Mount Hood

Free-bleeding in the UK

By: Katrina Penaflor Managing Editor

The United Kingdom has renewed their tax on tampons, keeping them marked as a “luxury item” after a recent vote on Oct. 26, 2015.

The result of the remaining tax, which is 5 percent, has led to women free-bleeding outside of British Parliament in an effort to protest.

Free-bleeding is the forgoing of feminine hygiene products while menstruating, to show the visual results of a period without tampons, pads, or the alternatives.

One of the protestors, a woman named Charlie Edge, recounted her feelings in a Facebook post: “People are so quick to tell people that the tampon tax is something we shouldn’t be upset about […] But then they get upset when I show them the reality of the necessity of sanitary items.”

Edge also went on to write about the negative backlash she and fellow protestors received from free-bleeding.

“We’re getting lots of dirty looks and someone just shouted at us to get a job,” Edge wrote, adding “Taxes are necessary, I get it. So are tampons/pads.”

The argument behind the protestors is that feminine products should be viewed as essential items to a woman’s health and sanitation, and should not be taxed as a “luxury item.”

This is especially important when there are women who struggle to afford tampons in the first place; the additional tax only adds to the issue.

British Labour M.P. Stella Creasy spoke to Parliament about how the tax shows inequality among society, and it fails to take into consideration the necessary hygiene products a woman can need.

“Tampons and sanitary towels, even I’m struggling with the words tonight it seems, have always been considered a luxury. That isn’t by accident, that’s by design of an unequal society, in which the concerns of women are not treated as equally as the concerns of men,” Creasy said.

UK comedian Russell Howard addressed the absurdities he saw with the “luxury” marking, calling to attention a number of items that are not taxed and considered by Parliament to be more essential than tampons.

“Well here is a list of some of the things that the taxman thinks is essential more than tampons: helicopters, bingo, Twiglets, adult nappies, flapjacks, toffee apples, edible cake decorations, a ticket to the zoo and crocodile meat,” Howard said on his talk show.

The protestors hope the free-bleeding will raise enough attention to the topic of menstruation and what should and should not be considered a luxury item.

Edge went on to tell Buzzfeed, “If people are grossed out by me not wearing a tampon then I think that emphasizes my point […] They’re not ‘luxury items.’”

Thanksgiving food drive seeking donations

By: Jamal Smith 
Sports Editor

As you feast with your family and friends this Thanksgiving, it is important to “give thanks,” but also to think about people that are less fortunate.

According to a 2013 U.S. Department of Agriculture report, 14.3 percent of U.S. households were food insecure.

Also according to the report, 17.5 million households “had difficulty at some time during the year providing enough food for all of their family members due to a lack of resources.”

According to the same USDA report, Oregon’s 15 percent food insecurity rate is even higher than the national average, and the statistics have been climbing over the past three years.

With the Thanksgiving food drive, Western Oregon University is giving you the opportunity to help families in Monmouth and Independence who don’t have the luxury to afford an extravagant Thanksgiving meal.

Any Thanksgiving food items are accepted, such as stuffing, mashed potatoes, gravy, veggies, cranberry sauce and any other food item; excluding the turkey or any refrigerated or frozen items.

The Thanksgiving food drive is coordinated by the WOU Food Pantry, whose mission statement is “to reduce the dilemma of food insecurity on campus.”

Donations can be dropped off at the WOU Food Pantry located on the second floor of the ASPC building or in a bin located in the front office of the ASPC building.

The WOU Food Pantry accepts donations year round. If you are interested in volunteering for the WOU Food Pantry contact the ASWOU Director of Internal Affairs, at aswou@wou.edu for more information.

Rank your school: do college rankings really matter?

By:Alvin Wilson 
Staff Writer

“Top 100 colleges in the U.S.! Click here to see where yours ranks!”

Odds are, if you browse the internet or use any social media, you have seen a headline like this. But how much help do they really offer? Does the rank of your college really matter?

Well, not really.

An economics paper written by Stacy Dale and Alan Krueger suggests that the college you attend really doesn’t matter when determining how much money you will make after graduation.

In their study, Dale and Krueger found that students who graduated from extremely selective colleges didn’t make more money than students who were accepted to the same college but chose to attend a less selective one.

What does this mean for you? It means that if you work hard and are intelligent enough to be accepted into an Ivy League school, you will likely be successful and make a lot of money regardless of where you graduate.

