Mount Hood

“Three Billboards” wins big at the BAFTAs

Zoë Strickland | Editor-in-Chief

The British Academy of Film and Television Arts held their annual award ceremony on Feb. 18.

According to the BAFTA’s website, the organization hopes to, “bring the very best work in film, games and television to public attention, and support the growth of creative talent in the UK and internationally.”

The most recognized film of the night was by far “Three Billboards Outside of Ebbing, Missouri.” The film, which originally hit theaters in the United States on Nov. 10, took home five of the nine awards it was nominated for most notably, Best Film and Most Outstanding British Film. “Three Billboards” also took home Best Actress, which was awarded to Frances McDormand for her role as Mildred Hayes and Supporting Actor, which was given to Sam Rockwell for his role as Jason Dixon.

“Blade Runner 2049” and “Darkest Hour” were tied for the second most awards received, both being awarded two of the eight they were nominated for. “Blade Runner 2049” won awards for cinematography and best visual effects. “Darkest Hour” also took home two BAFTA awards. Gary Oldman won Leading Actor for his role as Winston Churchill, and the film was awarded best Makeup and Hair undoubtedly because of the impressive job done with transforming Oldman into Churchill.

“Get Out” actor Daniel Kaluuya was awarded the EE Rising Star Award, which is the only award that the public votes on. According to the BAFTA website, the award “honours a young actor or actress who has demonstrated exceptional talent and ambition and has begun to capture the imagination of the British public.” More recently, Kaluuya also starred as W’Kabi in “Black Panther.”

Other take-homes for the night included “Coco” for Animated Film and “Baby Driver” for Editing.

The next big award show to hit the screens will be on March 4, when the 90th Academy Awards, hosted by Jimmy Kimmel, heads to Hollywood. The Oscars will cap off award season until it reopens with the People’s Choice Awards in September.

Contact the author at journaleditor@wou.edu

Photo by: Latimes.com

Taxation is not theft

Lake Larsen | Digital Media Manager

It’s getting to be that time of the year again, everyone’s least favorite season: tax season. As your W-2s, 1099Ts and all sorts of other forms with seemingly random letters and numbers come in the mail, you might find yourself asking, “Why do I even need to pay taxes?” After all, you earned the money already now the government is going to take it from you? Some people are so adamant about keeping their money that they adopt the slogan of “taxation is theft.” But in reality, this couldn’t be further from the truth.

The simple notion that taxing citizens is thievery from the government is commonly perpetuated by individuals who not only don’t understand what taxes are but also what taxes pay for.

So what is a tax? In its simplest form, a tax can be thought of as a fee you have to pay to the government. The most common form of taxes you’ll see is income tax. Based on variables ranging from your filing status to how big the check is, you’ll have different amounts taken out. And these taxes pay for a large variety of things that are vital to the existence of a first world country.

So now that you know what a tax is, it’s time to learn why taxes are actually a good thing. Do you enjoy driving on roads? How about going to a public school? Are you a fan of hospitals? All of these things in one way or another are paid for by federal and state tax dollars. The money that is taken from your check pays for the police officers and firefighters keeping you safe, the teachers that helped you learn how to read and write, and if you ever get down on your luck, your tax dollars fund the social safety nets that will get you back on your feet.

It’s important to note that taxation isn’t designed to break the bank. What you make in a year isn’t the amount you get taxed on. If you have children or are married, that lowers your tax burden. If you pay back some of your student loans or are forced to drive around a lot for work, that also helps lower your taxable income. Moreover, if you buy a hybrid car then that also helps lower your income. There are countless ways the government helps to lower the amount you have to pay. But at the end of the day, it’s still important that you pay the taxes you are asked.

The most common argument about getting rid of taxes or implementing major tax cuts is the idea of privatizing sections of the government we pay taxes to. While this can lead to cheaper costs for consumers, it doesn’t always work. In the instance of space travel, privatization has led to SpaceX being able to develop a rocket for fractions of the cost of what NASA has been able to do. However, when the tax funded NASA sends rockets to space, it’s with the intent of conducting various experiments. Meanwhile, privately funded SpaceX sends rockets to space with the intent of making a profit off cheaper rockets.

However, privatizing schools has resulted in charter schools that have some of the lowest literacy and mathematics levels in the country. On top of this there are some sectors that no business would ever want to make private, like paving and maintaining roads for free for the use of everyone because there is no monetary incentive. Based off changes we’ve already seen, giving tax cuts in exchange for privatizing sectors of the government will only result in unhappy citizens with fractions of what used to be available to them.

