Mount Hood

Nunsploitation horrors: An immaculate review

Escrito por: Lili Minato | Autónomo

Advertencia sobre el contenido: this article contains spoilers and discusses dark themes involving pregnancy and religion. 

The infamous nunsploitation genre is back with two new blockbuster films that have left audiences rattled and disturbed. 

Nunsploitation is a film subgenre that involves the exploitation of nuns in a horror or thriller setting. Some of the most popular films of this genre come from “The Conjuring” universe, specifically the movies “The Nun” and “The Nun II.”

“Immaculate,” which hit theaters on March 22, gave audiences a more artistic approach to the often repetitive and predictable horror subgenre. “Immaculate” follows an American nun, played by Sydney Sweeney, who joins a hospice convent in Italy. Besides the slightly off-putting comments and actions by the elderly nuns who are cared for in the convent, Sweeney’s character, Sister Cecilia, considers the Italian countryside her new home. 

As the days and weeks pass, Sister Cecilia notices more odd and unusual occurrences around the convent, corresponding with her worsening health. Cecilia becomes increasingly more ill and requests to see a doctor. In return, she gets a checkup by the convent’s appointed physician, 

where the devout nun finds out about her pregnancy. There is nothing that has caused the said pregnancy so it is ruled to be an immaculate conception. Sister Cecilia was going to give birth to the next baby Jesus. 

The first half of “Immaculate” is predictable and filled with plot holes; there is nothing too unique about it. As the film progresses, though, the artistic values start to show.

The final scene provides a beautiful “Rosemary’s Baby” finale for the film. 

Sister Cecilia has just escaped her captors and is free from the convent. She stands outside, surrounded by the beautiful countryside, but the beauty starts to deteriorate as she goes and squats by a tree. The camera moves up close to Cecilia’s bloody face as she begins to scream. 

The screaming lasts for multiple minutes without any camera cuts. After a while, a crying baby can be heard. The camera then pans out and follows Sister Cecilia as she goes and grabs a heavy rock, she brings it toward the crying infant who is out of the frame. She holds a rock above the baby and drops it. With that, the film ends. 

Sweeney gives an excellent performance that proves she has the pipes to be the next big scream queen. 

Along with “Immaculate,” another blockbuster nunsploitation film was released two weeks after the former. “The First Omen” is the sixth installment in the “Omen” franchise and shares a very similar synopsis with “Immaculate.” 

“The First Omen” also revolves around an American woman sent to Italy who becomes suspiciously pregnant on arrival. The only difference is that the main character faces an arguably more sinister birth than Sister Cecilia did. 

Both films are currently in theaters with “The First Omen” getting slightly better ratings than “Immaculate.” For nunsploitation fans, both seem to be worth the watch. 

7/10. 

Contact the author at lminato22@mail.wou.edu  

Vuelve el bebé clásico de culto

Escrito por: Lili Minato | Autónomo

Escenas en blanco y negro, una banda sonora atmosférica e intrigantes diseños cinematográficos hacen de "Cabeza borradora", la película de David Lynch de 1977, un clásico instantáneo para los interesados en el cine de autor y, a lo largo de los años, se ha ganado un culto de seguidores lynchianos.

Recientemente, la atención de los aficionados se ha centrado en el inusual bebé prematuro que desempeña un papel principal en la película. El bebé, al que se suele llamar "Eraserhead Baby", aunque también fue cariñosamente apodado "Spike" por el reparto y el equipo de la película, ha empezado a captar la atención de muchos cinéfilos más jóvenes.

El aspecto anormal del bebé -inspirado en un feto de ternera- y su angustiosa historia han reestructurado el corazón de muchos. Estos jóvenes adultos han acudido a las redes sociales para compartir su aprecio y su instinto maternal por el recién nacido. 

En plataformas como TikTok y Tumblr se han compartido multitud de vídeos, publicaciones y obras de arte en honor del bebé Eraserhead. Algunos de los contenidos incluyen a usuarios que anhelan ser la madre del bebé, mientras que otros cuestionan el amor que la gente siente por un bebé tan monstruoso.

En algunos dibujos y fotos que se han publicado, se puede ver al bebé interactuando con personajes famosos de otras series y películas de ficción, como Fox Mulder de "Expediente X" o Finn el Humano de "Hora de aventuras". 

