less inclined to want to go out and vote because, if you don’t know the process, it’s daunting,” Dean said. But she also hoped students would find it easier if they knew that their student government was willing to stand by them in saying “It’s not that bad. We can help you.”

 

Important Dates

Oct. 10-12, 2018 Voters Pamphlets delivered

Oct. 16, 2018 Voter registration deadline

Oct. 17-22, 2018 Ballots mailed

Nov. 6, 2018 Election Day

 

Contact the author at howlnews@wou.edu

Opinion: #WhyIDidntReport brings important conversation to light following Kavanaugh confirmation

Caity Healy | Editor-in-Chief

“‘How did you get home?’ ‘I don’t remember.’ ‘How’d you get there?’ ‘I don’t remember.’ ‘Where is the place?’ ‘I don’t remember.’ ‘How many years ago was it?’ ‘I don’t know.’”

These words were said on Oct. 2 by President Donald Trump, the supposed face of our nation, as he had the audacity to mock Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony given on Sept. 27. His remarks were met with a roaring crowd, applause and laughter.

Upon hearing his take on the situation, and the reaction of the crowd, I was disgusted — and I wasn’t alone in that. Even Brian Kilmeade of Fox News’s “Fox & Friends” stated, “Last night, he chose to blow it.”

On Oct. 6, following a rather short FBI investigation, Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed onto the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh, accused of sexual assault by Ford, was confirmed into a position that throughout history has had immense power over the laws and policies of the country. Someone who has been accused of sexual assault now has a say over what laws our country will follow.

This is a prime example of why people choose not to share their stories. An argument that several choose to use against Ford is, ‘why did you wait 36 years?’ Why she chose to wait is entirely her decision, one that she does not have to justify, and should not be used against her. But put yourself in her shoes: if your assaulter was about to confirmed into a position of high power, wouldn’t you want to speak up then too?

Why don’t people report their stories? Because when they do, they are mocked by the highest executive position in the country. Because when they do, they become hated by much of the country and even receive death threats. Because when they do, their accuser is still confirmed into the highest judicial position in the country.

In 2016, during Trump’s campaign, according to CNN, “at least 15 women accused Trump of misbehavior ranging from sexual harassment and sexual assault to lewd behavior around women.” Trump himself admitted that he has assaulted women, stating in 2005 that “…you can do anything … Grab them by the p****. You can do anything.”

Why don’t people report their stories? Because when they do, their accuser, despite their admittance to assault and despite the many who made allegations against them, still become the elected president of the United States.

Amidst the controversy surrounding the Kavanaugh allegation, many took to social media to use their voice under the hashtag, “#WhyIDidntReport.” Sharing stories that many struggle to ever make public, victims of sexual assault explained the reasons that they decided not to come forward. What that reason is differs for many, whether it be not having proof, feeling as if nobody would care or believe them, the fact that they were intoxicated when it happened, or for some, being convinced by others that it was not sexual assault. Whatever the reason, whether or not someone chooses to report is their own decision. If they decide to wait years, and then come forward, that is their decision as well. If they decide to never report it, that is their choice.

Recently, I reached out to a friend of mine who wished to remain anonymous, who has been a victim of two occurrences of sexual assault. She reported one, and chose not to report the other.

“I was confused — It was the guy I liked at the time, but it was obviously something I didn’t want. I didn’t know how to express (what happened). I blamed myself because he didn’t talk to me after that… I was more focused on if he still liked me or not,” stated anonymous source. This case happened in 2014, four years ago. Until recently, she had chosen not to tell anyone aside from close friends.

I didn’t even want to tell my counselor or therapist. I went through multiple (professionals),” the anonymous source said. “I really wanted to deny that it happened for some f****** reason. I just didn’t want to tell anybody.”

In early 2018, the anonymous source was assaulted again. This time, she decided that she wanted to report it.

“I reported him. But even then I called (to check on the case) twice a week for a whole month and I was always being redirected. I still haven’t heard from them yet. I kind of just… gave up. I felt like the sheriff department did not give a f***, they didn’t know what to do with that information. I still haven’t gotten justice,” the anonymous source commented.

This is just another example of why some choose not to report. It’s ultimately their choice. However, my anonymous source wanted to make it clear that while she didn’t feel like she received justice in her case, she wants people to know that they “shouldn’t be afraid to speak up. Whatever you’re stowing away inside or carrying, for me, telling someone really helps. I don’t feel that much trauma from the (case) that happened most recently because I talked about it several hours after it happened. But I feel like, whatever I’m carrying from the previous one, it’s full of shame and guilt and even if I (reported) I still have to carry around the four years I have not spoken about it.”