Taxes are a vital and irreplaceable part of living in a first world country. They take money from all citizens and use it for the betterment of the country as a whole. Thinking that taxation is theft means you either don’t fully comprehend what taxes are or you refuse to indorse the basis of what a first world country is. So instead of seeing the government as taking your money, try to think of all the good your dollars do for everyone.

Contact the author at llarsen13@wou.edu

Photo by: oneohionow.org

Getting creative with your dates

Caity Healy | Lifestyle Editor

Valentine’s Day, the one day a year where the main focus is simply “love.” While for some, it means spending a day with that special someone and displaying your affection and passion for them through countless romantic gestures. For others, it means finding yourself on a date with someone you barely know, taking a leap of faith in the name of love simply for the fact that they are your “valentine” of the day. But when it comes down to it, however you choose to spend the day, one thing remains true: it does not have to involve spending a lot of money.

Taking somebody out on a date, or even taking yourself on a date doesn’t have to mean spending your savings on the night. There are plenty of other ways you can spend the day that will mean just as much; you just have to get creative.

An easy go-to for many when it comes to going out on a date is something that most everyone loves: food. But taking someone out for a bite can still be just as special without breaking the bank. There are other options than high-end restaurants. Think about a food that might be special to you and your date specifically. Maybe you bonded over a milkshake somewhere; take them back to that spot and replay that date. Perhaps you know they’ve wanted to try a restaurant out for awhile. Use this day as an opportunity to go try it out.

Both of these will mean a lot more than taking your date to a random restaurant that has absolutely no meaning. But also, don’t be afraid to change it up. If you and your partner visit the same places frequently, I can almost guarantee they will appreciate something new.

If you want to win some bonus points, you can also cook for your date. A well-made, home-cooked meal isn’t something that many college students get to enjoy often. Your date will recognize the hard-work and effort that went into the planning, cooking and presentation of the meal. To kick it up a notch, set up the table with a candle and tell them to dress nicely to make it feel like you’re at a five-star restaurant.

Plan something creative for your date. Rather than simply saying you’re having a movie night, do it up like you’re in a theater. Make popcorn and go to Dollar Tree and purchase cheap candy and drinks. With the money you saved, you can even buy some comfortable fuzzy socks and a cheap, soft blanket that your date will undoubtedly appreciate during your movie night. To make it even more extravagant, buy some fun lights to put up around the room. Or, become kids again and set up your movie night in a blanket fort for an ultimate comfortable, cozy night.

If it’s your first date with someone, you want to make sure they’re comfortable. This can often mean doing something more public. The best way you can do this is by making an adventure out of it. Go somewhere neither of you have been before. Maybe this means taking a bike ride together throughout Monmouth to enjoy the rare bits of sun we’ve been getting. Or, head to Independence and go to somewhere like Second Chance Books to get to know your partner a little more. If you purchase your date a cheap book with the note that something about it made you think of them, I guarantee they will cherish it and be far more flattered than if you just gave them chocolates.

While there’s nothing wrong with the basic Valentine’s Day dates of dinner, flowers and chocolate, sometimes you might find it beneficial to change it up a bit. But in the end, do whatever you think would make you and your date happiest. If that means going to an expensive restaurant, go for it. Just know that there are different ways to spend the holiday. Thinking outside of the box can often lead to the best date you’ve had yet.

Contact the author at chealy16@mail.wou.edu

Photo by: Paul F. Davis

Flower sculpture springs to life in front of education center

Katelynn Bliven | Freelancer

Seemingly out of nowhere, large metal flowers have blossomed to life in front of the Richard Woodcock Education Center. The artwork, titled “Growth”, was the result of an Oregon Arts Commission program to provide high quality, accessible and permanent art in public spaces.

While many students are delighted and intrigued by this latest addition to Western’s outdoor art collection, some are very confused by their spontaneous appearance.

“It’s very cool, I really like the design they made,” said Stephen D. “I don’t know why they’re there, but it doesn’t surprise me because there are a lot of outdoor sculptures around campus.”

Mike Elliot, Western’s construction manager, helped clear up some of the confusion surrounding the sculpture. Elliot explained that it was the result of a program that began in 1975 called Percent for Art. According to the Oregon Arts Commission website, all state building construction plans in Oregon with budgets over $100,000 must set aside no less than 1 percent of their funds for public art. This is why, nearly a year a half after the official opening of the Richard Woodcock Education Center, the artwork seemed to spring up from nowhere.

The theme of “Growth” was decided by the Oregon Arts Commission. After much discussion, the commission decided on the flowers. “Because it was an education building, it needed to speak to growth,” said Elliot.