El amor incondicional y la admiración por el bebé Eraserhead representan un maravilloso ejemplo del encaprichamiento por lo extraño e inusual, así como del cariño y la empatía por el personaje desvalido. 

Al ver "Eraserhead", uno puede sentir asco y repulsión por el tema, pero para otros, la película -y el bebé- pueden tener un impacto mayor. 

Uno puede verse a sí mismo en el bebé: un ente pequeño y débil que rara vez recibe amor y compasión. Otros pueden querer cuidar del bebé, darle vida y sentido. 

Lo mejor de "Eraserhead" es que tiene un mensaje desconocido. La película se deja a la interpretación del espectador. Un espectador puede verse reflejado en la película y otro no. La película se camufla en diferentes significados dependiendo de quién la vea; este fenómeno también ocurre con el propio bebé de "Cabeza borradora". El bebé se presta a la interpretación, al igual que la película, lo que lo hace tan accesible a los fans. Es un personaje misterioso e intrigante, lo que permite que los fans de "Cabeza de Eraser" se encariñen con él. Puede ser una figura malévola o dulce e inocente.

Sea como fuere, el bebé de Eraserhead ha encandilado a los espectadores. Ya sea por las interpretaciones introspectivas del bebé o por su aspecto y comportamiento, la película -y el bebé- seguirán siendo objeto de culto durante años. 

Póngase en contacto con el autor en lminato22@mail.wou.edu. 

Excessive amounts of biopics

Escrito por: Lili Minato | Autónomo

In the past year alone, 17 biopics were released in movie theaters and on major streaming services. The most notable of them is, “Oppenheimer,” which is currently nominated for 13 Oscars. Now, in 2024, new biopics are playing in theaters, including: “Bob Marley: One Love,” as well as the trailer for, “Back to Black,” a film about the life of Amy Winehouse. 

Many of the upcoming blockbuster films fall under the category of biographical movies, including a recently announced four-film series about The Beatles. Theaters everywhere are currently being overrun with these biographical retellings. 

Biopics are a genre that attracts a very specific audience. Most films during this day and age attempt to appeal to all viewers, which can cause the movie to fall flat. Biographical films attract an audience that is interested in the people, or person, that the film is about; rather than having to worry about reaching a large audience, the directors only need to worry about making a mediocre film and disappointing the fans. 

By making a film about a subject with adoring and intrigued fans, directors are almost guaranteed a box office hit. They simply have to hire the right actors and writers to depict an accurate story. There is little creativity needed to share the life of another person. 

Biopics are easier to make compared to an original story with an original script and there is less risk. Even if the film doesn’t end up being well-loved, most people will still go to theaters to see their favorite historical figure on the big screen. 

This is the reason for the constant output of biopics. There will always be famous and notable people to make movies about, and there will always be an audience for them. Original scripts and stories don’t have the safety net of a premade story featuring a well-known figure. 

These biographical films will never stop being produced; people will continue to die and movies will continue to be made. While these films hold some substance for sharing the lives of misunderstood individuals who didn’t have a voice like Priscilla Presley in, “Priscilla,” most biopics continue to reshare over-told stories of famous personalities. 

Biopics have their purpose in our society, but after a while, they will soon become old and overused. 

Póngase en contacto con el autor en lminato22@mail.wou.edu. 

Upcoming Frankenstein films

Escrito por: Lili Minato | Autónomo

Advertencia sobre el contenido: this article contains mentions of suicide

The iconic story of “Frankenstein” has been retold upwards of 114 times through the artistic media of film, the first recorded example being a movie by the same name made in 1910. Now, there are two new “Frankenstein” adaptations coming to the big screen in the upcoming year and a “Frankenstein”-inspired film that is up for an Academy Award. 

These three movies all follow the general themes and plot of “Frankenstein,” while also bringing their own original ideas to the table. From original stories to stylistic elements and cinematography, the classic story continues to spark new life in these adaptations. 

“Poor Things” is an artistic blockbuster that premiered in December of 2023. The story, directed by Yorgos Lanthimos, follows a suicidal pregnant woman — played by Emma Stone — who is resurrected with her brain switched with the underdeveloped brain of her unborn child. She then goes on to explore the world through those new set of eyes. 