Know that for anyone who wants someone to talk to, or just wants someone to believe them, there are resources here on campus. Abby’s House, located in Room 106 of the WUC, is a center where anyone can go and share their story where they will be believed. They can also be contacted through phone at 503-838-8219.

 

Contact the author at chealy16@wou.edu

Brett Kavanaugh confirmed to the Supreme Court

Bailey Thompson | News Editor

The American people were subjected to months of controversy when President Donald Trump, on July 9, chose Brett Kavanaugh as his nominee for Supreme Court Justice.

Kavanaugh has been involved in the political realm for a number of years. According to Business Insider, his presence at key events in political history effectively earned him the nickname “the Forrest Gump of Republican Politics.”

In his younger years, Kavanaugh held positions as law clerk to Justice Anthony Kennedy and as associate counsel on the team who investigated former President Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky. After that, he worked as assistant, staff secretary and senior associate counsel to former President George W. Bush.

Since 2006, Kavanaugh has served on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.

Although his political background was the motivating factor for his nomination, alleged elements of Kavanaugh’s past have shocked and horrified much of the American public.

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, Deborah Ramirez, and Julie Swetnick have each come forward with sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh since his nomination.

On Sept. 27, Ford testified at a hearing, stating she was “100 percent” certain that Kavanaugh was the man who had attacked her 36 years prior.

Ford’s testimony inspired an FBI investigation, postponing the senate’s confirmation vote until further knowledge had been obtained.

The hearing also incited an outcry of sentiments online — with conflicting hashtags such as #StopKavanaugh, #ConfirmKavanaugh and #Ibelievesurvivors highlighted the passion of those on both sides of the issue.

Concluding the investigation, the FBI reported they did not find any evidence to corroborate the allegations against Kavanaugh. So, on Oct. 6, the Senate voted 50-48 to confirm him to the Supreme Court, establishing what is anticipated to be a conservative majority for many years to come.

The outcome of this vote will prove significant to Western students for a couple of different reasons. First, the addition of Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court suggests that the interpretation of highly-contested laws will have a more conservative influence in the future. On top of that, the way that these hearings addressed individuals who brought forward sexual assault allegations may spur a national conversation about the way that the justice system treats survivors.

Ultimately, the controversy of the decision stemmed from one foundational question: who has the onus of proof in such a situation? Should Kavanaugh have needed to prove his innocence, or was it up to Ford to verify his guilt?

Although legal proceedings have traditionally operated under the presumption of innocence, defined by Oxford English Dictionary as “the fundamental principle and legal requirement that a defendant must be presumed innocent, and treated as such, until proven guilty,” it can be difficult to provide convicting evidence for many sexual assault cases, particularly when time has elapsed since the event.

“There’s inappropriate questions to ask someone about gender/race violence and one of them is ‘why did you wait so long?’” said Director of Abby’s House Aislinn Addington. “It’s so much more complicated than that.”

Speaking on the ways that Kavanaugh’s confirmation will affect Western students, she said that, “there’s a lot of weight surrounding this appointment, and so then that’s on the shoulders of survivors in a way that it shouldn’t be.”

“Start with supporting each other,” Addington said when asked how students can help survivors in their community. “Come to Abby’s House. We have peer advocates who are trained to help and listen… And that’s a great place to start.”

For those who would like to connect with Abby’s House for support, they can be reached at (503) 838-8219 or visit them in lower level of the WUC. Students can also reach the Student Health and Counseling Center at (503) 838-8313 or Sable House in Dallas at (503) 623-6703.

 

Contact the author at howlnews@wou.edu

The reality of gym dress-codes

Caity Healy | Editor-in-Chief

Recently, I went back to the Health and Wellness Center for the first time since summer had ended. I was incredibly happy that it was finally open and I was excited to get back into a fitness routine, so I dressed in my favorite, most comfortable workout tank top — one that I had worn to this same location numerous times.

Mid-workout, I noticed an employee staring at me across the gym. I didn’t really think anything of it. However, at the end of my workout when I was stretching, he approached me and told me that what I was wearing was against dress-code.

At first, I was taken aback; I was wearing a tank top, leggings, and close-toed shoes, all of which seem normal for a gym. However, he then explained that my tank top specifically was against code as it means I could spread sweat more easily, and potentially spread disease.