Once artwork is submitted, the committee then chooses the artist that best represents the initial idea with their concept and design. With the theme of flowers in mind, project manager Kate Ali selected from a state roster of artists that might be interested in creating the piece. For this piece, the Oregon Arts Committee chose Washington artist, Paul Sorey.

Sorey has experience with public works of art. His portfolio consists of “Salmon Waves,” located at the Ballard Locks in Seattle, Washington and “Flow & Flower” at Tahoma High School in Maple Valley, Washington. Many of his previous pieces share a common theme — growth and change.

When asked, several students gave their thoughts on the newest campus monument. Senior Marie B. commented on the aesthetic of the sculpture, “They look cool and modern, especially when the LED lights are on.” “Growth” glows a blue and purple color at night, which makes this latest addition stand out against the other outdoor art on campus.

Junior Susie R. exclaims, “I love it, especially at night. I would love to see more of this around campus.”

Other pieces that came to Western as a result of this program include the stone sculpture in front of Rice Auditorium titled “Oregon Rivers” by Thomas Rudd and the tapestry that hangs in Hamersly Library titled “Soliloquy” by Shelley Socolofsky.

Contact the author at kbliven14@wou.edu

Photo by: Paul F. Davis

Celebrating culture and identity

Sam Dunaway | News Editor

Multicultural Student Union, one of the longest running clubs on Western’s campus, demonstrated their mission of promoting diversity and cultural awareness through their most recent event, Out and Proud.

The weeklong celebration focused on informing people about the LGBTQ community and opening up discussions on the topic. Gabbie Acevedo-Solis, sophomore and Social Membership Director of MSU, explained that the club aims to be as inclusive as possible.

“When we plan our events, we try to focus not specifically on one certain group,” Acevedo-Solis commented. “We try to be very inclusive, and we are a multicultural organization … Really, Out and Proud is not only to recognize the LGBTQ community, but specifically people of color within that community. We want to recognize their achievements and success and also educate people.”

Events for the week included a Queer People of Color student panel, a formal dinner with keynote speaker Mia Vargas and educational presentations on LGBTQ topics.

A presentation led by Stonewall Coordinator Sam Fennel and ASWOU Director of Public Relations Sophie Gilbert focused on providing definitions for terms like queer, intersex, cisgender and transgender. This was an opportunity for students to ask questions about sexual and gender identities that they might not feel comfortable doing otherwise.

A term that can cause confusion is “queer.” Once used as a slur, the term queer has been reclaimed by many in the LGBTQ community to refer to anyone whose sexual orientation, gender identity or expression is not standard in society. Gilbert explained that she identifies as queer, noting, “To me, queer means that I don’t require gender to play into who I’m attracted to or who I’d romantically be interested in.”

Fennel commented on the importance of non-queer individuals in the community. “We’re not separate. We’re all people and we all work together. LGBTQQIAAP, that long entire acronym, it has an “A” for allies. Those are our straight allies … I cannot accomplish what I accomplish without my straight allies.”

The Queer People of Color Panel consisted of six Western students that identify within the LGBTQ community as people of color. Questions were asked about coming out stories, religion playing a part in their background and the representation of LGBTQ individuals in the media.

An audience member asked the panel if their identity as a queer person clashed with their identity as a person of color. Senior Shanna Thomas replied, “I think the hardest part for me is when I’m constantly wanting to fight for my black community and I want awareness on police brutality and young black boys constantly being murdered, but yet my black community isn’t speaking up about black trans women who are constantly being murdered … When you are a black person and you also have another minority identity on top of that, it’s even worse. We need to start focusing on those other minority groups in the black community … I want my black family to recognize that their black sisters who are trans are getting murdered every day, and if they’re not going to speak up for them, who is?”

Acevedo-Solis encourages everyone to attend future MSU events. “We don’t limit our events to just people of color. It’s open to everybody. Everybody is welcome, no matter who you are or where you come from. It’s a way for them to understand and get to know about other cultures. It gives a space for people to get to know people and learn more and educate themselves.”

Search Multicultural Student Union on OrgSync for more information regarding upcoming events.

Contact the author at journalnews@wou.edu

Photo by: Paul F. Davis

Review: “Beautiful People Will Ruin Your Life”

Ashton Newton | Freelancer

The Wombats first made a name for themselves with their 2007 single “Let’s Dance to the Joy Division,” unafraid to blend high energy music and vocals with dark, real themes. Through their first three albums, they set themselves up as a band that’s relatable and great fun to listen to.

Their newly released fourth album, “Beautiful People Will Ruin Your Life” is a bit of a disappointment compared to their previous work. The high energy that The Wombats are known for is still there, but their lyrics and themes fall flat.