The college you attend doesn’t dictate how much money you will make.

Harvard is often at the top of the list when it comes to high-earning students. But does this mean that Harvard educates its students differently than a public university? Or does it simply mean the school is more selective, limiting its students to those who would have been successful regardless?

Organizations that rank colleges in the U.S. use methods that determine how much money a student who graduates from that college is expected to make. This can be problematic for many obvious reasons.

So how should we be ranking our colleges?

An article published recently in The Economist tries to answer that question.

The Economist used information provided by America’s Department of Education to put together a scoreboard for colleges and universities — one that they believe more accurately reflects how helpful a university is to its students.

They analyzed the financial aid information of hundreds of thousands of students from 1,275 institutions to determine the financial situation of students before they graduated.

They also analyzed their tax returns submitted after graduation and compared the expected earnings of a graduate with their actual median earnings.

For a college to rank highly on this scoring system, its students have to make more than the expected earnings of a graduate from that school. This method of ranking colleges is a much more accurate reflection of the actual value students get from their degrees.

There are, however, some problems with the rankings. The data only includes students who applied for financial aid, which excludes the children of wealthy parents. The information also only provides tax return information for the first ten years after graduation, so it doesn’t account for people who start high-paying jobs after more schooling or experience in the workforce.

It is also important to consider the type of student each college attracts. A college’s ranking could be negatively affected if, for example, it is a school for the deaf or blind.

Even though the scoring criteria provided by The Economist is a more accurate representation of how much a college helps its students upon graduation, students should still take its information lightly.

There are countless factors that can contribute to a college’s ranking.

To see where Western, or your future graduate school, ranks in The Economist’s scoreboard, visit their article here.

The Forgotten

By: Megan Clark 
Campus Life Editor

On the heels of Veteran’s Day on Nov. 11, 2015, Virginia became the first state in the United States able to help all of its 1,400 homeless veterans find permanent housing. The veterans made up just nine percent of the homeless population in Virginia.

American society has, in varying degrees of success, made strides in addressing inequities; on June 26th, 2015, gay marriage was made legal nationwide.

Protests and riots have taken place in the streets of major cities for unlawful killings of African American men. The wage gap between genders in the workplace and women’s reproductive rights are hot button topics in politics.

These issues are not resolved or forgotten in average Americans’ minds, and with good reason, they shouldn’t be. But where does homelessness stand on their list of concerns?
Homelessness doesn’t discriminate between race, gender, or religion, and is a widespread issue that affects every community in the world.

According to the National Student Campaign Against Hunger and Homelessness: “In the U.S., more than 3.5 million people experience homelessness each year.”

As the weather gets colder and holidays near, homelessness becomes a lukewarm topic of discussion.

Food drives and donation sites requesting warm weather gear appear on the everyman’s radar, yet it’s not enough to force people to address the problem and its possible solutions directly.

Confronting everyday images of people sleeping under bridges or lined up at missions isn’t enough to invoke a passion for change; instead, homeless people are ignored, harassed, or avoided.

Why is homelessness greeted with such apathy or disgust?

Many view homelessness as a result of being lazy; however, according to HomeAid, homelessness is “caused by tragic life occurrences like the loss of loved ones, job loss, domestic violence, divorce and family disputes.”

Other reasons include “depression, untreated mental illness, post traumatic stress disorder, and physical disabilities,” according to HomeAid.

While there is no umbrella approach to addressing the varied issues that cause homelessness, the best way to solve homelessness is keeping an individual in their home. Prevention is the most effective way to keep people off the streets and out of temporary shelters, and also ultimately costs less.

Home-loss can be prevented in a variety of ways. One method, according to the Coalition for the Homeless, is through “effective discharge planning,” which would include housing assistance for those with mental illnesses or those leaving foster care.

While donations and volunteering are excellent ways to aid the homeless population, they won’t remedy flaws in the system, and certainly won’t keep people in homes.

This means the public should look at addressing prevention, not merely trying to stanch the wound with donated mittens and unwanted cans of Campbell’s soup.

“Toy Story” Turns 20

By: Declan Hertel 
Entertainment Editor

We all know you’ve got to grow old, but growing up is dumb and you shouldn’t do it.

One school of thought would be perturbed by finding out that “Toy Story,” Pixar Animation’s first feature-length film, turns 20 years old on Nov. 22. But I think that the upcoming anniversary is a perfect opportunity to rewatch it for the zillionth time, and revel once more in what is both one of the best pieces of animation in history, and an indelible part of this generation’s childhood.