While not technically a publicized reproduction of the original story, it takes many elements from the stereotypical depictions of “Frankenstein” — a mad scientist and the resurrection of a new organic creature as well as the exploration and the understanding of society by said creature. The connections to the original Mary Shelley novel are abundant. 

The upcoming film, “Lisa Frankenstein,” takes a different approach to the generic recurring plot points of past “Frankenstein” adaptations. Described as a “coming of rage love story” by IMDb, the plot consists of a teenager in the 80s bringing a corpse — who happens to be her crush — back from the dead. They go on a joint mission to find missing body parts which results in murder, love and possibly happiness.

Even though this isn’t a completely original retelling of the novel, the film seems to be taking on something new with a campy and gothic style that will be loved by younger and older audiences alike. 

Guillermo del Toro’s “Frankenstein,” is a remake of the 1931 classic by the same name. From what the public knows, this film doesn’t seem to stray as far from the original story compared to the other two films mentioned. 

However, audiences shouldn’t expect another repetitive “Frankenstein” movie — del Toro’s past films should inspire viewers to still expect an elevated level of beautiful, stylistic work. Combined with the acting skills of Oscar Issac, Mia Goth and Jacob Elordi, fans of del Toro and “Frankenstein” should anticipate creativity and beauty from this upcoming film.

Contact the author at lminato22@mail.wou.edu

El cambio de política de Netflix provoca el caos

Escrito por: Sierra Porter | Redactora

Netflix es un servicio estadounidense de streaming por suscripción creado en 1997 por sus fundadores Reed Hastings y Marc Randolph. En 2007, lanzaron su servicio de streaming para competir con Blockbuster, que implementó varios planes familiares diferentes. Últimamente, Netflix ha endurecido sus políticas de uso compartido de contraseñas y de hogar único, lo que lo convierte en una auténtica pesadilla para viajeros, familias numerosas y, especialmente, estudiantes universitarios.

El plan más barato es el plan estándar con anuncios que permite ver programas de TV y películas en dos dispositivos por $6,99. 

El plan estándar no tiene anuncios, es full HD, permite el acceso entre tres dispositivos y tiene la opción de añadir un miembro extra- por un coste adicional de 7,99 al mes. El plan premium también está libre de anuncios pero ofrece ultra HD, es accesible en cuatro dispositivos y tiene la opción de añadir dos miembros extra por $7,99 cada uno. 

La nueva posibilidad de añadir miembros con un coste adicional ha animado a Netflix a tomar medidas enérgicas contra el uso compartido de contraseñas fuera de un mismo hogar. Esto significa que si alguien intenta iniciar sesión en su cuenta de Netflix fuera del hogar designado, se desconectará a todos los demás miembros; independientemente de si todavía está dentro del límite de dispositivos. Esta política parece un intento desesperado de ganar dinero, ya que obliga a los usuarios a contratar planes más caros o a pagar costes adicionales. 

¿Por qué supone esto un cambio de juego para tantos? Para muchos estudiantes, la experiencia universitaria completa incluye vivir en las residencias, pero eso también significa que todos los fondos suelen destinarse a esos gastos. Muchos estudiantes afirman que se ven obligados a prescindir de sus planes familiares durante los meses que están en el campus, ya sea porque se ven obligados a vivir sin los servicios de streaming o porque tienen que pagar el coste adicional de ser un miembro más. 

Los viajeros ávidos también se enfrentan a este problema de vez en cuando, ya que pierden la posibilidad de conectarse a Netflix en los muchos lugares en los que se alojan mientras viajan. Una vez más, uno tendrá que desconectar al resto de la familia en el hogar y hacer frente a la ira de los derechos de streaming rabia, bola hasta las tasas adicionales o abandonar Netflix en general. 

Este cambio de política ha sido un dolor para muchos y hasta 62% de los prestatarios de contraseñas dijeron que preferirían dejar de utilizar el servicio de streaming en total antes que adquirir su propia cuenta. El intento de Netflix de obligar a los espectadores a comprar sus servicios, especialmente los más caros, no ha tenido hasta ahora el éxito esperado. Inmediatamente después de estos cambios, Netflix perdió casi 1,2 millones de abonados, su mayor pérdida en más de una década. 