Let me make myself clear, I am in full support of keeping students healthy and preventing the spread of disease. In this case, though, I felt as if this was something aimed more towards stopping students from dressing a certain way than towards stopping the spread of disease. Not once in my time here have I been told I’m breaking dress code while wearing a T-shirt but being sweaty. I have been to the gym multiple times with my boyfriend as he literally drips sweat from his clothing, and not one employee has even stared at him. Why me? It’s as if they only care about preventing a hypothetical spread of disease than doing something about the actual people drenched in sweat all around me.

On another note, aren’t you supposed to sweat at the gym? Isn’t that the point of the sanitizer and towels? When it comes down to it, if you sweat, at the place meant to get you sweaty, just clean it up.  

I’m not the only student who has been bothered by this new policy enforcement. Junior ASL/English Interpreting major Kaitlyn Allen was dress-coded for wearing a wide-strap tank top. In her opinion, this new code simply “is not reasonable. It will cause people to wear something they are really not comfortable working out in or it may potentially discourage people from going to the gym on campus.”

Overall, I’m not enraged at the employees or the policies of the Health and Wellness Center for dress-coding me. I appreciate that they are trying to keep their facilities as clean and disease-free as possible. My only request is that if you are going to dress-code me for wearing something that exposes more skin that could potentially get sweaty, then please just dress-code the ones who are also coated in sweat. Just keep it fair. Otherwise, I end up feeling singled out and awkward when I’m approached and stopped mid-workout to get a lecture from an employee, when in reality, there are other people they probably should be focusing more heavily on.

 

Contact the author at chealy16@wou.edu

Photo courtesy of Paul F. Davis

Nike under heavy fire

Lake Larsen | Sports Editor

The athletic apparel company Nike took a bold move on Sept. 4, by making controversial athlete Colin Kaepernick the face of the 30th anniversary of their “Just Do It” campaign. Following Kaepernick’s protest of the unfair treatment of minorities by kneeling for the national anthem, many saw Nike’s move as being anti-police, or anti-America. Because of this many, people took to Twitter, posting pictures and videos burning their Nike shoes and swearing to switch to using other athletic brands. These actions displayed that they would rather destroy their belongings than continue to support a company that does not align with their political beliefs. But where do they turn now?

If you choose to protest Nike’s stance by banishing your Jordans to a bonfire, what company will you choose to switch to? If the political stance of a company is so important to you that you will destroy the belongings that bear their name, whose name will you support?

The first thought you may have is to switch to one of Nike’s largest competitors, Adidas. Let’s think about the political history of Adidas. According to “Golden Kicks: The Shoes that Changed Sports”, it was founded in Germany in 1949 by Adolf Dassler. 16 years prior to founding Adidas, Dassler joined the National Socialist Party, also known as the Nazi party. So maybe choosing a shoe company that provided shoes to Hitler Youth isn’t the best new stance to align with.

The next company one might look to is Under Armour. Looking back into their past, Kevin Plank, the CEO of Under Armour, has come out and publicly endorsed Donald Trump after his controversial Muslim travel ban. This prompted a backlash from major sponsored athletes of Under Armour. According to the washingtonpost.com, Stephen Curry, Dwayne Johnson, and Misty Copeland all came out against Plank. These actions have resulted in dips in their sales, proving that aligning yourself with a divisive president isn’t the best political move.

The last major shoe brand one might switch to is Puma. However, Puma faces a familiar issue. Adolf Dassler, founder of Adidas and a member of the Nazi party, had a brother, Rudolf Dassler. Rudolf Dassler found success in the shoe business like his brother, and just like Adolf, he joined the Nazi party (“Golden Kicks.”) Meaning, Puma was founded by a Nazi just like Adidas.

But what if I told you there was a company founded in America by not one, but two veterans of the US Army? Men that built a brand from selling shoes from the back of their car? Based on alumni.stanford.edu, that company is Nike. The same company people deem “anti-military” was founded by veterans.

If you want to take the nationalist route of whining about a company supporting a person kneeling for their flag because it doesn’t stand for them, maybe look to who you’ll be supporting next. If Nike is a burden to their choices of endorsing Kaepernick, then Puma, Adidas and Under Armour are a burden to the political beliefs of their founders and CEOs. But in the end, buying and wearing shoes doesn’t represent your beliefs. Whining about it does.

 

Contact the author at llarsen13@wou.edu

Photo courtesy of nike.com

New music releases

Chrys Weedon | Entertainment Editor

October 5:

Photo courtesy of mollyburch.bandcamp.com

  • Molly Burch: First Flower
    Over a year since her first album, “Please Be Mine,” Molly Burch will be releasing her sophomore album. “First Flower” is said to comment on the artist’s struggle with anxiety and broken friendships.