A solid percentage of my childhood memorabilia is “Toy Story” related. I still have all my Woody and Buzz Lightyear dolls and action figures, and every year the first item I put on the Christmas tree is a Sheriff Woody ornament.

One of my best friends has Woody and Buzz shoes and a big poster of the alien toys on her bedroom wall, and I have met a great many people with similar stories. “Toy Story” is a big deal for a lot of people.

But why? Why does this tale of talking toys still resonate so deeply with the babies of the mid-nineties?

Maybe because we had it while our brains were in their earliest stages of development, and it is thus etched into them. Maybe because after all the amazing technological advancements of the past few years, “Toy Story” still looks freaking fantastic.

Both of those things apply, but I think it has endured for another reason, one that I talked about in regards to Smashing Pumpkins’ “Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness” some time ago: it speaks to you in different, powerful ways depending on/no matter how old you are.

As a child, I watched it with glee, and imagined my own toys coming to life and having adventures. During my adolescence, I watched it and saw memories of a simpler, more imaginative time. Now as a twenty-something, I watch it and appreciate how honest and heartfelt the movie is.

My parents watch it and appreciate that a piece of children’s entertainment is so sophisticated and enjoyable to adults (not to mention the “growing up” theme of the later installments: my mother and I both openly wept during “Toy Story 3”).

I will always welcome Toy Story’s anniversaries: it’s another excuse to see what else it holds for the new phase of my life I find myself in. And now I’m going to watch it again.

History, Hip Hop, and Hamilton.

By: Jenna Beresheim 
News Editor

As someone who has personally struggled with learning history my entire life, I am constantly craving a learning source that tricks me into learning about new topics.

My childhood consisted of mnemonics, Wishbone the dog, and hours of Schoolhouse Rock. I even faintly recall The Animaniacs doing a few shows on states and presidents.

Names, dates, and locations have always been something I had to fully submerge my brain for any hopes I would retain an ounce of that information.

I was always that student in class that hummed a song or had some weird mental recollection tool to pull out of my pocket when the scantrons came out.

That is exactly the preconditioning that led me to latch onto the idea of a Broadway Musical featuring our Founding Fathers performing rap battles in an all-American, rags-to-riches story.

“Hamilton” puts Alexander Hamilton in the spotlight as a young twenty-something on his way up in the blossoming American government.

Other key figures that come into play are Aaron Burr, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Marquis de Lafayette, King George, and many more. Look at that, proof that I’m already recalling all of these key political figures.

The musical boasts over 46 tracks broken into two separate acts.

Through those 46 songs, Hamilton’s life is re-lived and history is told in a fascinating, enchanting way. Important dates, locations, events, and people are all laced in so seamlessly so as to educate the listener subconsciously.

The songs themselves accurately represent their characters as well – George Washington speaks in polished prose, while Lafayette sports a thick French accent.

This gives the characters more depth, and creates a relatable connection for all of them, even the characters you love to hate.

“Hamilton” debuted in February this year, where it sold out. Broadway quickly swooped in to host the musical on Aug. 6 2015, with multiple critical acclaims following shortly afterward.

The off-Broadway productions have even scored many awards, such as the Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Musical, along with seven other Drama Desk Awards out of 14 total nominations.

It is even rumored that the Broadway production is in the running for a 2016 Tony Award.

If that doesn’t speak for the musical enough, then listen to this: the entire soundtrack is free to enjoy on Spotify. So try it out for yourself without the big Broadway box office prices.

Now that may not seem like much – it’s a play for a reason, obviously.

But I have never experienced a musical that so accurately portrayed entire scenes within just the music itself. While listening, you’re dropped into war scenes, cabinet meetings in the form of vicious rap battles, and even countdowns to duels between two foes beyond compromise.

While I would fully encourage anyone to see “Hamilton” in its intended format for full immersion, I can attest to an experience just as fulfilling through the soundtrack alone.

And if you’re like me, you won’t be able to stop talking about it – or listening to it, for that matter – until everyone around you also has it memorized whether they like it or not.

4 out of 4 Paws

How I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb

By: Jack Armstrong 
Copy Editor

I wanted to start this review off in an honest manner by letting you, the reader, know up front that I am a huge Bethesda fan. I love “Doom,” “Wolfenstein” (yes, even the reboot), “Fallout,” and “The Elder Scrolls.”