Muchos están cancelando sus suscripciones y cambiándose a otros servicios de streaming, y no podemos culparles. 

Póngase en contacto con el autor en howlstaffwriter@wou.edu

Mixed feelings on Timothee Chalamet’s new movie

Escrito por: Claire Phillips | Redactora de Entretenimiento

Advertencia sobre el contenido: este artículo contiene spoilers

Just in time for the holiday season, a sweet prequel, based on a beloved children’s novel by Roald Dahl, arrived in theaters in the United Kingdom Dec. 8 and the United States Dec. 15. French-American actor Timothée Chalamet stars as a younger version of “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory’s” chocolatier, Willy Wonka. “So quiet up, and listen down. Nope, scratch that, reverse it,” as Wonka says.

The movie features talented actors, such as Hugh Grant, Olivia Colman and Keegan-Michael Key. Timothée Chalamet has acquired a fan base of young women from his roles in movies such as “Call Me By Your Name,” “Lady Bird” and “Little Women.” Word of Chalamet playing a familiar favorite spread quickly. However, some movie-goers had mixed feelings about the new take on the classic. 

“Charlie and the Chocolate Factory ” has already seen two adaptations, starring Gene Wilder and Johnny Depp as Wonka. Additionally, the original book has a sequel, and some fans were wondering why a prequel made it to the screen before an adaptation of the sequel did.

Lili Minato, a sophomore at Western, is a film fanatic and meticulously selects her movies. She proposed a thoughtful question in regards to the new addition to the “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” universe — “I think (prequels) can be done well… but if you want to make a prequel, is it needed?”

Perhaps the initial audience reaction to “Wonka” was due to its misleading advertising. “I thought it was weird that they didn’t (advertise) Wonka as a musical. People went and saw it, and were like, wait, why are they singing?” Minato said. 

Minato also commented that marketing the movie as a musical would have brought in more theater fans. “For some people, that sounds like the total package.”

The movie has an 82% on Rotten Tomatoes and it has many qualities that make for a great movie. With its vibrant costumes, catchy music and elaborate sets, it’s hard to look away. Elements incorporated from older movies such as “Annie” and “Mary Poppins” make “Wonka” all the more charming. For many musical fans, a new timeless classic has just been born.

8/10.

Póngase en contacto con el autor en howlentertainment@wou.edu

Un cambio para el entretenimiento

Escrito por: Taylor Duff | Freelancer

Back in March of 2023, an article was released called “Writers are not keeping up” — published by the Writers Guild of America contract. This article was the start of the Writer’s Strike, expressing how writers are feeling devalued and objectified in harsh work environments, including tiny rooms and decreased pay as well as being overworked. 

The demand for writers is based on the switch to streaming from many if not most, entertainment channels. Because of the high demand, another complaint is the lack of experienced writers being hired to fill the gaps — with below or bare minimum pay giving the green light to have an excuse to pay less. 

Writers have also stated they have felt like second class to the actors and directors — being undervalued in the workplace despite doing double the amount of work and hours.

As a result of this strike taking place, the Screen Actor Guild also went on strike, and actors across all platforms made statements and interviews about the unfair treatment and harassment of their writers and staff. 

Actors such as Amanda Seyfried, Rob Lowe and Wonda Sykes all stood in solidarity with the writers during the protest. One main reason the actors joined the strike with the writers was to address the use of AI versions of themselves; using their likeness for gain in media. The SAG strike lasted until Nov. 9 of this year, meaning both WGA and SAG strikes are now over. WAG reached a tentative agreement with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers back in September, and slowly but surely, they reached an agreement with the Screen Actors Guild as well. 

As for what this means for entertainment, the agreement is effective in protecting writers and giving proper residuals for international viewing. Due to streaming becoming the new wave of entertainment, the agreement takes effect now giving proper pay toward its writers with the royalties standing in their favor. 

Many movies will be delayed due to the strike shutting down production studios, with many directors and producers walking out. TV shows may resume, but will also be pushed back for months without new episodes. As for actors, the agreement gives them more security knowing they are protected against their likeness being used. 

As for the future of entertainment, the WGA contract term will be in effect until May 2026 — keeping in effect this protection for the people behind the entertainment consumed.      



Póngase en contacto con el autor en tduff23@mail.wou.edu