Photo courtesy of twentyonepilots.com

  • Twenty One Pilots: Trench
    After a year long hiatus, TOP has been alluding to the release of their fifth album since July when they released two singles. This will be their first album in the three years since “Blurryface.”

Photo courtesy of tokyopoliceclub.com

  • Tokyo Police Club: TPC
    “Hercules,” a track on the album, is available for listening now. This new track listens like a light, summer jam that will surely carry them on a wave of nostalgia through the fall.

October 12:

Photo courtesy of youngthegiant.com

  • Young the Giant: Mirror Master
    An album about shattering stereotypes and blazing our own trails, this will be the fourth studio album from this band, and is sure to satisfy Young the Giant’s fanbase.

Photo courtesy of tomodell.com

  • Tom Odell: Jubilee Road
    This album was recorded by Odell while living on a quiet street in East London, and promises to be his most honest album. The catchy piano melodies and passionate performances of his previous album “Long Way Down” are promised to return in this new project.

October 26:

Photo courtesy of robyn.com

  • Robyn: Honey
    Robyn is returning with her first studio album since “Body Talk” in 2010. This new album boasts a new emotional transparency and softness that contrasts with the party songs featured on her last album.

November 9:

Photo courtesy of universalmusic.com

  • Jeff Goldblum: The Capitol Studios Sessions
    That’s right, Jeff Goldblum is releasing an album. An accomplished jazz pianist, Goldblum’s debut album stars The Mildred Snitzer Orchestra (and Jeff on the piano) playing at the Capitol’s Studio A and B, which they turned into a dinner club to capture the music in front of a live audience.

Photo courtesy of muse.com

  • Muse: Simulation Theory
    “Simulation Theory” is a science-fiction themed conceptual album inspired by 1980s pop culture. In their eighth studio album, Muse blends nostalgia with contemporary themes to create something unlike they’ve ever done before.

November 16:

Photo courtesy of mumfordandsons.com

  • Mumford and Sons: Delta
    “Delta” promises a journey back into Mumford and Sons acoustic roots, but also ushers in innovation. This album also incorporates genres such as jazz, electronica, and rap.

November 30:

Photo courtesy of the1975.com

  • The 1975: A Brief Inquiry Into Online Relationships

Two years after their last album, The 1975 returns with their third LP. The cover and tracklist have already been released, and if the song titles tell us anything, it’s that this album will be done in the band’s classic, indie-pop style.

 

Contact the author at howlentertainment@wou.edu

Ensuring diversity in the arts

Chrys Weedon | Entertainment Editor

Often, liberal arts colleges and universities are privileged environments; when it comes to the creative atmosphere they foster, they can promote critical discussions on important topics, and allow traditionally underrepresented voices to be heard and appreciated. Continuing this trend can be quite difficult as our generation transitions into the “real world” — a world in which white, male, cisgender voices are often still held up as the standard.

Americansforthearts.org states on their website, “We must all hold ourselves accountable, because acknowledging and challenging our inequities and working in partnership is how we will make change happen.” Holding ourselves accountable can start by analysing the kinds of art we ingest. People should go through the music they have on their phone or computer. How many straight white males’ music is downloaded? The same should be considered with literature and art collections. What types of perspectives dominate?

“I believe students need to see people like them doing the things that they want to do,” commented art professor Paula Booth in regards to the way diversity can be reflected through this creative outlet. Representation through this medium is a way to help all students feel included, and to give a voice to the underrepresented.

Booth goes on to add that “people need to understand that art is not just something that was made by white men a couple hundred years ago, which is often what we’re taught.” To get a deeper comprehension of this concept, students can benefit from being mindful about what they choose to expose themselves to, especially when it goes against what they might have been taught growing up.

“When we’re exposed to other people’s cultures… we become more compassionate, we have greater empathy, we express our curiosity,” stated Catherine Ndungo-Case, the founder of the Cheza Nami organization. According to chezanami.org, the goal of this organization is to “promote cultural education and diversity awareness.”

Of course, being perfect is not the goal here. Rather, the goal in ensuring diversity in the arts is to become more well-rounded individuals and to give a platform to the underrepresented. This can be achieved by looking at the literature, the art, the theater, and the visual content absorbed by most on a daily basis — by making an effort to surround ourselves with perspectives that aren’t our default.

 

Contact the author at howlentertainment@wou.edu

Photo courtesy of Paul F. Davis