So you can imagine how I felt picking up “Fallout 4” last Tuesday, Nov. 10. I was ecstatic to have another entry in my favorite variety of Bethesda brand, open world, first-person RPG goodness.

Of course, my excitement was tempered. Could the team who had brought me “Fallout 3” and Skyrim really suck me back into giving away 300 plus hours of my life?
I’m happy to report that they have done it again.

“Fallout 4” takes place in Boston, and in a welcome shift, the player actually starts in a pre-nuclear war suburb called Sanctuary Hills. After designing your protagonist, you are greeted by a Vault-Tec salesman who enrolls you and your family in the nearest nuclear safe vault.

As luck would have it, no sooner does your pen touch the contract than the alarm sounds, the missiles have launched, and war is upon you. You successfully rush to your vault with your family, but all is not what it seems. This is when your story begins.

The movement and player interactions feel comfortable and familiar, but if you didn’t like the way either “Fallout: New Vegas” or “Skyrim” played, don’t expect any vast deviation in the overall approach.

The controls are virtually unchanged, but the upgrades to the heads-up display and the quick weapon switch system are welcome.

The graphics have been at the center of discussion surrounding the game, but it looks like these worries were unfounded. Despite the slower frame rate, the console edition looks great and, most importantly, a huge step up from “New Vegas.”

Your trusty Pip-Boy is back in action, and the S.P.E.C.I.A.L. stats system returns as the primary method of determining play style.

With no level cap to limit progress, you could conceivably max out all the skills, but it still pays to focus on how you want to play the game.

Do you feel like Mad Max, like you want to tear up the wasteland with your bare hands, upgrade Strength, Endurance, and Agility to hit harder and take more punishment? Feeling more of a Han Solo vibe like you’d rather charm your way around? Charisma, Perception, Intelligence, and Luck are your tools.

Of course, combat plays a huge role, and “Fallout 4” has refined the Bethesda recipe with an emphasis on realism.

The Vault-Tec Assisted Targeting System makes a return but rather than pausing the combat completely it just slows combat. So while you have extra time to target, your foes have extra time as well.

The combat really showcases the new customization system for weapons, by far one of the best new additions. Bits of junk collected around the wasteland can now be broken down into components and crafted into weapon modifications.

Channel your inner MacGyver and use the glass from an empty Nuka Cola bottle, the crystal and screws from a discarded watch, and a touch of nuclear material to create a glowing dot reflex sight for that handy shotgun.

The possibilities are numerous for all guns and melee weapons, and the more skills you unlock on your S.P.E.C.I.A.L tree, the more upgrades you can create and unleash.

The other big addition is a new companion, this time in the form of a dog. Shortly after beginning your journey, you come across a dog who can be recruited to follow you on your adventures. Even though you don’t get to name him, you can customize his appearance with armor and other accessories you pick up along the way.

Companions are plentiful, and actually extremely helpful, which is a nice change of pace from other Bethesda games.

Not only can they carry supplies, but they are easily given orders, and once you set up a base, they can be told to wait at a base until you need them.

You will need friends to ensure your survival out in the post-apocalyptic wasteland. The map is huge. I’ve already logged close to 24 hours in the game and I’ve only managed to explore about a third of its total spread.

While much of the scenery is colored in a similar palate, different areas all have a distinct feel. Which is helpful when you’re trying to get your bearings.

There are a few complaints.

When I first ventured out into the wasteland, I was overwhelmed, and the learning curve went from nothing, to having to do all the things too quickly. Realistic? Yes. Frustrating? Absolutely.

The default control scheme was just different enough from previous entries that I was confused, but a quick shift in the menus and I was able to play my preferred control scheme from “Fallout 3.”

Finally, the system of building both in settlements and at crafting stations is difficult and not explained very well, if at all.

It took me a lot of trial and error to figure out how to negotiate all the menus and control nuances involved in building and customizing, and I have played “The Elder Scrolls” and “Fallout” a lot. I also encountered the most glitches when trying to build structures in my settlements.

This felt the most unpolished of all the in-game experiences.

Overall, I had high expectations for this edition of “Fallout,” and it continues to exceed every one of them.

If you are a fan of Bethesda, the open-world genre, RPG, first-person shooters, or really just a fan of video games in general, I highly recommend you pick this title up as soon as you can.

3.75 out of 4 paws.