The first two singles that The Wombats released off of the album, “Turn” and “Lemon to a Knife Fight” were met with positive critical and fan response, so they generated a lot of buzz for the album, but those two songs are the two most memorable on the entire album. “Lemon to a Knife Fight” is catchy, fast-paced and was an exciting release over the summer. “Turn” takes things a little slower, a song about enjoying the little things. Both songs represented everything great about The Wombats.

The rest of the album still sounds like The Wombats, but I was left feeling like something was missing. They innovated a bit with their sound, this album being much more bass-heavy than their previous work, but I still felt like I’d heard all the themes already in previous songs.

The song “Lethal Combination” simply adds to the growing list of Wombats lyrics about getting blackout drunk. “I Only Wear Black” had me spending the entire three minutes anticipating the end. The imagery of melting ice cream in “Ice Cream” was distracting and took away from the meaning.

There are some positives to the album too. Their bass-heavy songs sound fresh and new with the same energy they’ve had in previous work. “White Eyes” is a fun song that, although the lyrics are a bit cheesy, is catchy and replayable. “Out of My Head” can only be described as groovy, it’s hard not to start moving with the beat.

“I Don’t Know Why I Like You but I Do” is the best mix of meaningful lyrics and catchy music. Being the final song on the album, they definitely end it on a high note, but it’s not enough to make up for the mediocrity that fills most of the album.

There’s something in this album for everybody. If you like The Wombats already, chances are you’ll enjoy the album. If this is the first time you’ve heard of The Wombats, please don’t start here.

Contact the author at anewton15@wou.edu

Photo by: http://thewombats.co.uk/

Review: “Text Me When You Get Home”

Zoë Strickland | Editor-in-Chief

“Text Me When You Get Home: The Evolution and Triumph of Modern Female Friendship” is a title that seemingly holds a lot of weight it takes up a lot of physical space and uses words that denote heavy meaning. However, the title seems to be the only part of this novel that consistently does so. I had higher hopes for Kayleen Schaefer’s print debut.

One of my favorite parts about Schaefer’s book is that it relies on quotes in the same way it talks about friendship every piece used from a book, article or person works together to support Schaefer’s encompassing claim that the cultivation of friendship should be as important, if not more important, as the cultivation of romantic relationships.

The stories about other women, namely Schaefer’s mother, provided some depth to how friendships have changed over time, and how they may look different to people of different ages. However, I had problems with the overall amount of representation in the book. Seemingly, most of the quotes and stories being offered were from middle-class white women. Though the insights added to what Schaefer was trying to say, including people from a variety of different races and classes would’ve presented a well-rounded look at how the dynamics of female friendship may change when presented with different struggles.

While “Text Me When You Get Home” had points that were relatable, I found that it often boxed-in readers by primarily showing only Schaefer’s viewpoint or promoting intangible ideas of friendship like the ones shown on TV. The book uses large amounts of external quotations, but the stories themselves are primarily centered around the author’s own experiences. As someone who couldn’t relate to a lot of Schaefer’s experiences most notably of which is an entire chapter devoted to her joining a sorority and leaving it once she found a significant other I immediately felt closed off from the narrative of the book.

Admittedly, I knew I wasn’t going to truly enjoy “Text Me When You Get Home” after I read part of the introduction. It proclaimed both that female friendships are superior to friendships between people of different gender identities, and that women who prefer to be friends with men do so because they feel threatened by other women. While I agree that this sometimes be the case, it fundamentally doesn’t align with the majority of my belief system.

Claims like these made it so I never fully felt comfortable with the narrative that was being presented. If the writer’s goal is to highlight the bond that exists in female friendships, one of the primary ways of conveying that bond shouldn’t be through the bashing of other types of relationships. Similarly, the binary way in which she refers to relationships immediately leaves out an entire facet of the way in which other people experience them.

“Text Me When You Get Home” starts out with a strong point that one of the larger ways to differentiate “female friendships” it that they oftentimes use more external ways of showing affection, like telling friends to “text me when you get home.” I was expecting this to be the basis of what would inevitably be a comprehensive look at how friendships have changed and progressed over time. While there was a little bit of discussion around that topic, Schaefer instead focused on personal anecdotes and recounting how female friendships have been shown in popular culture.

At face value, this book is good. The writing is strong, the narrative is fairly insightful and it’s obvious that the writer is passionate about what she’s writing about. However, the writer’s meager attempts at inclusivity fails to represent a full-fledged view of what modern female friendship means to people of all identities.  

Contact the author at journaleditor@wou.edu

Photo by: Penguinrandomhouse.com